Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in Brazil

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in Brazil

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

All-industries cost per lead in Brazil spent 2025 well below the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, but with far sharper swings. The year opened in the low 20s, surged to a May peak, then fell into a deep Q4 trough before a modest December rebound. Two months (May and July) briefly ran above market; most months sat far under the global level. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Brazil compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Brazil’s CPL began at 22.71 in January and closed the year at 12.65, a 44% decline end-to-end. The average across 2025 was 21.0, with a wide range from a 64.22 high in May to a 3.30 low in November. Month-to-month movement was pronounced: after a quiet February–March floor around 14, costs lifted in April and spiked in May (+192% month over month). That spike reset immediately in June (−64%), rebounded in July (+118%), and then slid hard through August and November before a December bounce (+283% from November, though still below the January start).

Volatility was the defining feature. The average absolute monthly swing in Brazil was roughly 17.1 points, about 5.5 times the global benchmark’s 3.1. In practical terms, Brazil’s CPL oscillated from short-lived surges to deep troughs, whereas the global curve crept upward in steadier steps.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The year’s rhythm broke into four distinct phases:

  • Q1: Softer, with a gradual ease from 22.71 to the mid-teens (quarter average ~16.9).
  • Q2: Elevated by a singular May spike; the quarter averaged ~36.4 despite June’s reset.
  • Q3: A split pattern—July elevated (50.06), then a sharp slide into August and September (quarter average ~22.2).
  • Q4: The low point of the year, led by November’s 3.30 trough; Q4 averaged just ~8.6, with a late December rebound to 12.65.

This cadence diverged from typical Q4 competition effects often seen in CPC trends and CPM analysis. While global CPLs tightened higher into Q4, Brazil’s lead costs sank, bottoming in November before a year-end lift.

Country vs. Global

Against the global benchmark, Brazil’s CPL averaged 21.0 versus 41.5 globally—about 49% lower on the year. Brazil trailed global levels in 10 of 12 months. The exceptions were:

  • May: 64% above the global median (Brazil 64.22 vs. global 39.06).
  • July: 22% above the global median (50.06 vs. 40.90).

At its narrowest deficit, Brazil was 35% below the global level in January; at its widest, November sat 93% below market. Trend-wise, the global baseline climbed roughly 21% from January to December and peaked in Q4 (highest in October), whereas Brazil declined from January to December and posted its lowest levels in Q4. Brazil’s range (about 61 points) far exceeded the global range (~15 points), underscoring its more volatile, stop-start pattern.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for all industries in Brazil highlights a market with structurally lower CPLs than the global average but with markedly higher volatility. These country-specific ad costs provide context for industry ad performance, clarifying how Brazil’s CPL trends diverged from the global pattern throughout 2025.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Brazil, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Brazil Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Mar 3–4Carnival
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 21Tiradentes Day
May 1Labour Day
Jun 19Corpus Christi
Sep 7Independence Day
Oct 12Our Lady of Aparecida (Children's Day)
Nov 2All Souls' Day
Nov 15Republic Proclamation Day
Nov 20Black Awareness Day
Dec 25Christmas Day

Key Shopping Season

December (Christmas), Late November (Black Friday), Children's Day (Oct 12)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise around Carnival and Independence Day due to increased social activity. Children's Day (Oct 12) and Black Friday could see sharp spikes in competition. December (Christmas) may surge e‑commerce traffic, prompting high CPMs. Extended holiday weekends could shift ad engagement patterns.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.