Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for IT Services & Outsourcing

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for IT Services & Outsourcing

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Cost per app install (CPI) across all countries showed a clear mid‑year surge and a late‑year cooldown, with a dramatic June spike setting the tone for a choppy 2025. The year opened low at $7.07 in January, peaked at $23.76 in June, and finished at $9.32 in December. Despite the modest end, the average across the year landed at $13.37, pulled upward by the summer run‑up. Volatility was pronounced: month‑to‑month moves averaged $4.57, roughly a third of the annual average, with the sharpest swings clustered around Q2–Q3. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for IT Services & Outsourcing across all countries compared to the global benchmark. As the industry‑specific series is unavailable in this cut, the global view serves as a directional proxy for Facebook Ads benchmarks on CPI.

The story in the data

The year began with bargain installs: $7.07 in January rose 64% to $11.63 in February, dipped to $8.91 in March, then lifted to $13.51 in April. May eased to $12.32 before the year’s defining jump in June to $23.76—nearly double month‑over‑month and 3.4x January. That spike unwound quickly: July fell 55% to $10.77. Late summer stabilized in the mid‑teens—$15.99 in August, $16.16 in September, $16.43 in October—before costs softened to $14.57 in November and reset to $9.32 in December (−36% versus November).

Across the year, CPI averaged $13.37, with six months above and six below that mark. The range was wide ($7.07 to $23.76), a $16.69 spread. Absolute monthly volatility averaged $4.57, highlighting a market that swung harder than a smooth seasonal progression would suggest. From January to October, the benchmark climbed 132% before easing into year‑end, still closing 32% above January.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality formed a clear rhythm:

  • Q1 was soft, averaging $9.21, with brief momentum in February.
  • Q2 was the high watermark at $16.53, dominated by June’s outsized spike.
  • Q3 averaged $14.31, reflecting recovery from July’s reset and a mid‑teens plateau.
  • Q4 averaged $13.44, with elevated October levels followed by a pronounced December drop.

While performance typically tightens in late Q4 as competition intensifies, this series shows a late‑year decline instead, indicating a softer install market into December within this benchmark.

Country vs. Global

Because this view aggregates all countries and the IT Services & Outsourcing cut is not available, the only measurable series is the global all‑industry benchmark. As a result, gaps between the industry and the market cannot be quantified here. What is clear in the benchmark itself: a steeper, more volatile mid‑year ascent than the start or finish, a mid‑teens plateau from August to October, and a decisive year‑end cooldown.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install in IT Services & Outsourcing across all countries helps contextualize country‑specific ad costs and industry ad performance against global CPI trends. While CPI is the focus, marketers often view it alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance to gauge how acquisition efficiency aligns with broader global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the IT Services & Outsourcing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.