See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Cost per app install moved through a clear two-act story: a soft open, a sharp midyear spike, and a late-year cool-down with a January rebound. The year began at $7.10 per install in January 2025, surged to a June peak near $23.76, then reset to the mid-teens through fall before dipping in December and lifting back to $15.39 in January 2026. Across the period, the average settled at roughly $13.60, with sizable month-to-month swings and June standing out as the cost high-water mark.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Public Administration in all countries compared to the global benchmark. The sector-level series for this cut is not separately available here, so the global benchmark serves as the directional proxy for app install costs across Public Administration.
The period opened at $7.10 (January 2025) and closed at $15.39 (January 2026), a gain of roughly 117% from start to end. The median costs averaged about $13.60, ranging from a low of $7.10 in January to a high of $23.76 in June — a $16.66 spread that defined the year’s risk envelope.
Volatility was pronounced. Average absolute monthly movement came in around $4.50, roughly one-third of the mean cost. The steepest jump occurred from May to June (+$11.43), followed immediately by the sharpest drop from June to July (−$12.99), underscoring how quickly pricing pressure built and then released midyear. After July’s retrenchment to $10.77, costs climbed back to $15.61 in August and hovered in the mid‑to‑high teens through October ($16.39). November eased to $14.57, December dipped further to $10.43, and January 2026 rebounded to $15.39. Six of the thirteen months sat above the annual mean, concentrated between late Q3 and early Q4 plus the January 2026 rebound.
The rhythm followed a familiar arc: a soft Q1, an assertive Q2 crescendo, steadier late Q3–Q4 levels, and a year-end dip. Q1 2025 averaged about $9.22, with February briefly lifting costs before March pulled back. Q2 averaged roughly $16.53, powered by the June spike. Q3 landed near $14.18, with July’s reset giving way to a firmer August and September. Q4 averaged approximately $13.80, peaking in October and easing into the holidays, as December marked one of the period’s softest months. The new year re-established mid‑teens costs, suggesting that the late‑year softness was temporary rather than a structural reset.
Because the country selection aggregates all countries and the Public Administration time series is not broken out separately in this file, the sector view maps to the global benchmark for this period. As a result, the relative gap between Public Administration and global cannot be quantified here. What is visible is the market-level pattern: a steady rise overall (+117% from January to January), a midyear inflection with outsized moves, and narrower, sub‑$1 changes at the turn from Q3 to Q4, before holiday softening and a January lift.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install in the Public Administration industry across all countries highlights a year defined by a midyear surge, late‑year softness, and a January rebound. This CPI view complements broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance work by grounding country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance in clear, data-led context.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Public Administration industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app