See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
The Cost per App Install picture over the last 13 months reads like a pendulum: a steep drop into January, a forceful rebound through spring, a dramatic June spike, and a late‑year cool‑down that leaves costs almost exactly where they started. Across the global benchmark, median cost per app install averaged $15.91 from November 2024 through November 2025, with a wide spread between a January low and a June peak. Volatility was pronounced, but the year closed nearly flat versus its starting point.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Energy and Mining across all countries compared to the global benchmark. Segment‑specific readings for Energy and Mining in all countries are not available in this pull, so the global benchmark provides the directional context.
The period opens at $17.55 in November 2024 and ends at $17.18 in November 2025 — a modest 2% decline across the window. In between, the market ranged from a low of $7.22 in January to a high of $27.90 in June, a $20.69 swing that defined the year’s arc. The average sat at $15.91, with roughly two‑thirds of months clustered between $12 and $21.
Month to month, the global benchmark moved in broad strokes. December fell 28%, then January dropped another 43% to the trough. February rebounded 78%, March eased 29%, and April lifted 61%. The standout move arrived in June: +132% month over month to $27.90, roughly 75% above the 13‑month average. July corrected sharply (−56%), August bounced (+62%), and September pushed higher to $22.72 before a measured taper in October (−9%) and November (−17%). On average, absolute month‑to‑month changes were $6.29, equating to a sizable 46% average swing, underscoring a highly elastic marketplace for app‑install costs.
A classic seasonal rhythm emerges. The first quarter was the softest stretch, averaging $9.75 across January–March, with January marking the period’s bottom. The second quarter accelerated to an $18.23 average, culminating in the outsized June peak. The third quarter sustained that elevation at $18.28 on average, with August–September carrying momentum. Entering the year’s end, October was elevated at $20.72 before easing to $17.18 by November; December of the prior year was notably softer at $12.61. In short: a Q1 trough, a mid‑year surge, and a late‑year normalization frame the benchmark.
Because the Energy and Mining, all‑countries segment is not available in this snapshot, only the global benchmark is shown. As a result, any premium or discount versus market for Energy and Mining cannot be quantified here. The benchmark itself was choppy (−43% from December to January, +132% from May to June) yet broadly mean‑reverting across the 13 months (−2% from November to November). These dynamics set the directional backdrop for evaluating industry ad performance when segment‑level data is present.
Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install show a volatile but ultimately steady year, with a deep Q1 trough and a mid‑year spike that reset the range. Understanding cost per app install trends for the Energy and Mining industry across all countries — and how they compare to global Facebook Ads benchmarks alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance — helps frame country‑specific ad costs and industry ad performance relative to the market’s prevailing rhythm.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app