See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Global cost-per-app-install (CPI) moved on a choppy but recognizable seasonal arc: a soft end to 2024, a January trough, a spring rebound, and a sharp mid-year spike that kept prices elevated through Q3 before easing into late 2025. Across the 13-month window, the market averaged roughly 15.9 per install, finishing almost where it started despite a near threefold swing between the annual low and high. June was the outlier, driving the year’s peak and defining the year’s volatility. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Construction across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The period opens at 17.55 in November 2024 and closes at 17.18 in November 2025 — essentially flat year over year (−2%). Beneath that stability sits a wide range: CPI bottomed at 7.22 in January and peaked at 27.90 in June, a 20.68 swing that nearly triples the January low. The global average over the period was 15.91, with six months landing above that mark (Nov 2024; Jun, Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov 2025) and seven below.
Monthly momentum was distinctive. Costs fell from November to December (−28%) and again into January (−43%), then rebounded sharply in February (+78%) before easing in March (−29%). Spring lifted prices into April (+61% vs. March), moderated in May (−18%), and surged into June (+132% month over month), the clear high-water mark. The June spike unwound in July (−56%) but left a higher plateau: August to September held in the 19.9–22.7 range, with October easing (−9%) and November stepping down again (−17%). On average, absolute month-to-month movement was 6.29, implying sizable auction swings relative to the period’s mean.
Seasonality shows through the noise. Late Q4 softened rather than spiking, with December under November, then Q1 produced the expected trough with January at the year’s floor. The market regained momentum through spring, culminating in a June peak that reset levels higher through Q3. From August to October, CPI stayed notably above the overall average before easing into November. In short: Q1 softness, Q2 lift, Q3 elevated, and a gradual Q4 cooldown.
For Construction across all countries, a separate industry time series is not available in this extract, so the global benchmark serves as the directional proxy. Based on that curve, the market’s CPI path likely mirrors the broader pattern: a pronounced January low, a mid-year climax in June, and an elevated Q3 that tapers into late-year normalization. Any precise gap between Construction and the all-industry global level cannot be quantified here, but the timing and magnitude of inflections provide a reliable point of comparison to global Facebook Ads benchmarks.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install highlights how Construction app acquisition costs behave across all countries: a deep Q1 trough, a forceful mid-year spike, and a late-year ease back toward the average. This provides a clear, data-grounded lens on industry ad performance and country-specific ad costs at a global scale, complementing broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance discussions for the Construction industry worldwide.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Construction industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app