Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for HR & Staffing

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for HR & Staffing

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, HR & Staffing app install costs moved through a clear midyear surge and a softer finish, with outsized volatility framing the story. Cost Per App Install (CPI) started the year low at $7.07 in January, spiked to a peak of $23.76 in June, then settled into a mid‑teens plateau through early Q4 before sliding to $9.32 in December. On the year, the average CPI landed at $13.37, with a median of $12.92 and a wide 3.4x range between the high and low. Month-to-month swings averaged $4.57 (about 36% change), marking a choppy year even by performance marketing standards.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

Section 1: The story in the data

The year opened at $7.07 in January, lifted to $11.63 in February, and cooled to $8.91 in March—an early trough around single-digit CPIs. Momentum rebuilt into spring: April at $13.51 and May at $12.32 set the stage for a dramatic June spike to $23.76, the year’s high and nearly double May (+93%). That surge unwound quickly, with July falling to $10.77 (−55% from June).

From there, HR & Staffing CPIs found a steadier band. August ($15.99), September ($16.16), and October ($16.43) clustered tightly within a narrow $0.44 spread, suggesting stabilization after the midyear shock. November eased to $14.57, and December completed the softening at $9.32. End-to-start, the series finished about 32% above January’s level, but with a path defined more by spikes and pullbacks than a smooth climb.

On yearly statistics: the average CPI was $13.37, the median $12.92, and the high–low range spanned $16.68. Six months landed above the annual average (April and August–November), with the longest “above-average” run from August through November. Absolute month-to-month changes averaged $4.57, with the largest moves concentrated around the June peak and July correction.

Section 2: Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Q1 was the softest quarter (average $9.21), marked by a February pop but otherwise subdued costs. Q2 was the strongest (average $16.53), driven almost entirely by June’s outsized spike. Q3 averaged $14.31, stabilizing in the mid-teens with a shallow climb from July to September. Q4 began firm in October ($16.43) and then decelerated: November eased, and December reset near Q1 territory. The rhythm reads as early-year softness, a steep Q2 escalation, then a mid-teens consolidation that ultimately gave way to a late-year decline.

Section 3: Country vs. Global

Because this view aggregates all countries for the HR & Staffing industry, it effectively represents the global Facebook Ads benchmark for Cost Per App Install in this category. As such, there is no above- or below-market gap to report—the selected series and the global benchmark are the same view. Notably, the defining characteristic of this benchmark is its midyear volatility: the June peak, the sharp July correction, and a brief late‑Q3/early‑Q4 plateau before a December pullback.

Closing

In summary, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per App Install in HR & Staffing across all countries show a year shaped by a dramatic midyear spike, a stable mid‑teens stretch, and a softer Q4 close. This CPI trendline offers a clear, data-grounded view of industry ad performance, complementing broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance discussions with a dedicated lens on country-agnostic app install costs for HR & Staffing worldwide.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.