Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Textiles

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Textiles

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Cost per App Install moved on a rising, uneven track across the global market. The year opened at its lowest level, accelerated into a pronounced mid‑year spike, steadied through early fall, then softened into December before rebounding at the start of 2026. Volatility was noticeable, with one of the sharpest swings occurring between June and July. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Textiles in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

Note: Textiles across all countries did not surface as a distinct time series in this window, so the narrative below reflects the global Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per App Install as directional context for industry ad performance.

The story in the data

Across January 2025 to January 2026, median Cost per App Install averaged about 13.58, starting at 7.10 in January 2025 and ending at 15.39 in January 2026—an increase of roughly 117%. The series peaked at 23.76 in June and bottomed at 7.10 in January, a range of about 16.7 and a peak roughly 3.3x the low. After the June high, costs fell sharply to 10.77 in July, then rebuilt into the mid‑teens, reaching 16.39 by October before easing to 10.43 in December and rebounding to 15.39 in January 2026.

Month-to-month moves averaged about 4.50 points, signaling a market more restless than flat. The most dramatic changes were the surge from May to June (+11.43) and the correction from June to July (−12.99). The calmest stretch arrived in early fall, with incremental gains from August to October (+0.57 then +0.22), suggesting a short plateau before the year-end dip.

Quarterly rhythms underline the narrative: Q1 2025 averaged 9.22 (the trough), Q2 16.53 (the peak, driven by June), Q3 14.18 (stabilization), and Q4 13.80 (softening into the holidays, pulled down by December).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The global series followed a familiar arc for app install economics: a soft Q1 foundation, a Q2 spike as budgets scale and conversion intent firms, and a late‑year cooldown. June stood out as an outlier high before a sharp July correction, after which the market settled into mid‑teens territory through September and October. November eased and December marked the second‑lowest month of the back half, a notable contrast to typical Q4 buying pressure. The new year reopened at a firmer 15.39, well above the prior January.

Country vs. Global

Because the selected cut is Textiles across all countries and the dataset does not include a separate industry time series for this period, no direct gap versus the all‑industry global benchmark can be computed. Practically, the global curve above represents the baseline for country‑specific ad costs and broader CPM analysis that often shapes CPI. If Textiles tracked the market, it would have encountered the same mid‑year spike, early fall steadiness, and year‑end softness, with overall CPI rising from early‑year lows to a higher starting point in 2026.

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per App Install show a year defined by a Q2 surge, mid‑teens consolidation, and a December dip, with a strong reopen in January 2026. Understanding Cost per App Install benchmarks for the Textiles industry across all countries helps marketers read CPI momentum and compare industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Textiles industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.