Compare mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform.
October 2025 - September 2026
Benchmark observations based on the selected data
SaaS & Cloud Platforms cost-per-app-install showed a twin personality over the 13-month window: most months ran meaningfully below the global benchmark, but extreme spikes in early 2026 pushed the year’s mean well above the baseline. Volatility dominated the story — calm, low-cost months punctuated by dramatic surges in January–March 2026 and a rebound in July 2026. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.
This analysis explores ad performance trends for SaaS & Cloud Platforms in All countries available compared to the global benchmark.
The series began at about $3.10 per app install in July 2025 and closed at roughly $11.42 in July 2026. Across the period the mean cost-per-app-install for SaaS & Cloud Platforms was about $35.20, driven up by outliers; the median was far lower, roughly $6.40, reflecting a cluster of low-cost months. The absolute low was ~$1.49 in May 2026; the absolute high was $245.57 in February 2026. Key moves: a measured summer/fall 2025 cadence (mostly $3–$12), a sharp jump to ~$32.6 in January 2026, a dramatic spike to $245.6 in February, a partial retreat to $122.7 in March, then a collapse to single digits in April–June before a mid-July uptick to $11.42. Month-to-month swings were extreme — average absolute change ran on the order of 200% monthly.
Rhythm in the data shows a low-cost window through late spring and early summer (April–June 2026) with the softest point in May. Late-calendar spikes appear clustered in winter: January delivered a notable lift, followed by the head-turning February peak and a high but falling March. After that surge, costs rebounded down into a much quieter spring, then climbed again into July. This sequence produced a stop-start seasonal pattern rather than a steady Q4-to-Q1 narrative: competition and platform dynamics created transient surges rather than a smooth seasonal slope.
Compared to the global benchmark, SaaS & Cloud Platforms undercut the baseline in the majority of months — 10 of 13 months were below the global median — but the January–March 2026 window flipped that picture with outsized increases. On average the baseline across the same months was about $21.8; the selected mean was higher ($35.2) because of the early-2026 outliers, while the selected median (~$6.4) sat below the global median (~$14.9). The tightest gap occurred in August 2025 (only ~6% below the global level). The widest positive deviation was February 2026, when SaaS & Cloud Platforms installs ran roughly +715% above the global benchmark; the largest negative gaps were in May–July 2026 when costs were roughly 85–90% below the baseline. Volatility contrast is stark: month-to-month absolute change averaged ~205% for the SaaS & Cloud series versus ~77% in the global baseline — roughly 2.7× more volatile.
Understanding COST_PER_APP_INSTALL benchmarks for SaaS & Cloud Platforms in All countries available provides context for broader Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends, CPM analysis and country-specific ad costs when evaluating industry ad performance and CTR performance narratives across markets.
Facebook advertising cost benchmarks
Facebook advertising costs vary by industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objective. In the SaaS & Cloud Platforms industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs through regional competition and user engagement. Campaign objectives affect costs because Facebook optimizes delivery for different goals. The data shows median values across multiple campaigns. Results can vary with ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
A small share of campaigns has extremely high CPI values. Those outliers can inflate an average. The median is the midpoint across campaigns, so it better represents a typical result.
The data shows industry median benchmarks. Costs can vary with targeting, creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Analyze Facebook ad performance
See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
Spot creative patterns that affect ROAS.
Create reports without spreadsheets.
The dataset includes over $3B in Facebook ad spend from thousands of ad accounts that use Superads to analyze and improve campaigns. Every data point is anonymized and aggregated. It does not expose an individual advertiser.
The dataset updates as new ad data is available.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos that show app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals can lower CPI.
Optimizing for installs increases volume. Optimizing for actions such as signups or purchases brings higher-quality users. Choose based on your goals and the importance of post-install behavior.
Align creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude people who already installed. Test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users rather than all installers.
Compare cost benchmarks for Facebook advertising metrics.
Cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across markets
Click-through rate benchmarks for Facebook Ads
Cost per lead benchmarks across markets
Cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
App install cost benchmarks