See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
July 2025 - July 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
The short story: Cost-per-app-install (CPI) for the Construction industry across All countries available ran materially below the global benchmark through the sampled months, with a strong downward momentum into early 2026 and a pronounced low in March. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Construction in All countries available compared to the global benchmark.
Across the three recorded points for Construction (Nov 2025 → Dec 2025 → Mar 2026), median CPI fell from $10.70 in November to $8.43 in December and then to $2.28 in March — a cumulative decline of roughly 79% from the November start to the March finish. The selected-series average CPI is about $7.13, with a high of $10.70 and a low of $2.28.
By contrast, the baseline (global) median across 13 months (Jun 2025–Jun 2026) averaged roughly $15.55, with monthly values ranging from about $9.34 (Dec 2025) to a peak near $30.13 (Feb 2026). The Construction “All countries” average (~$7.13) sat about 54% below that global average over the same period. The narrowest gap occurred in December 2025, when Construction CPI was roughly 9.8% below the global median; the widest gap was in March 2026, when Construction CPI was about 86% below the global median.
Volatility in absolute terms for the selected Construction series—standard deviation ≈ $3.56—was smaller in dollar terms than the baseline’s absolute volatility (baseline SD ≈ $5.11). However, on a relative basis the Construction series was more variable: coefficient of variation ≈ 50% versus the baseline’s ≈ 33%, reflecting sharper percent swings around a lower mean.
The available months reveal a downward momentum into Q1 2026 for Construction app-install costs. November-to-December showed a modest decline (~21% month-over-month), while December-to-March recorded a steeper drop (~73% across the winter-to-spring span). The global baseline displays different rhythm: a dip into December, a modest bounce in January, then an outsized spike in February before settling through spring.
These patterns highlight contrasting monthly dynamics: Construction CPI in this sample tightened toward year-end and then rebounded lower, while the broader baseline showed a notable February surge that did not mirror the Construction series.
Framed relatively, Construction across All countries available ran consistently below the overall market in the recorded months. The selected series trailed global CPI by roughly 28% in November, about 10% in December, and roughly 86% in March. While absolute dollar swings were smaller, the lower base produced greater percentage volatility — the Construction coefficient of variation was materially higher than the global benchmark.
For marketers scanning Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends and CPM analysis often form part of the cost picture; here the CPI signal for Construction diverges from the global CPI rhythm, showing a distinct downward momentum and a March trough that widened the gap to global industry ad performance.
Understanding Cost-per-App-Install benchmarks for the Construction industry in All countries available helps clarify how country-specific ad costs and broader Facebook Ads benchmarks compare to aggregated, cross-industry CPM and CTR performance patterns. This summary frames CPI trends for Construction in All countries available against the global benchmark.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Construction industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app