Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Denmark

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Denmark

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Denmark’s cost per app install (CPI) in 2025 traced a dramatic arc: exceptionally high through Q1, then a steep, month-over-month compression that pulled the market below global levels by mid-year. The year opened with outsized costs and peaked in March before a sharp unwind through July. Compared to the global benchmark, Denmark began the period at a substantial premium and ended with a distinct discount — a rare swing in a short window and a clear signal of volatility and shifting market pressure.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Denmark compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point vs. ending point: Denmark’s CPI was 102.8 in January and fell to 7.0 by July — a 93% decline across seven months.
  • Highs and lows: The peak landed in March at 150.5, while July marked the low at 7.0. The median CPI averaged 81.5 across January–July.
  • Monthly moves: +39% from January to February, +5% into March, then a sequence of declines: −36% in April, −53% in May, −40% in June, and −74% into July.
  • Volatility: Average month-to-month absolute movement was 31.9 points, signaling far sharper swings than typical global patterns.

By quarter, the contrast is pronounced: Q1 averaged 132.0, while Q2 settled at 55.8 — a 58% step-down. The narrative is one of early-year inflation followed by sustained compression.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm in Denmark diverged from common platform seasonality. Instead of easing after the holidays and normalizing in Q1, CPI accelerated into March, then pivoted into a persistent decline from April onward. The four-month stretch from April to July formed a consistent downtrend, with each month posting a lower CPI than the last. The trough in July stands out not only as the period low but also as a reversal of Denmark’s earlier premium into a notable discount.

Globally, the pattern was different. After subdued levels in January and March, the benchmark spiked in June (27.9) before cooling in July (12.7). Subsequent global readings suggest activity picked up again in August–September, indicating typical mid-year demand pressure returning after a brief dip.

Country vs. Global

Across January–July, Denmark’s CPI averaged 81.5 versus the global 13.35 — roughly 6.1x higher. The gap, however, narrowed dramatically over time:

  • January–March: Denmark ran 11–17x above the global benchmark (peaking at a 1,606% premium in March).
  • May: The premium compressed to 3.8x.
  • June: Near parity, Denmark sat about 3% below the global benchmark.
  • July: The gap flipped decisively, with Denmark 45% below global CPI.

Volatility was also differentiated: Denmark’s average monthly swing (31.9 points) was more than four times the global benchmark’s 7.5 points, underscoring a choppier local market.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install across all industries in Denmark show an elevated, volatile Q1 followed by a rapid normalization that brought CPI below global levels by July. Understanding CPI trends and country-specific ad costs helps contextualize industry ad performance and compare Denmark’s app install pricing to the global pattern.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Denmark, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Denmark Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Christmas & Boxing Day (late Dec), Easter holidays (groceries, travel, tourism), Mother's Day and Valentine's Day

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter period due to travel-related campaigns. Late December ad competition might intensify in retail and hospitality. Whit Weekend might reduce weekday competition. Strict retail closures on holidays could drop competition, but pre-holiday CPMs may escalate.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.