Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Italy

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Italy

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Italy’s cost per app install (CPI) in 2025 told a two-act story: a high-cost start, a sharp mid-year swing, and a second-half plateau at notably low levels. Across all industries, Italy averaged 5.44 per install for the year—about 59% below the global benchmark average of 13.37. The market briefly ran above market in January and hovered near parity in February–March, then fell dramatically from April onward, diverging from a global trend that stayed elevated through most of the year. Volatility in Italy was concentrated around a June spike and a July trough, while the back half of the year settled into a low, steady rhythm.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Italy compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Italy opened the year expensive at 12.88 in January, eased to 11.39 in February and 9.03 in March, then reset to 2.90 in April and 2.30 in May. June produced an abrupt upswing to 12.58—the second-highest point of the year—followed by a collapse to the annual low of 0.95 in July. From there, CPI rebuilt gradually: 1.31 in August, 2.76 in September, 3.85 in October, and back to the low 2.6–2.7 range in November–December.

  • Annual average: 5.44 (vs. global 13.37)
  • High/low: 12.88 (January) / 0.95 (July), a 13.5x spread
  • End-state: 2.65 in December, down 79% from January
  • Month-to-month volatility: 3.33 on average (vs. global 4.57), with the largest shifts May→June (+10.28) and June→July (−11.62)

Globally, CPI peaked at 23.76 in June and remained elevated through October (14.6–16.4) before easing into December at 9.32. Italy’s extreme June–July pivot stands out against this steadier global arc.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The first quarter in Italy was comparatively costly, with January the local peak. A structural break arrived in April–May as CPI reset into low single digits. June briefly mirrored global inflation with a sharp rise, but Italy diverged immediately after: July marked the year’s trough, and August–December held a low plateau between roughly 1.3 and 3.9, with a modest lift in October. This formed a H1 vs. H2 split—Italy’s second-half average (2.37) was 72% lower than its first half (8.51), while the global benchmark increased modestly from H1 (12.87) to H2 (13.87).

In short, global CPI typically stayed firm through midyear and into early Q4, whereas Italy’s costs cooled dramatically after June and remained subdued through year-end.

Country vs. Global

Italy’s CPI averaged 59% below the global benchmark for the year. The market ran above global in January (+82%) and roughly in line in February (−2%) and March (+1%). From April onward, Italy consistently under-ran global costs:

  • April–June: 47–79% below global
  • July–December: 72–92% below global, with the widest gap in August (−92%)

The gap narrowed the most in February (−2%) and widened in August. Italy’s range was more extreme (13.5x high-to-low vs. 3.4x globally), even though its average month-to-month swings were smaller, reflecting a market with a few sharp pivots followed by a long, stable low-cost period.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install across all industries in Italy shows a year defined by a high-cost start, a June spike, and a sustained low-cost second half, consistently below global levels. This CPI analysis provides country-specific ad costs for Italy and a clear view of how all-industry app install pricing compared to the global trend in 2025.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Italy, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Italy Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
Apr 25Liberation Day
May 1Labour Day
Jun 2Republic Day
Aug 15Ferragosto
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26St. Stephen's Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Christmas & post‑Christmas sales (late December), Ferragosto (mid‑August) summer tourism, Back‑to‑school (September)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might increase during spring holidays when Italians engage in travel or leisure. Ferragosto may see travel and hospitality ads face high competition while retail CPMs dip. Late November and December see ad demand surges. 'Ponte' long weekends could affect ad pacing with stronger performance on adjacent weekdays.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.