Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Media

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Media

June 2025 - June 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Media’s cost-per-app-install profile this period tells a clear story of calm interrupted by an extreme spike. Overall, the Media industry (All countries available) mostly ran below the global benchmark for much of the window, then shot dramatically higher in March 2026. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Media in All countries available compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

The selected series begins at $2.90 in December 2025, rises to $13.50 in January 2026, dips to $7.37 in February, and then explodes to $2,313.63 in March 2026. The four-month mean sits at roughly $584 per install, but the median (about $10.44) exposes the extreme skew caused by March’s outlier. In plain terms: three months clustered between $2.90 and $13.50 while one month was more than 300 times larger than the next-highest month.

Comparing to the global baseline (June 2025–June 2026 average ≈ $15.5), Media (All countries available) started well below market in December (≈69% lower than the baseline $9.35 December value), marginally exceeded the baseline in January (+5% vs January baseline $12.83), and then fell back well below in February (≈76% lower than the February baseline $30.13) before the March anomaly vaulted the series to roughly 140× the March baseline ($16.58). Month-to-month momentum highlights: Dec→Jan was a ~+365% lift, Jan→Feb a ~−45% pullback, and Feb→Mar an unprecedented ~+31,300% surge.

Volatility is stark: the selected series’ standard deviation is on the order of $1,150 (mean ≈ $584), producing a coefficient of variation near 200%, driven by the March spike. The baseline series, by contrast, averaged about $15.5 with a standard deviation near $5.3 (CV ≈ 34%), illustrating that Media (All countries available) was roughly six times more volatile this window than the broader baseline sample.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Across the baseline months, typical month-to-month swings stayed in a modest band (roughly $9–$30), showing the more usual seasonal rhythm—soft spots and Q4/Q1 variation but within expectations for CPM analysis and CPC trends. The Media series here behaved like a low-cost pattern through early Q1, then a single-month extreme rewrote the year-to-date picture. That abrupt March divergence breaks the usual seasonality one might expect from Q4 competition or early-Q1 rebounds, converting a quiet cadence into a highly skewed distribution.

Country vs. Global

Framed relatively, Media (All countries available) spent most months below global cost-per-app-install levels (median performance roughly 33% below the global mean during the non-outlier months), then produced an outlier that pushed average performance far above market. Where the baseline was steady and contained, the Media series was more volatile and more prone to episodic spikes. At its narrowest gap, Media sat roughly in line with global levels (January); at its widest, March’s value was about 140× the comparable baseline month.

Understanding cost-per-app-install benchmarks for Media across All countries available contributes to broader Facebook Ads benchmarks and contextualizes CPC trends, CPM analysis, CTR performance, and country-specific ad costs when interpreting industry ad performance.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Media industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.