See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Global Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install (CPI) tell a clear story: 2025 opened soft, surged mid-year, cooled into December, and then rebounded at the start of 2026. The series moved from $7.10 in January 2025 to a June peak of $23.76 before retracing to $10.43 in December, finishing at $15.39 in January 2026. Volatility was meaningful, with a dramatic mid-year spike and an equally sharp correction in July, followed by steadier, smaller moves in late Q3 and early Q4.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Energy and Mining in all countries compared to the global benchmark. For this period, segment-level coverage for Energy and Mining across all countries mirrors the global benchmark, so the global series serves as the directional proxy.
Across the 13-month window, global CPI averaged about $13.58. The high-water mark was June 2025 at $23.76, while the low came in January 2025 at $7.10—a 2.3x swing. The year of 2025 alone averaged $13.43, placing the June peak roughly 77% above the annual mean. The range from trough to peak spanned $16.66, which is about 123% of the overall average, underscoring a broad trading band.
Momentum shifted quickly throughout the year. After a low start in January, CPI climbed 64% in February, dipped 23% in March, and then jumped 51% in April. The largest single move arrived in June: +93% month over month versus May. That spike was followed by the sharpest correction of the period in July, down 55% from June. Late Q3 steadied with modest gains—+3.6% in September and +1.3% in October—before easing 11% in November and 28% into December. The new year began with a rebound, up 48% from December to January 2026. On average, monthly absolute moves were about $4.50, roughly one-third of the period average—substantial, but not chaotic outside the June–July whipsaw.
The rhythm of 2025 reflected familiar seasonality. Q1 was the trough at an average of $9.22, with the year’s low in January and a brief February lift. Q2 was the most expensive quarter at $16.53, driven almost entirely by the June peak. Q3 normalized to $14.18, with a reset in July and a gradual climb into September. Q4 averaged $13.80, softer than Q2 and Q3, and ended with a pronounced December dip to $10.43 before a January 2026 rebound. The pattern reads as early-year softness, a decisive mid-year peak, a calmer late Q3, and a gentle fade into year-end.
Because the selected view aggregates Energy and Mining across all countries and aligns to the global benchmark, the gap to global is effectively 0% throughout this period. Using the global CPI trend as the reference, the market’s profile shows a +117% lift from January 2025 to January 2026, a peak-to-trough range of $16.66, and average monthly volatility near $4.50. Until a distinct Energy and Mining series is available, this global curve is the most reliable frame for country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance context.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install in the Energy and Mining industry across all countries highlights a year defined by a mid-year spike, late-year softening, and an early 2026 rebound. While this report centers on CPI, it complements broader Facebook Ads benchmarks such as CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, helping situate industry ad performance within global patterns for the Energy and Mining category.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app