Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Marketplaces

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Marketplaces

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Marketplaces apps spent the year paying materially more per install than the broader market, and they did it with far sharper swings. Across all countries, cost per app install (CPAI) for Marketplaces averaged 52.9, nearly four times the global benchmark, with a dramatic March spike and a May trough that defined the year’s cadence. After a soft midyear, costs lifted again in October and December, closing the year slightly below January but still well above average. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Marketplaces across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The year opened high at 72.23 in January, slid to 48.60 in February (−33%), then surged to the annual peak in March at 105.28. From there, CPAI fell steeply through April and bottomed in May at 23.49 — a 78% drop from the March high — before rebounding in June to 51.87. Q3 remained softer, with July at 42.80, August at 26.26, and a mild lift to 38.90 in September. Q4 re-tightened: October jumped to 71.61, November cooled to 40.06, and December ended at 64.62. Net, December finished 10% below January.

Across the year, Marketplaces CPAI averaged 52.9, ranging from 23.49 (May) to 105.28 (March). Only four months (January, March, October, December) sat above the annual average, underscoring a high-low year concentrated around two elevated windows. Volatility was pronounced: the average month-to-month swing was 28.9, indicating choppier movement than a typical category trendline.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The year’s rhythm broke into distinct phases:

  • Q1 was the most expensive quarter, averaging 75.4, punctuated by March’s peak.
  • Q2 and Q3 were the softest periods, averaging 41.5 and 36.0 respectively, with the May low anchoring the trough.
  • Q4 re-accelerated to 58.8 on the back of October and December, with a brief November cool-off.

This pattern diverges from broader market tendencies where costs often intensify midyear and in early Q4. Here, March created an early-year crest, midyear softened materially, and Q4 showed renewed pressure without a clean month-to-month build.

Country vs. Global

Against the global benchmark, Marketplaces ran persistently above market. The global average CPAI across 2025 was 13.43 versus 52.9 for Marketplaces — about 3.9x higher (+294%). Every month cleared the global level:

  • Narrowest gap: August, 26.26 vs. 15.61 (about 68% above).
  • Widest gap: March, 105.28 vs. 8.92 (about 11.8x, or 1,080% above).
  • Early-year and October–December typically ranged 4x–12x above global.

The trajectories also differed. The global series rose modestly into midyear and ended December about 47% above January. Marketplaces was more volatile and ended December 10% below January. Volatility further underscored the contrast: average monthly swings were 28.9 for Marketplaces versus 4.46 globally — roughly 6.5x more volatile.

Closing

Taken together, these Facebook Ads benchmarks highlight a year where cost per app install for the Marketplaces industry across all countries ran far above the global average and moved in sharper waves, with a March peak, a May low, and renewed Q4 pressure. Understanding cost per app install benchmarks for Marketplaces across all countries — alongside related CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance — helps contextualize country-specific ad costs against global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketplaces industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.