See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all countries, HR & Staffing app install costs moved through a clear midyear surge and a softer finish, with outsized volatility framing the story. Cost Per App Install (CPI) started the year low at $7.07 in January, spiked to a peak of $23.76 in June, then settled into a mid‑teens plateau through early Q4 before sliding to $9.32 in December. On the year, the average CPI landed at $13.37, with a median of $12.92 and a wide 3.4x range between the high and low. Month-to-month swings averaged $4.57 (about 36% change), marking a choppy year even by performance marketing standards.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The year opened at $7.07 in January, lifted to $11.63 in February, and cooled to $8.91 in March—an early trough around single-digit CPIs. Momentum rebuilt into spring: April at $13.51 and May at $12.32 set the stage for a dramatic June spike to $23.76, the year’s high and nearly double May (+93%). That surge unwound quickly, with July falling to $10.77 (−55% from June).
From there, HR & Staffing CPIs found a steadier band. August ($15.99), September ($16.16), and October ($16.43) clustered tightly within a narrow $0.44 spread, suggesting stabilization after the midyear shock. November eased to $14.57, and December completed the softening at $9.32. End-to-start, the series finished about 32% above January’s level, but with a path defined more by spikes and pullbacks than a smooth climb.
On yearly statistics: the average CPI was $13.37, the median $12.92, and the high–low range spanned $16.68. Six months landed above the annual average (April and August–November), with the longest “above-average” run from August through November. Absolute month-to-month changes averaged $4.57, with the largest moves concentrated around the June peak and July correction.
Seasonally, Q1 was the softest quarter (average $9.21), marked by a February pop but otherwise subdued costs. Q2 was the strongest (average $16.53), driven almost entirely by June’s outsized spike. Q3 averaged $14.31, stabilizing in the mid-teens with a shallow climb from July to September. Q4 began firm in October ($16.43) and then decelerated: November eased, and December reset near Q1 territory. The rhythm reads as early-year softness, a steep Q2 escalation, then a mid-teens consolidation that ultimately gave way to a late-year decline.
Because this view aggregates all countries for the HR & Staffing industry, it effectively represents the global Facebook Ads benchmark for Cost Per App Install in this category. As such, there is no above- or below-market gap to report—the selected series and the global benchmark are the same view. Notably, the defining characteristic of this benchmark is its midyear volatility: the June peak, the sharp July correction, and a brief late‑Q3/early‑Q4 plateau before a December pullback.
In summary, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per App Install in HR & Staffing across all countries show a year shaped by a dramatic midyear spike, a stable mid‑teens stretch, and a softer Q4 close. This CPI trendline offers a clear, data-grounded view of industry ad performance, complementing broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance discussions with a dedicated lens on country-agnostic app install costs for HR & Staffing worldwide.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app