Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Consumer Goods

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Consumer Goods

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Consumer Goods app install costs swung from extreme inflation to bargain-level lows across all countries, carving a two-act story that diverged sharply from the global benchmark. Costs escalated through late Q4 and into Q1, peaking in February before collapsing to single digits by early Q2 and staying soft through late Q3. Volatility was the defining feature, with one of the widest peak-to-trough ranges in the dataset. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consumer Goods in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across eight monthly medians (Nov 2024–Sep 2025), Consumer Goods cost per app install (CPAI) averaged 281, lifted by an extraordinary February spike. The series started at 32.59 in November 2024 and ended at 4.85 in September 2025, an 85% decline from start to finish.

  • High: 1,727.97 in February 2025
  • Low: 3.18 in June 2025
  • Range: 1,724.79 points

Momentum was dramatic. November to December rose +337% (32.59 to 142.25), December to January added another +124% (318.50), and January to February surged +443% to the 1.73k peak. The correction was just as sharp: February to April fell −99% to 11.24, then slid to the cycle low of 3.18 in June. A modest lift in August (7.78) eased back to 4.85 in September.

Volatility stood out. The average absolute month-over-month swing was 490 points for Consumer Goods versus just 6 points for the global benchmark over the same months—an order of magnitude difference that underscores how atypical the Q1 spike was. Even excluding February, Consumer Goods still averaged 74 across the period.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed a classic Q4-to-Q1 rise but in amplified form: costs climbed through the holidays and accelerated into January and February. Post-Q1, the market reset decisively—April brought the break in trend, with costs settling into low single digits across June, August, and September. The rhythm resembled a front-loaded year: elevated acquisition costs in late Q4 and Q1, followed by a prolonged trough through the summer, with only a slight uptick in August before softening again in September.

Country vs. Global

Compared with the global benchmark, Consumer Goods alternated from far above market to materially below:

  • November–February: consistently above global levels, ranging from +86% in November to an extraordinary +13,328% in February (1,727.97 vs. 12.87). The four-month average was 555 for Consumer Goods versus 12.56 globally—about 44× higher.
  • April–September: decisively below global, from −24% in April to −89% in June. The four-month average was 6.76 for Consumer Goods versus 21.31 for the benchmark—about 68% lower.

While the global baseline rose modestly across the period (+29% from 17.55 in November to 22.72 in September), Consumer Goods fell sharply (−85%), reflecting a choppier, more volatile path.

Closing

For Facebook Ads benchmarks, the cost per app install story in Consumer Goods across all countries is one of extremes: a Q4–Q1 surge culminating in February, followed by a long stretch of low, stable prices into late Q3. Understanding cost-per-install trends for Consumer Goods in all countries, and how they contrast with the steadier global benchmark, helps frame country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance within broader CPAI dynamics.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consumer Goods industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.