Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Arts

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Arts

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Cost per Lead for the Arts industry ran structurally below the global benchmark in 2025, but with sharper mid-year swings and a pronounced Q4 spike. The year opened near $18, sank to a summer low near $8.57, then rebounded to a November peak above $25 before easing into December. By contrast, the global median Cost per Lead climbed steadily through the year, peaking in October. The result: Arts remained cheaper than the market almost every month, but operated with higher month-to-month volatility.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Arts across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Arts Cost per Lead averaged about $17.05 in 2025, ranging from a low of $8.57 in July to highs of $27.36 in April and $25.65 in November. The year started at $17.81 in January and ended at $14.68 in December, a 17.6% decline from start to finish.

The rhythm featured sharp inflections:

  • A lift from January to April (+54%), culminating in the April high.
  • A steep correction into May (−$17.05 month over month) and a deeper trough in July ($8.57).
  • A gradual recovery through early Q4, then a sudden November spike (+$10.94 month over month) before a December pullback (−$10.97).

Volatility in Arts was elevated: average absolute month-over-month movement was roughly $7.25, indicating larger swings than the level itself might suggest for Facebook Ads benchmarks focused on lead generation.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Arts CPL was softest in Q3 (averaging about $11.04), with Q1 near $20.04, Q2 at $18.78, and Q4 rebounding to $18.35 on the strength of November. The April high stands out as an early-season surge, followed by a mid-year low typical of softer summer engagement and budget rhythm. The later-year spike aligns with broader marketplace intensity, where country-specific ad costs often rise with holiday competition; however, in Arts, that spike concentrated in November and eased in December.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark (all industries, all countries), which averaged about $41.53 in 2025, Arts across all countries was consistently below market—roughly 59% cheaper on average. The gap ranged from 27% below in April (the narrowest spread) to 79% below in July (the widest). Monthly, Arts sat 40–70% below the market for most of the year.

Trend lines diverged: the global median CPL rose from $35.04 in January to $42.24 in December (+20.5%), while Arts fell from $17.81 to $14.68 (−17.6%). Volatility also differed: the global benchmark moved by about $3.13 on average month to month, less than half the Arts volatility, reflecting a steadier market backdrop versus choppier Arts dynamics.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads Cost per Lead benchmarks for the Arts industry across all countries point to structurally lower lead costs than the global average, but with more abrupt monthly moves—an early-year lift, a mid-year trough, and a concentrated November surge. Understanding Cost per Lead trends and broader Facebook Ads benchmarks for Arts across all countries provides a clear read on industry ad performance and how it compares to global patterns in country-specific ad costs, CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Arts industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.