See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
In 2025, Facebook Ads cost per app install traced a classic surge-and-settle rhythm: a low-cost kickoff, a sharp spring escalation, and a calmer autumn plateau before a year-end retreat. Costs started at $7.07 in January, crested at $23.76 in June, and closed at $9.32 in December — a 3.4x swing from trough to peak and a 32% lift from start to finish. The annual median hovered at $13.37, with half the months landing above that line. This pattern reads as a mid‑year run-up in acquisition costs followed by a late-year cooldown.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The year opened soft: $7.07 in January, then a rebound to $11.63 in February before easing to $8.91 in March. Spring delivered decisive momentum — April jumped to $13.51 and May held at $12.32 before a dramatic June spike to $23.76 (+93% month over month). That high-water mark was immediately corrected in July, which fell to $10.77 (−55% from June). Late summer stabilized: August rose to $15.99, September edged to $16.16, and October nudged to $16.43, forming a narrow band around the mid‑teens. November softened to $14.57, and December stepped down to $9.32 (−36% versus November).
Across the year, average absolute month‑to‑month movement was $4.57 — about 34% of the annual average — signaling meaningful volatility. The smallest move came from August to September (+$0.17), followed by a gentle October lift (+$0.27). The largest swings clustered mid‑year: June’s surge (+$11.43) and July’s correction (−$12.99). Six months sat above the annual average ($13.37), with February, April, May, and November forming the steadier middle, and January, June, and December anchoring the extremes.
Seasonality sorted into clear chapters:
Taken together, H2 averaged $13.87 versus $12.87 in H1 — roughly an 8% higher back half — but the calmer cadence from August through November contrasted with the dramatic spring-to-summer run-up. While many markets see Q4 tighten, this series eased into December.
While this readout focuses on cost per install (CPI), performance marketers often triangulate it with CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance to interpret acquisition efficiency and country-specific ad costs within broader industry ad performance.
Because this cut aggregates Wine and Spirits across all countries and only the benchmark series is available here, the curve shown represents the global benchmark itself. As a result, the monthly gap to “global” is effectively zero throughout the year, and the volatility profile — an average $4.57 month‑to‑month move — is identical in both views. Any divergence between Wine and Spirits and the all‑industry market isn’t observable in this release, but the timing of peaks and troughs provides a clear reference for Facebook Ads benchmarks on CPI.
Understanding Facebook Ads cost per app install benchmarks for the Wine and Spirits industry across all countries highlights a year defined by a spring surge, a June peak at $23.76, and a late‑year cooldown to $9.32, with an annual average of $13.37. These CPI trends offer a grounded lens for comparing Wine and Spirits industry ad performance to global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app