See how your app install costs compare. Explore mobile acquisition cost benchmarks by industry, region, and platform
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Global cost per app install for Facebook Ads moved through a year of sharp peaks and troughs, with a deep January low, a dramatic June spike, and a late‑summer plateau that eased into November. From November 2024 to November 2025, the benchmark effectively finished where it started, slipping just 2% year over year, but the path between those endpoints was unusually choppy. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Wine and Spirits across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The period opens at $17.55 in November 2024 and closes at $17.18 in November 2025 (−2%). The global average across the 13 months was $15.91 per install, with a standard deviation of $5.80 and an average month‑to‑month swing of $6.29—evidence of meaningful volatility around the mean.
The year’s low arrived in January 2025 at $7.22, followed by a sharp rebound to $12.87 in February (+78%) and a pullback in March to $9.17 (−29%). Costs climbed into April ($14.74), softened in May ($12.05), and then surged to the period’s high in June at $27.90—almost a 3x lift from January’s trough. July retraced to $12.24 (−56% from June), before late‑summer costs stepped up again: $19.88 in August and $22.72 in September. Q4 opened elevated at $20.72 in October and cooled to $17.18 in November; December of the prior year sat lower at $12.61.
Range and rhythm stand out. The span from low ($7.22) to high ($27.90) covered $20.68—roughly 130% of the annual average. The sharpest month‑over‑month moves clustered mid‑year (June’s +132% vs. May; July’s −56% vs. June), while October showed one of the milder shifts (−9% vs. September).
Seasonality tracked a “soft Q1, spiky mid‑year, firm late Q3” pattern. Q1 averaged $9.75, well below the annual mean, reflecting a trough through January and uneven recovery into March. Q2 averaged $18.23, but that figure hides a split personality: relatively moderate April–May followed by an outsized June peak. Q3 averaged $18.95, with costs holding in a higher band ($12–$23) and peaking in September. Q4 averaged $16.84 (using October–November 2025 and December 2024), opening strong in October before moderating into November and a notably softer December.
This cadence is consistent with broader Facebook Ads benchmarks: engagement and CPC trends do not always map to CPI, but the competitive intensity visible in CPM analysis around mid‑year and early Q4 often coincides with higher app‑install costs. CTR performance can stabilize when costs rise, but in this window CPI clearly bore the brunt of market swings.
For Wine and Spirits across all countries, a category‑specific series was not available in this cut, so the comparison to the all‑industry global benchmark cannot be quantified directly. The global pattern offers a directional proxy: a −2% finish from November to November, a 287% climb from the January low to the June high, and a late‑summer cost band roughly 30% above the annual average. The narrowest month‑to‑month gap occurred in early Q4 (October to November), while the widest separations clustered around the June–July whipsaw.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per app install in the Wine and Spirits industry across all countries helps marketers interpret country‑specific ad costs and compare category ad performance to global patterns. This CPI read, grounded in our $3B dataset, outlines the mid‑year spike, Q3 firmness, and Q4 cooling that shaped app‑install economics for the period.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Wine and Spirits industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
iOS CPIs often range from $2 to $5 or more. Android is usually cheaper, between $1 and $3. Your CPI will depend on geo, creative, and optimization goal.
Some regions like the US, UK, and Canada have higher competition and stricter privacy regulations, which drive up costs. Countries with lower purchasing power typically have cheaper CPIs.
Short videos showing app benefits, UGC-style content, and localized messaging tend to perform best. Clear CTAs and fast-paced visuals help lower your CPI.
Optimizing for installs gets volume, but optimizing for actions like signups or purchases brings higher quality users. It depends on your goals and how much post-install behavior matters.
Align your creative with the app experience, avoid misleading ads, and exclude users who already installed. You can also test lookalike audiences based on high-quality users, not just all installers.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app