Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Israel

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Israel

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all industries in Israel, cost per app install moved on a different track than the global Facebook Ads benchmarks in 2025. The year’s story is defined by extremely low costs in early Q2, a sharp lift into mid-year, and an atypical late‑year dip before a modest December rebound. While the global benchmark stayed elevated through most of the year, Israel’s costs remained consistently below market with wider, choppier swings month to month.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Israel compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

In Israel, cost per app install (CPAI) began at just $0.36 in April, climbed through the summer to a high of $8.83 in July, softened to $6.85 in August, plunged to $1.00 in November, and finished the year at $2.85 in December. Across the observed months, Israel averaged $4.49 per install, with a low of $0.36 (April) and a high of $8.83 (July).

The month-to-month rhythm was pronounced:

  • April to May jumped from $0.36 to $5.57 (+1,467%).
  • May to June added a smaller +7% to $5.96.
  • June to July rose +48% to the annual peak ($8.83).
  • July to August eased −22% to $6.85.
  • August to November fell sharply to $1.00 (−85% across the interval).
  • November to December rebounded +184% to $2.85.

Observed step changes averaged about $3.02, highlighting meaningful volatility within Israel’s market.

Globally, the benchmark averaged $13.37 across 2025, with a high point in June ($23.76) and a late‑year cooldown into December ($9.32).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The Israeli series shows a mid‑year lift typical of stronger summer acquisition (May–July), followed by a softening into August. Unlike the broader pattern where performance costs stay firm through Q4 as competition rises, Israel’s November marked a notable trough near $1.00, with only a partial recovery in December. The result is a “hollow Q4” profile for Israel in the available sample, contrasting with the global pattern of elevated Q4 costs and a December pullback.

Country vs. Global

Across overlapping months, Israel’s average CPAI was $4.49 versus $14.32 globally—about 69% lower. Every observed month in Israel sat below the benchmark:

  • April: $0.36 vs $13.51 (−97%).
  • May: $5.57 vs $12.32 (−55%).
  • June: $5.96 vs $23.76 (−75%).
  • July: $8.83 vs $10.77 (−18%)—the narrowest gap.
  • August: $6.85 vs $15.99 (−57%).
  • November: $1.00 vs $14.57 (−93%).
  • December: $2.85 vs $9.32 (−69%).

Trend-wise, the global benchmark rose into mid‑year, plateaued at elevated levels in early Q4, then cooled in December. Israel’s curve was choppier: a dramatic early lift from April’s floor, a mid‑year peak, then an unusually low November before a modest year‑end rebound. In relative terms, Israel tracked well below average throughout, occasionally closing the gap (July) but never reaching parity.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install across all industries in Israel highlights a market with consistently lower country‑specific ad costs than the global average and pronounced intra‑year swings. These CPAI trends give performance marketers and creative strategists a clear view of Israel’s industry ad performance relative to global patterns, complementing broader CPM analysis and CTR performance comparisons.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Israel, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Israel Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Apr 13–19Passover
May 1Independence Day
Jun 2Shavuot
Sep 23–24Rosh Hashanah
Oct 2Yom Kippur
Oct 7–14Sukkot

Key Shopping Season

Passover (April), Sukkot and Fall holidays (Sept–Oct), Hanukkah (December)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during Passover as consumers prepare homes and plan meals. Fall holiday cluster may see media consumption fluctuate—consumers often offline during holidays, but prior week advertising demand may peak. Yom HaAtzmaut might spark tourism and leisure engagement. Hanukkah could drive e‑commerce CPMs for toys and electronics.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.