Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Agriculture

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Agriculture

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Agriculture’s cost-per-lead story in Facebook Ads through 2025 is one of compression and volatility: a dramatic spike to start the year, followed by a steady descent into year-end, consistently cheaper than the global all‑industry benchmark. After January’s unusually high CPL, the category settled into the high-teens to low‑20s for most of the year, with a final leg down in Q4. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Agriculture across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Agriculture began 2025 at a high-water mark: CPL hit $58.63 in January, the category’s peak for the year. From there, costs fell sharply to $24.51 in February (a $34 drop month over month) and never returned to January levels. The year ended at $8.48 in December — the low — marking an 86% decline from January to December.

Across 2025, Agriculture’s CPL averaged $22.89, with a wide 6.9x range between the high ($58.63) and low ($8.48). Excluding January’s spike, the February–December average was $19.64. Notable inflection points included a modest rebound in May ($24.57), stabilization in July ($22.79), a dip to $12.16 in September, and a brief October lift to $20.76 before sliding to the December trough.

Volatility was pronounced: the average absolute month-to-month move was $7.9, more than double the global benchmark’s $3.1. The largest monthly swing was January to February (−$34.12), while the biggest uptick came from September to October (+$8.60).

For context, the global all‑industry benchmark averaged $41.53 over the same period, with a far narrower range (roughly 1.5x between its high and low).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Agriculture showed a Q1 comedown after an outsized January, averaging $36.89 across the quarter but driven by that first-month spike. Q2 and Q3 settled into a tighter band, with Q2 averaging $21.75 and Q3 averaging $17.69, mostly in the teens and low‑20s. Q4 brought a brief October lift before re-accelerating downward: the quarter averaged $15.23, ending at the year’s lowest CPL in December.

This diverged from typical marketplace pressure: while the broader market often tightens in Q4, Agriculture’s CPL continued to ease into year-end.

Country vs. Global

Agriculture across all countries ran materially below the global benchmark for 11 of 12 months. Only January sat above market (+67% versus global). The gap was narrowest in March (−18% below global) and widest in December (−80%). Overall, Agriculture’s average CPL trailed the global all‑industry norm by about 45% ($22.89 vs. $41.53). Trend lines diverged as well: the global benchmark climbed from January into the fall (+39% from January to October), while Agriculture fell steadily over the year (−86% January to December) and was more volatile throughout.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in the Agriculture industry across all countries shows a year defined by early spikes, midyear stabilization, and year-end easing — consistently below the global market. This CPL-focused benchmark, alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance context, helps frame industry ad performance against global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Agriculture industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.