Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in Argentina

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in Argentina

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Argentina’s cost-per-lead profile in 2025 reads as a study in contrasts: consistently inexpensive versus the global benchmark for most of the year, punctuated by a sharp Q4 surge centered on October. Across all industries, Argentina averaged 17.8 per lead, sharply below the global 2025 average of 41.5, yet it also delivered one of the year’s most dramatic single-month spikes at 86.3 in October. The year began and ended at nearly the same level (10.5 in January to 10.1 in December), but the path between those points was notably volatile. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Argentina compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Argentina’s CPL started at 10.54 in January, fell to its yearly low in February at 1.28, and then oscillated through the midyear before peaking at 86.33 in October. The annual average was 17.76, with a range from 1.28 to 86.33. Seven months landed under 10 (February, March, April, May, June, August, September), underscoring long stretches of low-cost lead generation. July marked a clear inflection at 33.33, followed by a reset in August (4.88) and September (3.08). The standout move arrived in October, surging to 86.33, remaining elevated in November at 45.12, and then easing back to 10.14 in December.

Month-to-month volatility was pronounced. The average absolute monthly move was 22.2 points, driven by large swings such as September to October (+83.3) and October to November (−41.2). Despite those swings, the year’s net change was minimal: December closed just 3.8% below January, illustrating how a flat finish can mask substantial intra-year turbulence.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Argentina’s CPL softened through Q2: Q1 averaged 6.63, and Q2 dipped further to 3.45, with April and May both near 1.7. Q3 rebounded, averaging 13.76—largely due to July’s jump—before the year’s most expensive period arrived in Q4. The final quarter averaged 47.20, nearly 3.5 times Q3, led by October’s peak and a still-elevated November. This cadence mirrors broad advertising rhythms—Q4 competition typically lifts costs—though Argentina’s Q4 lift was outsized relative to its earlier lows.

Country vs. Global

Relative to Facebook Ads benchmarks globally, Argentina remained below market in 11 of 12 months and averaged 57% cheaper for the year (17.8 versus 41.5). The gap was widest in February, when Argentina trailed by 97% (1.28 versus 40.14), and narrowed meaningfully in July (−19%) and November (−7%). October was the exception: Argentina’s CPL ran 77% above the global median (86.33 versus 48.83), the only month it exceeded the global level.

Global CPL climbed in a steady staircase from Q1 to Q4 (36.2 → 39.2 → 44.2 → 46.5), finishing the year at 42.24 and posting modest, measured shifts between months (average absolute move: 3.1 points). Argentina’s pattern was choppier, with a near-flat start-to-end level (−4%) but far larger month-to-month swings and a pronounced Q4 spike.

Closing

As a country-specific ad costs view, these Facebook Ads benchmarks show that cost per lead across all industries in Argentina was generally far below the global average, with a dramatic Q4 surge centered on October. Understanding CPL trends and industry ad performance in Argentina helps frame how local market dynamics compare with global patterns for the year.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Argentina, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Argentina Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 3‑4Carnival
Mar 24Truth & Justice Memorial
Apr 2Malvinas Day
Apr 18Good Friday
May 1Labour Day
May 25May Revolution Day
Jun 16Martín Miguel de Güemes Day
Jun 20Flag Day
Jul 9Independence Day
Aug 18San Martín Memorial Day
Oct 13Cultural Diversity Day
Nov 24National Sovereignty Day
Dec 8Immaculate Conception
Dec 25Christmas

Key Shopping Season

December (Christmas period)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM might rise significantly during Carnival, Independence Day, and Christmas season. Retail and entertainment campaigns could require increased budgets.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.