Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for HR & Staffing

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for HR & Staffing

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Global cost-per-app-install (CPI) in Facebook Ads showed a sharp mid-year surge followed by an elevated finish, creating one of the choppier arcs of the year. Costs fell into January, spiked dramatically in June, cooled in July, and then rebuilt through early Q4. Across all countries, the period averaged about $15.10 per install with a median of $12.64, indicating a top-heavy distribution driven by a few expensive months. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The period opened at $15.83 in November 2024 and closed at $19.14 in October 2025, a 21% lift end to end. The low came in January at $7.13, while June posted the clear high at $27.90—nearly 4x January’s trough. The average for the 12 months landed at $15.10; the median was lower at $12.64, underscoring how June and September ($23.31) pulled the mean up.

Volatility was notable. The average absolute month-over-month swing was about $6.23, and the standard deviation across the period was roughly $5.8 (coefficient of variation ≈ 38%), both well above what many marketers consider a steady market. Key moves included a brisk rebound from January to February (+76%, $7.13 to $12.52), a pullback in March (−30%), an upswing into April (+43%), and then the outsized jump into June (+137% from May). Post-peak, July reset lower (−55% vs. June), before late Q3 momentum lifted CPI in August (+44%) and September (+28%), easing again in October (−18%).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm maps to a classic trough-to-peak-to-reset pattern. Early Q1 marked the softest point (January), spring traded choppily, and June stood out as an extreme. The second half settled into a two-step: a July dip, then a steady climb into September before October moderated. While many channels see firmer competition in late Q3 and Q4, the standout here is how much of the annual CPI shape is explained by the June spike, with late-year costs remaining elevated relative to the early months.

Country vs. Global

Because the selected view aggregates all countries and the HR & Staffing industry time series is not available as a separate cut, the global CPI curve serves as the operative Facebook Ads benchmark. In other words, the “selected” market and the baseline align here. That means level and volatility observations—average near $15, lows around $7, highs near $28, and pronounced month-to-month swings—define the directional range for HR & Staffing across all countries. Without a distinct industry series, above-market or below-market gaps versus the global line cannot be quantified in this slice.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-app-install benchmarks for HR & Staffing across all countries helps situate country-specific ad costs within a global frame and clarifies how CPI trends evolved—peaking mid-year, stabilizing in late Q3, and moderating into October—providing a clear, data-driven view of industry ad performance relative to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.