Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Agriculture

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Agriculture

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Cost per lead in the Agriculture industry ran well below the broader market for most of the year, punctuated by a sharp January spike and a late‑summer trough. After surging to a yearly high in January, Agriculture CPL cooled into the teens and low $20s, touching its floor in September before lifting into October. The pattern is choppier and more counter‑seasonal than the global benchmark, which climbed steadily into late summer.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Agriculture in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to ending point: Agriculture CPL opened at $11.89 in November 2024 and closed at $19.32 in October 2025, a 63% increase across the window.
  • Highs and lows: The series peaked at $54.34 in January and bottomed at $11.89 in November (with a near‑match at $11.95 in September). The full range spanned $42.45.
  • Average level: Agriculture averaged $22.46 per lead across the 12 months, versus the global benchmark’s $40.94.
  • Key movements: December rose 39% month over month, January surged +231%, then February retraced −47%. Additional notable shifts included April (−41%), May (+52%), September (−38%), and October (+62%).
  • Volatility: Average absolute month‑to‑month movement was $10.18, more than triple the global series’ $3.22—evidence of sharper swings within Agriculture even outside the January spike.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The year’s rhythm was unconventional. A Q1 surge set the tone: Agriculture’s Q1 average reached $35.72, roughly on par with the global $36.47, but it achieved that parity through an extreme January peak and rapid normalization in February–March. Q2 softened to a $21.12 average, and Q3 drifted lower to $17.12, culminating in September’s low. October delivered a rebound to $19.32 as Q4 began.

By contrast, the global benchmark rose steadily through summer—typical of tightening auctions and rising competition—peaking in September at $48.29 before easing to $45.08 in October. Agriculture’s CPL, however, declined through mid‑year and late summer, then lifted into October, a counter‑seasonal cadence relative to the broader market.

Agriculture vs. Global

  • Levels: Agriculture averaged $22.46, 45% below the global $40.94. It trailed the market in 11 of 12 months.
  • The exception: January was the only month above market—$54.34 in Agriculture versus $35.74 globally, a 52% premium.
  • Monthly gap: Agriculture typically ran 40–60% below global CPLs; the narrowest gap appeared in March (−19% vs. global), and the widest in September (−75%).
  • Momentum: The global trend rose +16% from November to September before easing in October (−7% vs. September). Agriculture’s path was choppier, sliding −56% from March to September before a +62% rebound into October.
  • Stability: With an average monthly swing of $10.18 versus the global benchmark’s $3.22, Agriculture was materially more volatile, even when excluding the January outlier.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in the Agriculture industry across all countries shows a year marked by a dramatic January spike, mid‑year softness, and a late‑summer trough well below the global market. While CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance provide additional context, this CPL view highlights industry ad performance and country‑aggregated ad costs relative to global Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Agriculture industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.