Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Gaming

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Gaming

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Gaming app install costs spent the year on a rollercoaster: exceptionally low in early 2025, climbing steadily into a late‑summer spike, cooling in Q4, then rebounding sharply in January 2026. Compared to the global, all‑industry benchmark, Gaming generally ran below market for most of 2025, briefly moved above market in late summer, and finished with a pronounced January surge. Volatility was a defining feature, with several outsized month‑to‑month swings.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Gaming in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to finish: Gaming cost per app install (CPI) opened 2025 at $1.27 and ended January 2026 at $25.65.
  • The year’s low was that $1.27 in January; the high arrived in August at $28.87. The full‑period average was $11.92.
  • Momentum built through spring: $8.45 in April, $9.29 in May, $10.40 in June, and $13.29 in July.
  • The sharpest lift came July to August (+$15.58), followed by a quick compression into September (−$12.48, about −43%).
  • Q4 cooled: $15.03 in October, $13.69 in November, and a December dip to $7.07. The largest single‑month rebound followed in January 2026 (+$18.58, +263% month over month).
  • Volatility averaged a 5.73‑point absolute move per month, notably choppier than the global benchmark’s 4.50‑point average.

For context, the global, all‑industry CPI averaged $13.58 over the same period, peaking at $23.76 in June and bottoming at $7.10 in January 2025. Gaming’s range ($1.27–$28.87) was wider than the global range ($7.10–$23.76).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm was clear:

  • Q1 2025 was the trough for Gaming installs (average ~$2.29), unusually soft relative to the market’s ~$9.22.
  • Q2 formed a steady climb (average ~$9.38), before a pronounced Q3 surge (average ~$19.51) with the August high.
  • Q4 softened (average ~$11.93), aligning with typical end‑of‑year competition and rising auction pressure.
  • Early Q1 2026 rebounded strongly, with January landing at $25.65.

The global benchmark followed a gentler arc: a mid‑year crest in June, moderate Q3, and a seasonal Q4 cool‑down with a smaller January bounce.

Country vs. Global

Relative performance shifted throughout the year:

  • Gaming trailed the global CPI by wide margins in early 2025 (−82% in January, −74% in February, −71% in March).
  • The gap narrowed by late spring (−37% in April, −25% in May) and widened again in June (−56%).
  • Gaming moved above market in July (+23%), spiked in August (+85%), and hovered near parity in September (+1%).
  • It slid modestly below market through October–December (−8% to −32%), then re‑accelerated far above market in January 2026 (+67%).
  • Across 2025, Gaming averaged ~$10.78 versus the global’s ~$13.43 (about 20% lower), with 27% higher month‑to‑month volatility than the benchmark.

While this report centers on cost per app install, it sits within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks that also track CPC trends, CPM analysis, CTR performance, and country‑specific ad costs to contextualize industry ad performance.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install in the Gaming industry across all countries helps advertisers evaluate acquisition cost dynamics against global patterns and interpret how seasonal surges and slowdowns shape CPI over the year.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Gaming industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.