Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Norway

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Norway

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

April 2025 delivered a striking outlier for cost per app install (CPI) in Norway: a median of 911.71 for all industries. Against the global Facebook Ads benchmarks—which typically sit in the mid-teens—this single Norwegian data point towers over the market and breaks the usual seasonal rhythm seen worldwide. Globally, CPI eased through early Q1, climbed into April, spiked in June, and then settled into a higher-but-steady late-summer/early-fall band. Norway’s April level stands apart from that pattern.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Norway compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Norway’s readout in April 2025 closed at 911.71 per install. That is roughly 62x the global April median of 14.74—about 6,100% higher. It also exceeds the 12‑month global average of 15.91 by about 57x, and it sits nearly 32x above the global annual high of 27.90 seen in June 2025.

The global time series shows a much tighter, seasonal arc. From November 2024 to November 2025, the global CPI median averaged 15.91, with a low of 7.22 in January and a high of 27.90 in June. The period opened at 17.55 (November 2024) and closed at 17.18 (November 2025), a modest −2% change. Month-to-month volatility averaged 6.29 points, with the sharpest moves in late Q2 and early Q3: +15.85 from May to June and −15.66 from June to July.

April, the month of Norway’s observation, was part of a global uptrend: CPI rose from 9.17 in March to 14.74 in April, a 61% lift, before easing slightly in May and then surging into June’s peak.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Global seasonality in this window follows a familiar rhythm for country-specific ad costs: softer in early Q1 (January trough), a constructive climb into late Q2, a pronounced spike in June, and then a higher plateau through late summer. September and October were elevated (22.72 and 20.72), with November easing to 17.18. Within that cadence, April is a mid-teens month globally—signaling recovery from Q1 without the intensity of June’s peak.

With only one month for Norway, a seasonal profile cannot be established. However, Norway’s April CPI sits far above the typical Q2 range indicated by the global CPM analysis and broader industry ad performance metrics.

Country vs. Global

  • Norway’s April CPI: 911.71 vs. global April 14.74—about 62x higher.
  • Even compared to the global annual high (June’s 27.90), Norway’s April level was ~32x higher (roughly +3,170%).
  • The global trend across the period was broadly stable (−2% from November to November) and moderately volatile (≈6.29 points average monthly swing). Norway’s volatility cannot be assessed with a single data point, but the April value stands as a clear outlier relative to Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-app-install benchmarks for all industries in Norway helps quantify country-specific ad costs and place Norway’s CPI trends in context with the global market. This data-grounded view clarifies how Norway’s April performance compares to global CPI norms and the broader pattern of industry ad performance.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Norway, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Norway Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 17Constitution Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Boxing Day

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday/Singles Day), December (Christmas & post‑Christmas sales), Spring holiday period (April–May travel and tourism)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter and Ascension when Norwegians travel or spend time on leisure. Constitution Day (May 17) is widely celebrated—media activity may increase and ad competition could intensify. Most public holidays result in shop closures; ad inventory may shrink during holidays. Pentecost weekend may reduce weekday competition.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.