Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in Brazil

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in Brazil

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

All industries in Brazil saw a cost-per-lead pattern that ran materially below the global Facebook Ads benchmark, but with far sharper swings. The year opened near parity, surged into a brief mid-year spike, then dropped to the lowest CPLs of the period before a modest late-year rebound. Compared to the steadier global curve, Brazil’s CPL was the more dramatic story: lower on average, punctuated by abrupt resets.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Brazil compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across November 2024 to October 2025, Brazil’s cost per lead averaged 23.9, versus a 40.8 global average—about 41% lower. The period began at 42.74 in November 2024 and ended at 12.14 in October 2025, a 72% decline from start to finish.

The high came in May 2025 at 64.22, the low in September at 7.82—an eightfold swing. Volatility was the headline: Brazil’s month-to-month absolute change averaged 18.1 points, nearly six times the global benchmark’s 3.1. Key pivots included a steep drop from November to December (−70%), a near-tripling from April to May (+192%), a sharp contraction into June (−64%), and another reset from July to August (−80%). After bottoming in September, CPL lifted 55% into October but remained well below the period’s opening level.

By contrast, the global series moved within a narrower band (33.27 to 47.62), peaking in September and easing slightly in October.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed up differently in Brazil versus the market. December was unusually soft for Brazil, with CPL falling to 12.92 after November’s near-benchmark level—counter to the typical Q4 tightening seen globally. Q1 stayed subdued (averaging 16.9), with modest gains in April. May broke the pattern with the year’s costliest month, followed by a stabilizing June and elevated July. The summer then turned into Brazil’s trough: August (8.75) and September (7.82) marked the lowest CPLs of the entire window, before a mild October rebound.

The global rhythm was more conventional: costs eased in March, then climbed steadily through Q3, peaking in September (47.62) with a mild October step-down.

Country vs. Global

Brazil tracked above market in only three of the twelve overlapping months (November, May, and July). It hovered near parity in July (+2% vs. global) and November (+3%), but trailed steeply through most of the year. The widest gap arrived in September, when Brazil’s CPL was 84% below the global benchmark. On a full-period basis, Brazil averaged 23.9 against a 40.8 global average (−41%). Trend direction also diverged: the global series rose about 9% from November to October, while Brazil fell 72%, reflecting more frequent, larger amplitude shifts.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for all industries in Brazil reveal lower country-specific ad costs than the global average, but with markedly higher volatility and pronounced mid-year and late-Q3 inflection points. Understanding CPL performance in Brazil alongside global Facebook Ads benchmarks—across CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance context—helps frame industry ad performance and seasonal dynamics for the market.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Brazil, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Brazil Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 3–4Carnival
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Tiradentes Day
May 1Labour Day
Jun 19Corpus Christi
Sep 7Independence Day
Oct 12Our Lady of Aparecida (Children's Day)
Nov 2All Souls' Day
Nov 15Republic Proclamation Day
Nov 20Black Awareness Day
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

December (Christmas), Late November (Black Friday), Children's Day (Oct 12)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise around Carnival and Independence Day due to increased social activity. Children's Day (Oct 12) and Black Friday could see sharp spikes in competition. December (Christmas) may surge e‑commerce traffic, prompting high CPMs. Extended holiday weekends could shift ad engagement patterns.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.