Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Construction

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Construction

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Construction’s cost-per-lead (CPL) runs hotter than the market overall, but with a choppier rhythm. Across all countries, Construction CPL started 2025 elevated, slid into a late-summer trough, then rebounded sharply into January 2026. Compared to the global benchmark (all industries), it spent most months above-market, briefly dipped below in late Q3–Q4, and finished the period still pricier than average. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for the Construction industry across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Levels and range: Construction CPL averaged $49.49 across the 13-month window, higher than the $40.99 global average. The category ranged from a high of $59.51 in March 2025 to a low of $37.95 in August, a $21.56 spread. The market’s range was narrower ($33.43 in March to $48.83 in October; $15.41).
  • Start and finish: Construction opened January 2025 at $57.06 and ended January 2026 at $53.65 (−6% vs. the start). The global benchmark moved from $35.04 to $34.46 (−2%).
  • Month-to-month momentum: The category saw pronounced swings—down 11% in February, up 18% in March, and a steady softening through July (−13%) and August (−17%). A sharp September rebound (+27%) was followed by a softer Q4, then a steep January 2026 surge (+32% month over month).
  • Volatility: Average absolute monthly change was $6.45 for Construction versus $3.52 for the global benchmark—about 83% more volatile.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The first half of 2025 was the costlier half for Construction leads. H1 averaged $53.47 (January–June), while H2 averaged $44.81 (July–December), a −16% shift. Costs eased through midsummer, bottomed in August, and partially recovered into early fall. By contrast, the broader market climbed into Q3–Q4: the global benchmark’s H1 averaged $37.71 and H2 rose to $45.35 (+20%). Q4 illustrated the divergence: Construction’s October–December averaged $45.72, slightly below the market’s $46.49. The pronounced January 2026 lift in Construction countered December softness and restored a premium over the global baseline.

Country vs. Global

Across all countries, Construction CPL sat about 21% above the global benchmark on average (13-month view). It outpaced the market in 9 of 13 months, with the widest gap in March 2025 (+78% vs. global). The narrowest gap came in September, when Construction essentially matched the market (within 0.2%). There were periods of under-market costs—August (−12% vs. global), November (−3%), and December (−4%)—clustered around late Q3 and Q4. While the global trend climbed steadily into autumn (+16% from March lows to October highs), Construction’s path was choppier (−7% across 2025 with a late-summer dip and a January rebound). In short, Construction remained above market overall, but with bigger month-to-month swings and brief intervals of parity or discount late in the year.

Closing

These Facebook Ads benchmarks highlight CPL dynamics for the Construction industry across all countries: higher-than-market costs, stronger volatility, and a late-year dip that briefly aligned with global levels before a sharp January rebound. Understanding cost-per-lead benchmarks—alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps frame industry ad performance and country-specific ad costs against global patterns for Construction.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Construction industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.