See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
January 2025 - January 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Argentina’s Cost per Lead (CPL) ran well below the global Facebook Ads benchmark for most of the year, then flipped dramatically in Q4 with a sharp October spike before easing into December. The pattern is marked by deep early-year troughs, a mid-year pop, and an exceptionally volatile finish — far choppier than the steadier global trend. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Argentina compared to the global benchmark.
Argentina opened at a CPL of 13.55 in December 2024 and closed at 19.55 in December 2025, a 44% lift across the period. The national median averaged 18.08, ranging from an ultra-low 1.28 in February to a high of 86.33 in October — an 85-point spread that underscores how turbulent the market became late in the year.
Month-to-month, the rhythm was uneven. After January (10.54), CPL plunged to February’s low (1.28), rebounded in March (8.08), and dipped again in April–May (around 1.71–1.72). June climbed to 6.67 before a July pop to 33.33. August–September fell back to 4.03 and 3.08, then October broke trend with the year’s peak (86.33). November cooled to 45.12, and December settled at 19.55 — still higher than the early-year floor but well below October’s spike.
Volatility was the defining feature. Argentina’s average absolute month-to-month move was about 19.8 points, roughly five times the global benchmark’s 3.9-point average swing. By contrast, the global CPL averaged 40.06 for the same period, ranging from 32.53 (December 2025) to 48.41 (October), a much tighter 16-point band. Globally, CPL declined 15% from December to December, while Argentina ended higher, highlighting divergent momentum.
Seasonally, Argentina displayed a soft Q1 and a deeper trough in Q2, with February–May marking the lowest-cost window. A single July lift broke the pattern before costs eased again in late Q3. Q4 flipped the script: October surged to the annual high, November stayed elevated, and December eased but remained above mid-year levels. The sequence reflects a year that started inexpensive for lead generation, compressed further through spring, and then pivoted to a costly and volatile Q4.
Globally, movement was more orderly: a gradual build into late Q3 and October highs, then a December pullback. The global curve showed less amplitude and fewer abrupt swings than Argentina, particularly around the Q4 peak.
Across the year, Argentina’s CPL sat well below market most months. January through June ran 70–97% below global levels, with the narrowest gap in July (Argentina 17% lower than global). The discount widened again in August–September (91–94% below). October was the outlier: Argentina jumped 78% above the global benchmark — the only clear month above market — before sliding to near parity in November (about 1% below global) and finishing December 40% below. At its tightest, the gap nearly closed in November; at its widest, Argentina trailed February’s global CPL by roughly 97%. The Argentine series was not only cheaper on average, but also markedly more volatile than the global benchmark.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per Lead in all industries in Argentina reveals a year of unusually low country-specific ad costs punctuated by a sharp Q4 surge. This CPL analysis helps situate Argentina’s industry ad performance against the steadier global baseline and clarifies how local volatility diverged from global CPL trends.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Argentina, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
December (Christmas period)
CPM might rise significantly during Carnival, Independence Day, and Christmas season. Retail and entertainment campaigns could require increased budgets.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app