Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Energy and Mining

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Energy and Mining

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads benchmarks: cost-per-app-install trends

This analysis looks at cost-per-app-install trends for industry Energy and Mining and target country All countries available compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

Main takeaways

  • Selected series availability: No monthly observations were available for Energy and Mining across All countries available during the period, so comparisons are directional only.
  • Global baseline level: Average cost-per-app-install (CPAI) was 12.67 over the last 12 months.
  • Highs and lows globally: Lowest CPAI in Oct 2024 (6.20); highest in Jun 2025 (26.21).
  • Momentum: From Oct 2024 to Sep 2025, the global CPAI rose by about 271%.
  • Volatility: Average absolute month-over-month change was roughly 61%, with multiple double‑digit swings.
  • Seasonality: Costs climbed in November and remained higher than October through December; additional peaks appeared mid-year (June) and late Q3 (September). As is typical, costs often trend higher heading into Q4 holiday periods.

Selected dataset overview: Energy and Mining, All countries available

  • Data availability: The selected_data series contained no values for the period provided.
  • Implication: Relative positioning versus the market (above market, below average, or in line) cannot be assessed for this selection based on the supplied timeline.

Global baseline trend (all industries, all countries)

  • Average CPAI: 12.67 across Oct 2024–Sep 2025.
  • High: 26.21 in Jun 2025.
  • Low: 6.20 in Oct 2024.
  • First-to-last change: From 6.20 (Oct 2024) to 22.99 (Sep 2025), a +271% increase.
  • Notable spikes/dips:
  • Nov 2024 surged to 14.28 (+131% vs. Oct), before easing to 8.52 in Dec.
  • Feb and Apr 2025 rebounded to 11.36 and 11.51 after January and March dips.
  • Jun 2025 spiked to 26.21 (+151% vs. May), then cooled in Jul (12.35).
  • Sep 2025 rose again to 22.99 (+53% vs. Aug).
  • Volatility: Month-to-month changes ranged from -53% to +151%, averaging ~61% in absolute terms.

Comparison: Energy and Mining vs. global baseline

  • Because the selected series has no recorded months, a direct comparison of averages, highs/lows, or volatility to the global baseline cannot be computed for this period.
  • Directionally, marketers can reference the global baseline level (average 12.67; high 26.21; low 6.20) to understand where the broader market trended during the same timeframe.

Seasonality and pacing

  • The baseline shows higher costs in November and sustained elevation through December relative to October, consistent with typical Q4 pressure.
  • Outside of Q4, pronounced peaks appeared in June and again in September, underscoring that mid-year and late Q3 can also see elevated acquisition costs.

Understanding cost-per-app-install benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Energy and Mining and All countries available helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.