Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Real Estate

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Real Estate

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, cost-per-app-install moved through the year with a clear mid-year lift, an autumn plateau, and a late-year dip before rebounding. June marked the sharpest surge, while January opened at the lowest point and December closed soft. Volatility wasn’t subtle: several months swung by mid-to-high single digits in dollar terms. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Real Estate in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

Note on coverage: the Real Estate, all-countries time series is not available in this extract. The global benchmark therefore provides the market backdrop for interpreting cost-per-install dynamics.

The story in the data

Global cost per app install averaged about $13.58 across the period (median $13.51). It began at $7.10 in January 2025 and ended at $15.39 in January 2026, a +117% lift year over year. The year’s high arrived in June at $23.76—more than triple the January low and roughly 75% above the overall average. The low was that January start.

Momentum pushed upward in Q1–Q2: January ($7.10) rose to February ($11.63), dipped in March ($8.92), and accelerated through April ($13.51) and May ($12.32) into the June peak ($23.76). A reset followed: July fell back to $10.77, then the market climbed into a mid-teens band—August ($15.61), September ($16.17), and October ($16.39). Costs then softened in November ($14.57) and reached a late-year trough in December ($10.43) before rebounding in January 2026 ($15.39).

Monthly volatility averaged about $4.50 in absolute dollar terms, with the largest single move a June jump of roughly $11.43 versus May. On a percentage basis, average absolute month-over-month change was about 36%, highlighting choppy month-to-month conditions.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The first half averaged about $12.87, buoyed by the outsized June spike. The second half edged higher at about $14.00, but the shape differed: a July reset, a steady mid-teens plateau from August through October, then softer pricing in November–December before a January rebound. Q3 averaged roughly $14.18, Q4 about $13.80. The rhythm—mid-year inflation, autumn stabilization, and a December trough—frames the broader backdrop for app-install pricing. While platform norms often see Q4 competition intensify, this series notably eased into December before snapping back in January.

Country vs. Global

Because the Real Estate, all-countries time series isn’t present here, a direct gap-to-market view (e.g., “above market” or “below market” by percentage) cannot be quantified. In this context, the global curve serves as the benchmark for industry ad performance across markets: a low of $7.10, a high of $23.76, an average around $13.58, and a characteristic pattern of mid-year escalation, late-year softness, and a new-year rebound. Any Real Estate read across all countries would be interpreted against these Facebook Ads benchmarks until industry-specific monthly medians are available.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-app-install benchmarks for the Real Estate industry across all countries helps marketers contextualize country-specific ad costs, compare CPI alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, and recognize how industry ad performance aligns with global patterns over the year.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Real Estate industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.