See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Global cost per app install for Energy and Mining followed a clear arc: a soft open, a sharp mid‑year run‑up, and an elevated finish. The period began in November at 15.83, slid to a January trough of 7.13, then surged into a June peak at 27.90 before settling into a higher band through early Q4, closing October at 19.14. Across the 12 months, the period average landed at 15.10, with volatility that mattered—monthly movements averaged about 6.2 points, punctuated by outsized swings in June and September.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Energy and Mining across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Starting from 15.83 in November, cost per app install (CPI) eased in December (11.30) and bottomed in January (7.13), nearly 53% below the period average. A brief rebound in February (12.52) gave way to another dip in March (8.83), creating a protracted soft patch around the low teens.
Momentum turned decisively in Q2. April (12.59) and May (11.77) set the base for a dramatic June spike to 27.90—about 85% above the period average and 137% higher than May. July retraced to 12.69, but the second half never returned to Q1 levels: August climbed to 18.24, September pressed higher to 23.31, and October cooled to 19.14 while remaining elevated. From the January low to October, CPI rose 168%, and the full-year range spanned 7.13 to 27.90—nearly a 4x spread.
Volatility averaged 6.2 points per month, with the largest jump from May to June (+16.1) and the sharpest pullback from June to July (−15.2). Seven of twelve months sat below the 15.10 period average, underscoring how June and September concentrated the year’s inflationary pressure.
The rhythm here aligns with familiar seasonal contours. Late Q4 of the prior year (November–December) ran below the period average, and early Q1 (January–March) marked the annual low. The market then built through Q2 into a pronounced June peak, with Q3 staying elevated—especially August and September—before easing slightly into October while holding at a higher plateau than the start. In quarterly terms, Q1 averaged 9.49, Q2 lifted to 17.42 on the June surge, and Q3 held near 18.08.
Because this view aggregates all countries, the series is the global benchmark for Facebook Ads benchmarks in Energy and Mining. Against its own period average of 15.10, the gap ranged from 53% below (January) to 85% above (June). The back half (May–October) averaged 18.84, outpacing the first half’s 11.37 by 66%, highlighting a stronger and more volatile second act. In contrast to steadier CPC trends or CPM analysis patterns seen in other objectives, this CPI series was notably choppy, with CTR performance context suggesting demand dynamics and competitive timing can amplify swings in country-specific ad costs when rolled up globally.
Understanding Facebook Ads cost per app install benchmarks for the Energy and Mining industry across all countries shows a year defined by a Q1 trough, a powerful mid‑year escalation, and a higher landing zone into Q4. These CPI trends offer a clear read on industry ad performance at a global level and a basis for comparing country-specific ad costs to the broader pattern.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app