Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Consumer Goods

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Consumer Goods

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Consumer Goods app install costs ran a two-speed year: a dramatic Q1 surge followed by a sharp normalization that settled well below the global benchmark. January opened at an elevated 318.50 cost per app install (CPI), February spiked to an exceptional 1,727.97, and by April the market reset to 11.24. Through the summer, costs stabilized in a single-digit band with a slight August lift. Volatility was extreme early and far calmer later, creating one of the widest spreads versus the global Facebook Ads benchmarks in 2025.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consumer Goods across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across the six reported months (Jan, Feb, Apr, Jun, Aug, Sep), Consumer Goods CPI averaged 345.59, heavily skewed by Q1 outliers; the median for the same period was 9.51, reflecting the more typical post-Q1 environment. The period started at 318.50 in January, surged to the yearly high of 1,727.97 in February (+443% month-over-month), then collapsed to 11.24 in April (−99% from February). The low point arrived in June at 3.18, before a modest rebound to 7.78 in August and a step down to 4.85 in September. From January to September, CPI declined 98.5%.

Volatility averaged 628.36 points monthly across the period—orders of magnitude higher than the global trend—driven almost entirely by Q1’s shock. After the reset, monthly swings were more measured: April to June (−72%), June to August (+145%), and August to September (−38%).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm is stark: Q1 inflation, Q2 trough, late-summer stabilization. February was the clear outlier, while April marked the reversion to more “normal” acquisition costs. June’s low coincided with the broader market’s mid-year cost elevation, underscoring how Consumer Goods diverged from typical seasonal pressure. August saw a mild lift, then September eased again, keeping CPI in a tight single-digit range for much of late Q2 and Q3.

Country vs. Global

Against the global benchmark (all industries, all countries), Consumer Goods ran dramatically above market in Q1, then consistently below:

  • January: 318.50 vs. 7.07 globally (+45x).
  • February: 1,727.97 vs. 11.63 (+149x).
  • April: 11.24 vs. 13.51 (−17% below market).
  • June: 3.18 vs. 23.76 (−87%).
  • August: 7.78 vs. 15.99 (−51%).
  • September: 4.85 vs. 16.16 (−70%).

On average across these months, the global CPI was 14.69; Consumer Goods averaged 345.59 due to Q1 extremes. Excluding January–February, Consumer Goods averaged 6.76 from April through September—about 61% lower than the global average for those same months. Volatility tells the same story: Consumer Goods averaged 628 points in absolute month-to-month movement versus 4.57 globally, but when focusing only on April–September, its monthly volatility (~5.2) closely mirrored the global benchmark.

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install show Consumer Goods across all countries experienced an extraordinary Q1 spike before resetting to single-digit CPIs that trailed global levels through late Q3. Understanding CPI trends for Consumer Goods across all countries helps advertisers evaluate country-specific ad costs and compare industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consumer Goods industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.