Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Denmark

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Denmark

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The headline in the Denmark market is a sharp reversal: cost per app install started the year dramatically above the global benchmark, then cascaded month after month to sit below the world average by July. The arc runs from a Q1 peak to a Q3 trough, with unusually large month-to-month swings that dwarf global volatility. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Denmark compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

For all industries in Denmark, median cost per app install averaged about 81.5 during January–July. It opened at 102.8 in January, climbed to a high of 150.5 in March, and then fell continuously to a low of 7.0 in July. That’s a 95% decline from the March high to July, and a 93% drop from January to July.

Month-to-month movements were pronounced:

  • Jan to Feb: +39.9 (+38.9%)
  • Feb to Mar: +7.8 (+5.5%)
  • Mar to Apr: −54.9 (−36.5%)
  • Apr to May: −50.8 (−53.1%)
  • May to Jun: −17.9 (−40.0%)
  • Jun to Jul: −19.9 (−74.1%)

Volatility averaged 31.9 points in absolute monthly change, far above the global pattern. For comparison, the global benchmark averaged 12.6 across the same months with a much steadier 6.2-point monthly swing.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm in Denmark was a clear surge-then-slide. Q1 was expensive, culminating in March. From April onward, costs deflated each month: roughly halved in May versus April, down another 40% in June, and then a steep July reset.

Globally, the year began softer, tightened through Q2 with a notable spike in June, then pulled back in July. That broader cadence—Q1 troughs and mid-year tightening—is a familiar contour in Facebook Ads benchmarks, even as individual markets diverge. While this view centers on app install costs, marketers often read these moves alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance to understand broader demand pressure and engagement shifts.

Denmark vs. Global

Denmark ran above market six of seven months, then flipped below in July:

  • Average level: Denmark 81.5 vs. global 12.6 (+548%), roughly 6.5× higher.
  • Peak premium: March was the widest gap, with Denmark about 1,590% above global.
  • Narrowest gap: July, when Denmark fell 35% below global.
  • Trend lines: Global costs rose 52% from January to July (7.10 to 10.77), while Denmark fell 93% (102.8 to 7.0).
  • Volatility: Denmark’s month-to-month swings were about 5× larger than the global benchmark.

By June, Denmark’s costs were only 13% above global levels; by July, they were 35% below—marking a rapid normalization after an extraordinary Q1.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install across all industries in Denmark highlights a year that opened with extreme premiums and closed the first half with a decisive correction. This country-specific ad costs view, set against the global benchmark, helps frame industry ad performance in Denmark, while complementary reads across CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance provide added context for how the market compares to worldwide patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Denmark, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Denmark Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Christmas & Boxing Day (late Dec), Easter holidays (groceries, travel, tourism), Mother's Day and Valentine's Day

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter period due to travel-related campaigns. Late December ad competition might intensify in retail and hospitality. Whit Weekend might reduce weekday competition. Strict retail closures on holidays could drop competition, but pre-holiday CPMs may escalate.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.