Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Norway

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Norway

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The headline in the data is stark: Norway’s median cost per app install (CPI) in April 2025 landed at 911.71 — an extreme outlier versus the global benchmark of 12.59 for the same month. With only a single observed month for Norway, the story is less about local seasonality and more about a one-month spike that towers over typical market levels. By contrast, the global series shows the familiar ebb and flow of acquisition costs across Q1 softness, a midyear surge, and late-year firmness.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Norway compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Norway (all industries): April 2025 CPI of 911.71. With a single data point, the country’s “average,” “high,” and “low” are all the same value, underscoring how singular this reading is.
  • Global benchmark: Over the last 12 months, CPI averaged 15.10, with a low of 7.13 in January 2025 and a high of 27.90 in June 2025. Month‑to‑month movement averaged about 6.23 points, indicating a market that moves but within recognizable bounds.

Relative positioning is the core story. Norway’s April CPI was about 72.4x the global median for that month (roughly +7,140%), and about 60x the global 12‑month average. In other words, the April Norway figure sits far outside the prevailing distribution of Facebook Ads benchmarks for app install costs seen worldwide.

Globally, the arc across the period reflects a winter trough (January at 7.13), a late‑Q2 price crest (June at 27.90), and elevated but uneven levels into early Q4 (August–October ranged from 18.24 to 23.31, before easing to 19.14 in October). Against that backdrop, Norway’s April point reads as an outlier rather than a continuation of the global rhythm.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the global CPI pattern suggests:

  • Softer acquisition costs through early Q1, with January as the low.
  • A rebound through spring, followed by a pronounced June spike.
  • A pullback in July and renewed firmness late Q3 into early Q4 as competition intensifies.

Norway’s single April reading sits well above typical Q2 levels globally, exceeding not only April’s global CPI (12.59) but also the year’s global peak in June (27.90). With only one month available, Norway’s intra‑year seasonality can’t be inferred, but the April placement relative to the global cycle is notably elevated.

Country vs. Global

  • April comparison: Norway at 911.71 versus the global 12.59 — approximately 72–73x above market.
  • Relative to the 12‑month global average (15.10), Norway’s April CPI stands about 60x higher.
  • Global trendlines moved steadily higher from January to June (+291% from the Jan low to the Jun high), with average monthly swings near 6.2 points; Norway’s dataset does not yet show a trend, only an outsized April level.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install in all industries in Norway highlights how country‑specific ad costs can diverge sharply from global CPI trends. While this report centers on CPI, it complements broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, helping marketers situate Norway’s app install costs within the global benchmark landscape.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Norway, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Norway Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 17Constitution Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Singles Day), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), Spring holiday period (April–May travel and tourism)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter and Ascension when Norwegians travel or spend time on leisure. Constitution Day (May 17) is widely celebrated—media activity may increase and ad competition could intensify. Most public holidays result in shop closures; ad inventory may shrink during holidays. Pentecost weekend may reduce weekday competition.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.