Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Fitness & Training Centers

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Fitness & Training Centers

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Fitness & Training Centers saw a dramatic, above-market year for Cost Per App Install (CPAI) across all countries, marked by a sharp New Year lift, a spring cooldown, then an extreme midsummer spike that reset the range before a steep Q4 pullback. Compared to the global benchmark, this category ran pricier and notably more volatile, with July standing out as a true outlier.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Fitness & Training Centers across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

CPAI opened at $15.42 in November 2024 and closed at $7.59 in October 2025, a 51% decline end-to-end. The category averaged $29.60 across observed months, nearly double the global benchmark’s $15.18 over the same periods. The high was an exceptional $106.36 in July, while the low landed at $7.59 in October. Outside of the summer surge, most readings sat in the mid-teens to low-$20s.

Monthly rhythm shows a classic New Year swell: December rose to $20.02, January peaked at $31.19, then costs eased through late Q1 into spring—$24.36 in February and $15.67 by March. A mild rebound in April ($19.79) gave way to a softer May–June floor ($16.06 and $15.05). Then the inflection: July blasted to $106.36 (+607% vs. June), more than halving to $54.13 in August, before sliding to the cycle low of $7.59 by October.

Volatility averaged a 23-point swing per observed interval—about 3.4x the global baseline’s 6.8-point average. Excluding the July–August breakaway, the category’s typical shift was closer to 11 points, still choppier than the market.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality reads as: elevated in early Q1, gentler into late spring, an atypically severe price run-up in mid-summer, and a pronounced softening into Q4. January was the early peak ($31.19); June set a near-term floor ($15.05) before July’s outsized jump. By October, CPAI settled well below early-year levels, underscoring how the midsummer spike reshaped the annual range rather than establishing a sustained plateau.

Globally, the pattern differed: the market dipped to a January low ($7.22), climbed toward a June high ($27.90), eased in July, and held in the high teens to low $20s into October ($20.72). The Fitness & Training Centers path was therefore more abrupt and less symmetrical.

Country vs. Global

Across all countries, Fitness & Training Centers ran above the market in 8 of 11 observed months and averaged roughly 95% higher CPAIs than the global benchmark. The gap ranged from slightly below market in November (−12%) to a dramatic July premium of +769% (about 8.7x the global figure). The narrowest positive gaps appeared around April–May (+33–34%). Notable under-market readings showed up in June (−46%) and October (−63%), when global CPAIs were comparatively elevated.

Globally, the trend climbed steadily from January to June (+286%), while Fitness & Training Centers fell into June (−52% from January), then spiked abruptly in July before retracing into Q4. In short, the market moved with a broad seasonal swell; the category moved with sharper amplitude and timing shifts.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per App Install in Fitness & Training Centers across all countries highlights a year defined by early strength, an outsized midsummer surge, and a Q4 reset—materially pricier and more volatile than the global baseline. While this view centers on CPAI, advertisers often consider it alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance to contextualize country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Fitness & Training Centers industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.