Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Agriculture

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Agriculture

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Agriculture’s cost-per-lead story in 2025 moves in the opposite direction of the broader market. While the global benchmark climbed steadily through the year and peaked in Q4, Agriculture across all available countries saw CPLs step down quarter by quarter, finishing the year at their lowest point. The category also showed sharper month-to-month swings than the global composite, with an early-year spike and a brief October rebound standing out in an otherwise consistent glide downward.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Agriculture across all available countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Agriculture began the year with a high CPL of $58.63 in January and ended at $7.24 in December — an 88% decline from start to finish. The annual average landed at $22.78, with the year’s high in January ($58.63) and the low in December ($7.24). The range was wide at $51.39, underscoring the category’s variability.

Month to month, the narrative unfolded in distinct movements: a steep correction in February ($24.51, down 58% from January), a modest lift in March ($27.54), a dip in April ($18.13), and a rebound in May ($24.57). Midyear steadiness in June–July (~$22.54–$22.79) gave way to renewed easing in August–September ($18.12 → $12.16). October bucked the slide with a jump to $20.76 (+71% from September), before CPLs fell again in November ($16.26) and reached their annual trough in December ($7.24).

Volatility averaged about $8.00 in absolute month-to-month movement, notably sharper than the $3.24 average swing in the global dataset, indicating a choppier ride for Agriculture’s lead costs even as the broader market moved in tighter bands.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Agriculture traced a clear staircase pattern lower across the year. Quarterly averages illustrate the rhythm: Q1 averaged $36.90, Q2 $21.75, Q3 $17.69, and Q4 $14.75. January was an outlier to the upside, while December set the annual low, with a brief October rebound interrupting an otherwise persistent descent.

In a period when marketwide competition typically intensifies in Q4, Agriculture’s CPL continued to ease, declining from October to December and closing the year far below earlier levels. The softest stretch landed in late Q3 to Q4, particularly September and December, while the first quarter — and January specifically — stood as the costliest time to acquire leads.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, Agriculture’s CPL was materially lower for most of the year. On average, Agriculture came in at $22.78 versus the global $41.46 — about 45% below market. The gap narrowed most in March (17% below the benchmark) and widened to its largest in December (82% below). Only January ran above market, with Agriculture’s $58.63 sitting 67% higher than the $35.08 global level.

Trajectory also differed: the global trend rose +17% from January to December (from $35.08 to $41.13), peaking around October, while Agriculture fell sharply across the same span (−88%). The category was also more volatile, with average monthly moves of ~$8 compared to ~$3 for the global composite. In Q4, the contrast was stark: global CPL hovered around $49 in September–November before easing to $41 in December, while Agriculture averaged $14.75 in the quarter and sat 58%–82% below global levels from September through year-end.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Lead in the Agriculture industry across all available countries highlights a year defined by consistent declines, intermittent rebounds, and notably lower country-specific ad costs versus the global market. This CPL analysis situates Agriculture’s industry ad performance within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks, offering a clear read on 2025 CPL trends relative to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Agriculture industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.