Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per App Install Benchmarks for Wine and Spirits

See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform

Cost Per App Install for Wine and Spirits

June 2025 - June 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across the period from June 2025 to June 2026, Wine and Spirits app-install economics were choppy versus typical steady-seasonality stories. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits in All countries available compared to the global benchmark.

The headline: median Cost Per App Install (CPI) averaged roughly $15.54 over the 13 months, but that average masks heavy swings — a deep trough in December 2025 and a sharp, short-lived spike in February 2026. Volatility and a pronounced rebound pattern around the new-year period are the most notable features.

The story in the data

Starting point (June 2025) sat at about $18.36 per install and finished (June 2026) near $11.65 — a net decline of roughly 36.5% from start to finish. Over the window the series hit a low of about $9.35 (December 2025) and a high of $30.13 (February 2026). That peak was roughly 3.2× the trough.

Monthly momentum shows several clear moves: a steep fall from June into July 2025 (−54% roughly), a modest mid-year recovery through October, a December low, then a dramatic spike in February (+135% versus January) followed by a sharp retrenchment in March (−45% versus February). Average month-to-month absolute change was about $5.56, signaling material month-level swings rather than a steady trend. The median CPI across months was near the average, underscoring the outsized influence of the February spike on the mean.

Keywords visible in this narrative include Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends, CPM analysis and CTR performance as companion metrics marketers track alongside CPI in industry ad performance reviews.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the dataset suggests a year-end softening with the lowest CPI in December 2025, followed by an early-year disruption: a strong rebound into January and then an anomalous February surge. The February peak and immediate March contraction create a jagged early-Q1 rhythm rather than a smooth Q1 rebound. Spring months (March–May) show a cooling from the February extreme, settling back toward the $14–$19 band before easing into June.

The pattern implies pronounced monthly competition and price sensitivity in specific windows; month-to-month swings outpaced what a steady quarterly model would predict, making the rhythm more volatile than typical CPC trends or CPM analysis alone might suggest.

Country vs. Global

Because the provided selected dataset for a single country was not supplied, the baseline here represents the aggregate across all countries available for Wine and Spirits. Relative phrasing: the Wine and Spirits CPI series for All countries available showed higher volatility than many broad-market Facebook Ads benchmarks — peak-to-trough spread exceeded $20 and monthly swings averaged more than $5. At its narrowest dispersion the CPI clustered around the mean ($15.5); at its widest, months like February diverged by roughly +94% above the average.

This depiction highlights how industry ad performance can differ by metric: CPI for Wine and Spirits displayed sharper spikes and retracements than might be observed in CPC trends or CPM analysis for more stable categories, reinforcing the role of country-specific ad costs and calendar effects in industry ad performance.

Closing

Understanding Cost Per App Install benchmarks for Wine and Spirits across All countries available gives a clear view of seasonal swings, volatility, and how CPI compares to broader Facebook Ads benchmarks for industry ad performance and country-specific ad costs.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What's a good CPI for iOS vs Android in 2025?

iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.

Why is my app install cost higher in some countries?

Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.

What creatives drive the lowest CPI on Facebook?

Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.

Should I optimize for installs or in-app actions?

Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.

How do I lower CPI without tanking app retention or quality?

Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.