See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Italy’s app install costs told a two-act story: a near‑parity start against the market, followed by an extended stretch far below global levels. Cost per App Install (CPI) opened 2025 elevated at 12.88, hovered near the benchmark through March, then broke sharply lower from April onward, landing at just 0.34 by January 2026. Meanwhile, the global benchmark climbed steadily through the year. Volatility clustered midyear in Italy, with a sharp June rebound and a July collapse standing out as the period’s defining swings. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Italy compared to the global benchmark.
Across January 2025 to January 2026, Italy’s CPI averaged 5.02, ranging from a high of 12.88 in January 2025 to a low of 0.34 in January 2026. The period began at 12.88 and ended at 0.34, a 97% decline. After a steady early‑Q1 drift down (−12% in February, −21% in March), CPI plunged in April to 2.90 (−68% month over month) and held low in May (2.30). June delivered a brief surge to 12.58 (+448%), immediately followed by a July crash to 0.95 (−92%). From there, Italy rebuilt gradually: August 1.31, September 2.76, October 3.85, before softening into November 2.69 and December 2.24, and finally the period low in January 2026.
Volatility averaged 3.24 points of absolute month‑to‑month change, with the largest movements concentrated midyear: a May‑to‑June spike (+10.28 points) and a June‑to‑July drop (−11.62). Despite those shocks, more than 60% of months (8 of 13) sat below 3.00, reflecting a long low‑cost plateau once the market broke lower.
The rhythm split cleanly by halves. Q1 2025 was the high‑cost phase (average 11.10), with Italy essentially at or above market levels. Q2 marked the break: April and May compressed sharply before a one‑month June rebound. Q3 (average 1.68) was the trough, bottoming in July and recovering modestly through September. In Q4, Italy stayed subdued (average 2.93) with a small October lift and softer November–December. Early 2026 reset to an extreme low.
In contrast with typical year‑end competition, Italy’s Q4 CPI remained restrained, even as the global benchmark held elevated levels.
Relative to the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, Italy’s CPI averaged 63% lower (5.02 vs. 13.58). Trajectories diverged: Italy fell 97% from January 2025 to January 2026, while the global benchmark rose 117% over the same window. The spread shifted dramatically over the year: Italy started above market in January (+82%) and hovered near parity in February (−2%) and March (+1%). From April onward, Italy consistently undercut global CPI—by 47% at the narrowest (June) and typically by 77–92% through H2, reaching a 98% gap in January 2026. Global volatility averaged 4.50 points per month, higher than Italy’s 3.24, but with steadier upward momentum and a midyear peak (June at 23.76).
Italy’s Q4 averaged 2.93 versus the global 13.80 (−79%), underscoring how country‑specific ad costs can diverge from broader CPM analysis, CPC trends, and CTR performance patterns.
In summary, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per App Install across all industries in Italy show a year that began near global pricing and finished at a sustained discount, marked by a midyear whipsaw and a low, stable second half. Understanding CPI benchmarks for all industries in Italy provides a clear view of country‑specific ad costs and how industry ad performance compares with global Facebook Ads benchmarks.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Italy, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
Late November (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Christmas & post‑Christmas sales (late December), Ferragosto (mid‑August) summer tourism, Back‑to‑school (September)
CPM and CPC might increase during spring holidays when Italians engage in travel or leisure. Ferragosto may see travel and hospitality ads face high competition while retail CPMs dip. Late November and December see ad demand surges. 'Ponte' long weekends could affect ad pacing with stronger performance on adjacent weekdays.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app