Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Healthcare

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Healthcare

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The headline in the data is clear: Healthcare app install costs across all countries ran well below the global benchmark for most of the year, with steadier month-to-month movement and fewer severe spikes. The category opened the year elevated, fell into a spring trough, rebuilt through late summer, and peaked in October before a sharp November break and a December reset. This subdued volatility contrasts with a much choppier and costlier global pattern, which surged mid-year.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Healthcare in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

For 2025, Healthcare’s median Cost Per App Install averaged $6.41 across all countries, ranging from a low of $4.68 in March to a high of $8.98 in October. The year started at $8.87 in January and ended at $7.13 in December, a 20% decline from the opener. Month-to-month volatility averaged $1.65, indicating a relatively smooth arc.

Key moments in the year:

  • Early-year reset: Costs slipped from $8.87 (January) to $7.46 (February) before dropping to the annual low of $4.68 in March.
  • Spring stabilization: April–May hovered around $4.85–$4.99, then lifted to $6.23 in June.
  • Summer build: July stayed soft at $4.86, before rising to $6.28 in August and $7.84 in September.
  • Peak and break: Costs peaked at $8.98 in October, then fell sharply to $4.75 in November—the largest single-month contraction—before a rebound to $7.13 in December.

Across the year, Healthcare’s peak-to-trough spread was $4.30, underscoring a contained range for app install costs.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The category’s rhythm followed a measured seasonal cadence:

  • Q1 tracked a reset pattern (average $7.00), with momentum cooling into March.
  • Q2 was the softest quarter (average $5.36), marked by a stable floor from April through June.
  • Q3 showed a gradual rebuild (average $6.33), with costs rising into September.
  • Q4 was mixed (average $6.95): an October peak, a November dip, and a December recovery—suggesting holiday-period dynamics that didn’t uniformly inflate costs for Healthcare.

This pulse stands in contrast to the broader market, where mid-year pressures were substantially higher and Q4 remained elevated.

Country vs. Global

Against the global benchmark for Cost Per App Install, Healthcare across all countries was consistently cheaper and less volatile:

  • Average gap: Healthcare at $6.41 vs. global $13.43—about 52% lower on the year.
  • Volatility: Healthcare’s monthly change averaged $1.65 versus the global benchmark’s $4.46.
  • High/low comparison: Healthcare ranged $4.68–$8.98; the global benchmark ranged $7.10–$23.76, spiking most in June.

By month, Healthcare trailed global levels by 32–74% throughout the year, except January, when it briefly ran 25% above the benchmark. The narrowest gap appeared in December (32% below), while the widest shortfall landed in June (74% below). Globally, the trend surged into June and stayed elevated through early Q4; Healthcare’s pattern was gentler, peaking in October and delivering a notable November drop that the broader market did not mirror as sharply.

Closing

In Facebook Ads benchmarks for app install campaigns, Healthcare’s Cost Per App Install across all countries stayed meaningfully below the global average, with a controlled seasonal curve and softer volatility. Understanding these CPI trends—alongside broader CPM analysis, CTR performance, and country-specific ad costs—helps situate Healthcare industry ad performance within global patterns and clarify how the category diverged from the overall market in 2025.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Healthcare industry, Facebook ad costs can be higher than average due to specialized audience targeting and compliance requirements. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.