Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Agriculture

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Agriculture

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Agriculture’s cost-per-lead (CPL) told a distinctly different story from the global benchmark: consistently cheaper leads, but with sharper swings and a dramatic late-year drop. The year opened with a rare spike, then eased into a low-cost stretch through summer before collapsing to the lowest level of the period in November. Meanwhile, the overall market climbed into late Q3 and then cooled. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Agriculture across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Agriculture CPL started at $11.89 in November 2024 and ended at just $2.24 in November 2025, an 81% year-over-year decline. The period averaged $20.91, with a high of $54.34 in January and a low of $2.24 in November. The sharpest moves clustered around those bookends: December-to-January surged +230%, February retraced −53%, April dipped another −41%, September fell −38% from August, October rebounded +62%, and November collapsed −88% month over month.

Volatility was pronounced. Month-to-month absolute movement averaged $10.8, roughly 2.5x more volatile than the global benchmark’s $4.23. By contrast, the global benchmark averaged $39.83 CPL, peaked at $47.62 in September, troughed at $28.58 in November, and declined from $41.51 in November 2024 to $28.58 in November 2025 (−31% year over year).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The Agriculture series featured an atypical January bulge ($54.34) followed by a reversion to a cheaper, steadier band through late spring and summer ($16–$25 from April to August). Q3 softened further, bottoming at $11.95 in September, then briefly firmed in October before the sharp November drop to $2.24.

The global benchmark moved differently: CPLs gradually tightened into late Q3, rising from $35.73 in January to $47.62 in September (+33%), then eased in October and fell more steeply in November. The rhythm here is familiar in Facebook Ads benchmarks—costs often rise with increased competition into late Q3, while late Q4 can bifurcate by objective. In this window, Agriculture’s CPL behaved counter-cyclically: lower midyear, softer into September, and exceptionally low in November.

Country vs. Global

Across all countries, Agriculture CPL undercut the global benchmark by roughly half on average (−47% vs. $39.83 globally). The gap narrowed the most in March (Agriculture $27.12 vs. global $33.27, −18%) and flipped positive only in January, when Agriculture ran 52% above the market ($54.34 vs. $35.73). At its widest, the gap hit −92% in November ($2.24 vs. $28.58). Trend-wise, the global curve climbed steadily into September, while Agriculture’s path was choppier—spiking early, settling through midyear, and finishing the period at an extreme low.

While CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance provide broader context for country-specific ad costs, this view isolates cost-per-lead to clarify how industry ad performance in Agriculture compares to the overall market.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Lead in the Agriculture industry across all countries highlights a market that is generally far cheaper than the global average, but notably more volatile—punctuated by a January spike and a record-low November finish. This perspective helps frame CPL dynamics for Agriculture relative to global patterns across the full year.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Agriculture industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.