Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Consulting

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Consulting

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The clearest story in the data is a mid‑year surge in app‑install costs, followed by a measured comedown into year‑end. Using the global benchmark as our anchor, median cost per app install opened the year low, spiked dramatically in June, then cooled and stabilized through the fall before easing in December. This pattern suggests a market that ran hot mid‑year, with auction pressure and demand pushing costs into the high teens and beyond before normalizing.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consulting across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across the global baseline, median cost per app install averaged about $13.37 in 2025. It started at $7.07 in January, climbed to $11.63 in February, dipped to $8.91 in March, and then pushed into the teens in April ($13.51) and May ($12.32). The standout month was June at $23.76 — the annual high and more than triple January’s level — before a swift correction to $10.77 in July.

From there, the market found a higher plateau: August ($15.99), September ($16.16), and October ($16.43) clustered tightly in the mid‑teens, with a modest pullback in November ($14.57) and a larger year‑end ease in December ($9.32). The annual low came in January ($7.07), and the range from trough to peak spanned roughly $16.69, or a 3.36x swing. Month‑to‑month volatility averaged about $4.6, driven largely by the June spike and July retracement.

Quarterly rhythm reinforces the story: Q1 averaged about $9.21, Q2 jumped to $16.53 (+80% versus Q1), Q3 cooled to $14.31 (−13% from Q2), and Q4 softened further to $13.44 (−6% from Q3). Net of all the movement, December still finished around 32% above January, showing a higher floor than the start of the year.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The benchmark reveals a classic arc: softer acquisition costs in early Q1, steady lift into late spring, and a pronounced mid‑year peak in June. After the July correction, costs settled into a mid‑teens band through August–October — a steadier, more predictable period — before easing into the holidays. This aligns with familiar paid‑social dynamics: competition and budgets often intensify mid‑year and into Q4, while performance typically softens through late Q4 as broader auction pressure rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1.

Country vs. Global

For Consulting across all countries, a dedicated monthly series wasn’t available in the selected dataset, so a precise gap to the global all‑industry benchmark cannot be quantified here. Directionally, any Consulting trend this period would have been measured against a global peak of $23.76 in June and a floor of $7.07 in January, with a mid‑teens equilibrium from August to October and an annual average near $13.37. In other words, the global market set a high‑pressure mid‑year environment and a milder entry and exit to the year; whether Consulting ran above or below that curve isn’t observable in the provided series.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install helps frame industry ad performance when country‑specific ad costs are aggregated across all markets. In 2025, the global CPI trend featured a sharp June peak, mid‑teens stabilization, and a year‑end cooldown — useful context for interpreting Consulting app‑install performance across all countries relative to broader paid‑social CPI trends, CPM analysis, CTR performance narratives, and CPC trends in adjacent metrics.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consulting industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.