Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks in Sweden

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install in Sweden

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Sweden’s cost per app install tells a story of rapid compression against a steadier global backdrop. Across the available 2025 readings, Sweden started the year extremely above market, moved toward parity by June, and then undershot the world benchmark sharply by November. The arc is dramatic: a January peak at 76.79 falls to 24.49 by June and lands at just 3.04 in November. Meanwhile, the global benchmark rose into a mid‑year high before normalizing into Q4, showing far gentler swings.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Sweden compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point vs. ending point: Sweden’s CPI opened at 76.79 in January and fell to 3.04 by November, a peak‑to‑trough decline of about 96%.
  • Average level: Sweden averaged 44.65 across the observed months (January–June, November), versus 13.11 for the global benchmark across those same months—about 3.4x higher overall.
  • Highs and lows: The high was January (76.79). After a spring plateau around the mid‑40s (March–May), costs dropped to 24.49 in June. November marked the low at 3.04.
  • Month-to-month moves: Absolute month‑over‑month movement in Sweden averaged 13.19 points across observed transitions, notably more volatile than the global benchmark’s 5.61 over the same spans. The steepest Swedish declines came in February→March (−24.26), May→June (−23.30), and June→November (−21.45).

By contrast, the global series climbed from 7.07 in January to a June high of 23.76 (+236%), then eased to 14.57 by November (−39% from June), and 9.32 in December.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The Sweden curve shows three distinct phases:

  • Early-year premium: January and February were elevated (76.79 and 69.37), far above the market.
  • Spring stabilization: March through May held in a narrow band (45.11–47.80), signaling a temporary plateau.
  • Mid-year reset and late-year compression: Costs nearly halved from May to June (47.80 → 24.49), and the next available reading in November fell to 3.04—its lowest mark of the year.

The global rhythm followed a more familiar pattern for Facebook Ads benchmarks: a steady rise into a mid‑year peak (June) followed by a cooling period into Q4, rather than a cliff‑like decline.

Country vs. Global

  • Magnitude: Sweden ran far above market early—about 10.9x the global level in January and 6.0x in February. The gap narrowed through spring (≈3.4x–3.9x in April–May).
  • Convergence: By June, Sweden was roughly at parity with the world (+3% vs. global).
  • Undershoot: In November, Sweden flipped to 79% below the global benchmark (3.04 vs. 14.57).
  • Volatility: Sweden’s average absolute monthly shift (13.19 points) was about 2.4x larger than the global series across comparable intervals, indicating a choppier path even as overall levels converged and then inverted.

In short, the global trend rose steadily (+236% January→June) before easing, while Sweden descended unevenly (−68% January→June; −88% June→November), ending well below the market.

Closing

For Facebook Ads benchmarks, Sweden’s all‑industry cost per app install in 2025 moved from extreme premiums to pronounced discounts versus the global average—high in Q1, aligned by mid‑year, and sharply lower by November. Understanding cost per app install trends for all industries in Sweden provides a clear view of country‑specific ad costs and how local acquisition pricing diverged from global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Sweden, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Sweden Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Jan 6Epiphany
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 1Labour Day
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 6National Day
Jun 21Midsummer Day
Nov 1All Saints' Day
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Late November (Black Friday is huge), December (Christmas and post-Christmas sales), June (Midsummer seasonal promotions), January (Winter sale season)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPMs might spike during Black Friday and early December, especially in e‑commerce and fashion. Easter and Midsummer holidays often decrease weekday inventory but increase media usage during long weekends. Midsummer tends to be quiet in retail but active in travel and food sectors. Post-Christmas sales in January still see high digital ad demand.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.