Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in New Zealand

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in New Zealand

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

New Zealand’s cost per app install (CPI) told a dramatic story across the past 12 months: a steep surge through the holiday tail and into January–February, followed by a sharp reset in Q2 and a brief August flare‑up. Despite spending two‑thirds of the year below the global benchmark, the early‑year spike kept New Zealand’s average CPI slightly above market. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in New Zealand compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across the window, New Zealand’s CPI averaged 15.86, just above the global 15.10. It opened at 11.20 in November 2024 and closed at 9.17 in October 2025, an 18% decline end‑to‑end. The year’s high landed in January at 44.65, while April marked the low at 2.53 — a swing of 42 points.

Momentum was pronounced:

  • November to December nearly doubled (+94%) from 11.20 to 21.70.
  • December to January doubled again (+106%) to the annual peak of 44.65.
  • The market then unwound: February to March dropped 76% (35.06 to 8.57) and again in March to April (−71% to 2.53).
  • A secondary lift arrived in August at 26.78 before easing into September (10.70) and October (9.17).

Volatility was elevated: month‑to‑month absolute moves averaged 10.68 points, notably choppier than the global benchmark’s 6.23. Six of 12 months printed single‑digit CPIs, while two months (January and February) sat above 30.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality was amplified in New Zealand. Q1 carried the load: January–March averaged 29.43, more than triple Q2’s trough at 4.71 (April–June). The mid‑year reset persisted into July (8.36), punctured by an August jump to 26.78, then cooled through early Q4 (10.70 in September, 9.17 in October). This rhythm contrasts with a more measured global cadence, where the high came mid‑year (June at 27.90) and the low in January (7.13). In short: New Zealand’s CPI was spiky around holidays and early Q1, soft across most of Q2, and mixed in late Q3.

Country vs. Global

Relative positioning shifted markedly month by month. New Zealand outpaced the global benchmark in 4 of 12 months (December, January, February, and August) and trailed in the other eight:

  • January was the widest positive gap: +526% above global (44.65 vs. 7.13).
  • April was the widest negative gap: 80% below global (2.53 vs. 12.59).
  • The gap was narrowest in March, when New Zealand sat just 3% below global (8.57 vs. 8.83).

On averages, New Zealand finished about 5% above global CPI (15.86 vs. 15.10), but with roughly 70% higher month‑to‑month volatility. Directionally, the global trend rose from November to October (+21%), while New Zealand drifted lower (−18%), reflecting how a Q1 spike can lift the mean even as the year ends softer.

Closing

For performance marketers tracking Facebook Ads benchmarks, this CPI view shows how country‑specific ad costs in New Zealand diverged from global industry ad performance: outsized Q1 expense, a deep Q2 trough, and a brief August rebound. Understanding cost per app install trends for all industries in New Zealand — alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance — helps contextualize market conditions against the global benchmark.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting New Zealand, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

New Zealand Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 2Day after New Year's Day
Feb 6Waitangi Day
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Easter Monday
Apr 25ANZAC Day
Jun 2King's Birthday
Jun 20Matariki
Oct 27Labour Day
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November–early December (Black Friday/Cyber Monday), Christmas season (Boxing Day sales), Mid‑year promotions (Matariki in June), Back-to-school (late January/early February)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise around Waitangi Day and ANZAC Day as public events increase media consumption. Matariki is new public holiday with growing awareness—advertising may see elevated competition. Late November–December Black Friday/Cyber Monday could drive ad costs significantly. Regional anniversary holidays may cause local inventory shifts.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.