Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Norway

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Norway

July 2025 - July 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction — the headline

Norway’s cost-per-app-install profile over Q4 2025 tells a story of extreme volatility and elevated cost. Across September–December 2025 the median cost-per-app-install in Norway averaged about 40.4 (units consistent with the underlying dataset), roughly 2.6× the global median of ~15.6 across the broader 13‑month baseline. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for All industries in Norway compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Norway began the window at 31.56 in September 2025 and finished at a much higher 72.35 in December — a net increase of ~129% across the period, but not a linear climb. The four‑month median series: 31.56 (Sep), 52.94 (Oct), 4.66 (Nov), 72.35 (Dec) produced an average of 40.38, with a low of 4.66 (November) and a high of 72.35 (December). November is a clear trough, followed by a dramatic rebound into December.

By comparison the global baseline (13 months from June 2025–June 2026) averaged ~15.55, with its own range from ~9.34 (Dec 2025) up to ~30.13 (Feb 2026). Norway’s mean sits about +160% above that overall benchmark, and Norway’s December peak (72.35) is roughly 4.6× the global average.

Month‑to‑month momentum in Norway was jagged: +68% from Sep→Oct, then −91% Oct→Nov, then a +1,454% jump Nov→Dec. Average absolute monthly change in Norway over these three transitions was ~45.8 — more than the Norway mean itself — signaling dramatic swings rather than steady drift.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The four months capture classic Q4 noise but with exaggerated amplitude. September showed a mid‑range cost, October climbed further, November collapsed to a pronounced trough, and December exploded to the period high. The baseline series over the same Sept–Dec window is much smoother (Sep 15.66 → Oct 16.43 → Nov 14.86 → Dec 9.34), illustrating a typical Q4 softening into December for the global median, whereas Norway experienced an outsized December spike.

That November trough and December surge read like short, high‑velocity campaigns or auction shifts concentrated in late Q4, producing a rhythm of rapid decline then sharp rebound rather than gradual seasonal movement.

Country vs. global

Framed against the baseline, Norway is consistently above market levels across this window: the Norway average (~40.4) exceeded the Sep–Dec global mean (~14.1) by roughly 2.9×. At its narrowest gap (November), Norway’s 4.66 was about 67% below the global Dec low of 9.34 — an unusual divergence — but more typically Norway ran materially above global medians (September and October). Volatility comparison is stark: Norway’s average absolute monthly swing (~45.8) is roughly 17× the baseline’s average swing for the same months (~2.6), marking Norway as far more volatile in cost-per-app-install during this period.

Across language and platform contexts referenced in broader reporting, these figures feed into Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends, CPM analysis and CTR performance conversations as part of country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance benchmarking for All industries in Norway.

Understanding cost-per-app-install benchmarks for all industries in Norway helps advertisers evaluate engagement trends and compare performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Norway, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Norway Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 17Constitution Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Singles Day), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), Spring holiday period (April–May travel and tourism)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter and Ascension when Norwegians travel or spend time on leisure. Constitution Day (May 17) is widely celebrated—media activity may increase and ad competition could intensify. Most public holidays result in shop closures; ad inventory may shrink during holidays. Pentecost weekend may reduce weekday competition.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.