Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Textiles

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Textiles

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The headline in the data: Cost Per App Install (CPI) moved from a soft start to a mid‑year spike, then cooled into year end. Across all countries, the global benchmark for Facebook Ads app install costs averaged about $13.37 in 2025, opening at just $7.07 in January, peaking at $23.76 in June, and closing at $9.32 in December. The path was choppy—big lifts into late Q2, a sharp July reset, steadier late summer, and a clear Q4 fade. Month-to-month volatility averaged roughly $4.57, with June and July marking the most dramatic swing.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for the Textiles industry across all countries compared to the global benchmark for CPI.

Note: The Textiles segment across all countries does not have a complete month-by-month series in this window, so the narrative below uses the global curve as directional context for industry ad performance.

Section 1: The story in the data

Starting at $7.07 in January and ending at $9.32 in December, CPI rose 32% over the year, but the journey was not linear. The annual average landed at $13.37 (median $12.92), with a wide range from the June high of $23.76 to the January low—about a 3.4x spread.

Key movements:

  • February jumped to $11.63, then March cooled to $8.91.
  • April–May climbed into the low teens ($13.51, $12.32), setting up the June spike to $23.76 (+$11.43 month over month, +93%).
  • July corrected to $10.77 (−$12.99, −55%), before a mid‑teens rebound in August ($15.99).
  • September and October held steady near $16.16 and $16.43—the calmest stretch of the year (changes of just +$0.17 and +$0.27).
  • November eased to $14.57, and December dropped to $9.32 (−$5.26, −36% from November).

On average, absolute month-to-month shifts were about 36%—a clear signal of instability around a mid‑teens center, punctuated by a June spike and a late‑year slide.

Section 2: Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality appeared in distinct phases:

  • Q1 was the trough (average $9.21), with softer engagement costs anchoring the year’s low.
  • Q2 surged (average $16.53) almost entirely on the strength of June, indicating elevated competition or conversion pricing pressure mid‑year.
  • Q3 sustained mid‑teens costs (average $14.31), with late‑summer stability in September–October.
  • Q4 was mixed: October touched the quarter’s high ($16.43), November eased ($14.57), and December fell to $9.32—a pronounced reset from October (−43%).

This rhythm—the early trough, a pronounced mid‑year spike, and a year‑end cool‑down—frames the CPI pattern more than a smooth seasonal slope.

Section 3: Country vs. Global

Because the selected scope is “all countries,” there is no country-specific curve to contrast with the global baseline. And because Textiles data is not fully populated month by month, an explicit gap versus the all‑industry global benchmark cannot be quantified here. Directionally, the market rose sharply from Q1 to Q3 (+55% from $9.21 to $14.31 on quarterly averages), then eased into Q4 (−6% from Q3’s $14.31 to Q4’s $13.44), with the sharpest divergence concentrated in June–July and the narrowest gap during September–October. Any above‑market or below‑average positioning for Textiles across all countries cannot be inferred without the complete segment series.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per App Install in the Textiles industry across all countries—anchored to the global curve—highlights a year defined by a mid‑year spike, late‑summer steadiness, and a Q4 reset. For marketers tracking CPI alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, this global view offers directional context for industry ad performance and country‑specific ad costs across the Textiles category.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Textiles industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.