See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all countries, Cost Per App Install (CPI) for the Wine and Spirits industry followed a choppy, high-amplitude path: a deep early-year trough, a dramatic mid-year spike, and a late-summer plateau before easing into October. Monthly medians averaged 14.16 over the period, with CPI starting at 14.97 in November 2024 and ending at 14.65 in October 2025—a slight 2% net decline despite large swings in between. The standout moments were a January low (6.56) and a June high (27.78), a more than 4x spread that shaped the year’s narrative. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The period opened at 14.97 in November 2024, then fell into December (10.86, −27%) and bottomed in January at 6.56 (−40% month over month). A rebound followed: February jumped to 12.33 (+88% from January) before slipping to 8.29 in March. Spring steadied near the teens—April at 12.28 and May at 10.90—before a dramatic surge in June to 27.78, the annual high and 96% above the full-period average. From there, CPI halved to 12.69 in July (−54%), then climbed into a late-summer plateau: 19.08 in August and 19.53 in September, before easing to 14.65 in October.
Across the 12 months, CPI averaged 14.16, ranging from 6.56 (January) to 27.78 (June). Seven months sat below the average (December, January, February, March, April, May, July), while five were above (November, June, August, September, October). Month-to-month volatility averaged 6.12 points, with relative swings averaging about 49%—dominated by the May-to-June leap (+155%) and the June-to-July retrace (−54%). The narrowest deviations from the average occurred in October (+3%) and November (+6%).
The rhythm resembled a classic annual arc for app acquisition costs. Late Q4 softened into January, with CPI compressing steadily from November through the January trough. Early Q1 showed a quick rebound but remained below the full-period mean. Spring hovered in the low teens, then mid-year tightened sharply: June set the high-water mark, followed by a reset in July and a resilient Q3 where CPI held materially above average in August and September. By October, costs normalized close to the starting point, suggesting a return to baseline after the mid-year turbulence.
Because this view aggregates all countries, the series can be read as the global Facebook Ads benchmark for Wine and Spirits CPI over this window. Against the period’s global average of 14.16, monthly medians ranged from 54% below average (January) to 96% above average (June). The gap to average was narrowest in October (+3%) and November (+6%), while late summer ran well above average—August at +35% and September at +38%. The amplitude from low to high (4.2x) and the average month-to-month move (6.12 points) underscore a more jagged path than a smooth seasonal curve, with mid-year auction pressure standing out as the defining feature.
Understanding Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install benchmarks for the Wine and Spirits industry across all countries helps quantify country-specific ad costs in aggregate, frame CPI trends against a global baseline, and situate acquisition costs alongside related CPM analysis and CTR performance within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app