See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
France’s cost per app install moved through 2025 with two distinct gears: calm, mid-teens pricing most months, and a dramatic Q2 surge that briefly pushed costs several times above normal. On annual average, France sat above the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, but that premium was concentrated in May–June. Volatility was notably higher than the global baseline, with standout spikes and a rare Q4 trough in November before a year-end rebound.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in France compared to the global benchmark.
France began the year at 11.49 and closed at 11.97, a modest 4% lift end to end. Across the year, the median cost per app install (CPI) averaged 16.62, ranging from a low of 3.08 in November to a high of 63.89 in May. Most months clustered between 7 and 13, but May spiked to 63.89—about 7x April’s 8.75—before receding to 33.32 in June (−48% month over month). After midyear, the market stabilized: July and August held near 12–13, September dipped to 7.13, and October returned to 13.05. November delivered the sharpest drop of the year (3.08, −76% vs. October), followed by a strong December rebound to 11.97 (+289% vs. November).
Volatility in France averaged about 15.0 points in absolute month-to-month moves, more than triple the global benchmark’s 4.5-point average swing. In other words, France’s CPI pattern was far choppier than the broader market. Notably, excluding the May outlier, France’s average would have been approximately 11.9—below the global mean—underscoring how concentrated the premium was in Q2.
Early 2025 was soft: January–February averaged roughly 8.2 in France (with February the year’s second-lowest month at 4.80). The year’s defining event arrived in Q2, when CPI surged to 63.89 in May and remained elevated in June at 33.32. Q3 normalized, hovering around 10–13 with a brief September dip. Q4 was uneven: a typical October level (13.05), an atypically low November (3.08), and a December recovery to 11.97.
By quarter, the rhythm is clear:
Historically, performance often softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1. In 2025, France diverged from that typical arc with an unusually low November and a quick rebound into December.
Globally, CPI averaged about 13.43 in 2025, with a midyear high in June (23.76) and a low in January (7.10). France’s annual average of 16.62 ran ~24% above that level, but the gap hinged on Q2. Month by month, France was above market in 5 of 11 observed months (notably May at +418% vs. global) and below market in the rest (November −79% vs. global marked the widest underperformance). The narrowest gap appeared in July, when France sat about 12% above the global benchmark. Overall, the global trend was steadier with one midyear lift, while France’s path was more volatile, punctuated by a Q2 surge and a deep November trough.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install across all industries in France highlights a year defined by an outsized Q2 surge, softer Q3–Q4 levels, and greater volatility than the global baseline. For teams tracking country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance, this CPI analysis for France provides a clear read on 2025 dynamics relative to worldwide patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting France, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), May–June (spring sales)
CPM and CPC might increase during spring holidays when leisure and travel campaigns see higher engagement. Extended 'ponts' (bridge days) in May could create long weekends with lower weekday ad inventory. Late November and December feature steep increases in ad competition. Christmas season may drive peak ad volumes.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app