Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Media

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Media

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The Media industry’s cost-per-app-install (CPI) across all countries moved in extremes—soaring well above the market in some months and plunging below it in others—while the global benchmark for all industries stayed relatively steady. The year opened with a record spike in January, cooled rapidly by February, and then settled into an elevated spring before dropping to single digits by July. Volatility, not direction, defined the story.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Media in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Media CPI across all countries averaged about 145.7 over the observed months, with a high of 411.0 in January and a low of 1.22 in December—a more than 300x spread. The sequence was dramatic:

  • November: 289.8 (starting point)
  • December: 1.22 (down 99.6% from November)
  • January: 411.0 (more than 330x December)
  • February: 7.17 (down 98% from January)
  • March: 154.6 (roughly 22x February)
  • April: 149.2 (off 3.5% from March)
  • July: 6.96 (down 95% from April)

Average absolute month-to-month movement for Media was roughly 233 points, reflecting severe swings. By contrast, the global benchmark moved just 3.8 points on average over the same intervals.

The baseline (all industries, global) over the same months averaged 11.1, ranging from 6.56 in January to 15.0 in November. Across the full Nov–Oct window, the global average was about 14.2, peaking in June at 27.78 and dipping in January at 6.56—large enough to signal seasonality, but mild compared to Media’s whiplash.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the Media series delivered sharp reversals rather than gentle arcs:

  • Q4 pivot: A steep drop from November to December interrupted typical late-year inflation, with CPI collapsing from 289.8 to 1.22.
  • Q1 whipsaw: January surged to an all-period high (411.0), followed by a February reset to 7.17, then a March rebound to 154.6. Q1 averaged roughly 190.9 for Media versus 9.1 for the global benchmark.
  • Spring firmness: April held near March at 149.2, indicating a brief period of elevated but steadier costs.
  • Early Q3 cooldown: With May–June missing in the series, July reopened at 6.96—its lowest reading since February and 98% below January’s peak.

Meanwhile, the global benchmark showed a cleaner seasonal rhythm: softer in December–January, rebounding in February–April, elevated into mid-year, and near trend by July.

Media vs. Global

Relative to Facebook Ads benchmarks, Media CPI toggled between far above market and materially below:

  • Above market: November (+1,836% vs. global), January (+6,166%), March (+1,764%), April (+1,114%).
  • Below market: December (−89% vs. global), February (−42%), July (−45%).

Across the observed months, Media’s average CPI (~145.7) was over 13x the global average (~11.1). The overall trend for Media fell 98% from November to July, while the global benchmark dipped about 15% over the same span. At its narrowest gap, Media sat about 42–45% below the benchmark (February–July). At its widest, January exceeded the global median by more than 60x. Volatility in Media was orders of magnitude higher than the market, with larger spikes and deeper troughs defining its path.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-app-install benchmarks for the Media industry across all countries—and how they diverge from global patterns—helps marketers interpret country-specific ad costs, CPI trends, and creative-era volatility versus the broader market. This CPI performance view benchmarks Media’s industry ad performance against the global baseline to clarify when costs ran above or below typical Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Media industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.