Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Wellness & Holistic Health

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Wellness & Holistic Health

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Wellness & Holistic Health app install costs spent most of the year below the global benchmark, with a pronounced mid-year swell and a secondary Q4 flare before easing into December. Costs per install were comparatively steady versus the broader market, but the category still traced a clear rise-and-cool rhythm: a sharp lift into June, a softer late summer, and an October spike that didn’t hold into the holidays. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wellness & Holistic Health across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Median Cost Per App Install (CPI) for Wellness & Holistic Health averaged $10.25 across all countries in 2025, ranging from a low of $5.54 in January to a high of $16.33 in June. The year opened soft at $5.54, climbed through late spring ($7.14 in April, $10.04 in May), then surged to the June peak (+195% versus January). Costs retreated into July ($11.29) and August ($10.95), rose again to $15.95 in October, and eased into $10.65 in November before landing at $7.54 in December—still 36% above January but well off the mid-year peak.

Month-to-month volatility averaged $2.93, with the sharpest swings around the June surge (+$6.29 from May) and subsequent cooldowns (−$5.04 into July, −$5.30 into November). The category’s annual trajectory was defined by two crests (June and October) and a relatively gentle December finish compared to the broader market’s more pronounced swings.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the category followed a familiar app-install pattern: a Q1 trough, an assertive run-up through late Q2, and a mixed Q4. June marked the yearly high, aligning with broader auction intensity mid-year. After a late-summer breather, an October flare suggested renewed competition or heightened conversion appetite, but momentum faded quickly in November and December. In effect, pricing heat concentrated in two windows—early summer and early Q4—while January, March–April, and December offered the softest CPIs of the year.

Country vs. Global

Compared to the global all-industry benchmark, Wellness & Holistic Health operated at lower country-aggregated costs most of the year. The category’s $10.25 average trailed the global $13.37 by about 23%, with lower CPIs in 11 of 12 months. The narrowest gap came in October (−3% vs. global), and July was the lone month above market (+5%). The widest discount appeared in April (−47%).

Both series spiked in June, but the global benchmark rose higher ($23.76 vs. $16.33). Baseline volatility averaged $4.57—noticeably choppier than Wellness & Holistic Health’s $2.93—driven by steeper mid-year surges and resets. From January to December, both ended above their starting points (+36% for Wellness & Holistic Health; +32% for the global benchmark), though the global path was more turbulent.

Closing

These Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per App Install show Wellness & Holistic Health across all countries running consistently below global, with mid-year and early Q4 peaks and comparatively lower volatility. Understanding CPI trends for Wellness & Holistic Health across all countries helps marketers anchor country-specific ad costs, compare industry ad performance to global norms, and contextualize broader Facebook Ads benchmarks alongside evolving CPM analysis and CTR performance patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wellness & Holistic Health industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.