Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Construction

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Construction

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Construction’s cost-per-lead ran materially above the global benchmark for most of the year, then pivoted lower into October. Across all countries, Construction CPL opened high in November 2024, swung through several sharp moves, and ultimately landed at its annual low in October 2025—opposite the broader market’s late-year firmness. Volatility was the tell: bigger month-to-month swings than the global median and a standout March spike before a late-year drop closed the gap and briefly flipped the relationship.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Construction across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to finish: Construction CPL moved from $57.70 in November 2024 to $42.91 in October 2025, a 26% decline. Over the same period, the global benchmark rose from $41.47 to $45.08 (+9%).
  • Range and average: Construction averaged $50.8, ranging from a high of $57.72 in March to a low of $42.91 in October. The global benchmark averaged $40.9, with a low of $33.35 in March and a high of $48.29 in September.
  • Volatility: Average month-to-month absolute movement in Construction CPL was roughly $5.9, markedly more volatile than the global benchmark’s $3.2. Notable swings included a +$9.20 jump in March and a −$10.90 slide into October.
  • Key moves: After a softening into February ($48.52), Construction spiked to $57.72 in March, fell back in April–May, rebounded in June and September, then broke lower to the year’s trough in October.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Typical platform seasonality shows softer efficiency in Q4 as competition intensifies, with leaner CPLs early in the year. The global benchmark reflected that: it bottomed in March, firmed through summer, and held elevated levels into September–October. Construction diverged. Instead of a March trough, the industry posted its annual high in March, then oscillated through Q2 and Q3 before a sharper-than-usual October pullback. The rhythm was choppy: brief rebounds (June, September) punctuated by larger drawdowns (April, July, October).

Construction vs. Global

  • Level comparison: Construction CPL averaged about $9.9 above market, or +24% versus the global benchmark across the period.
  • Gap dynamics: The premium was widest in March, when Construction’s $57.72 sat 73% above the $33.35 global level. It narrowed materially by August (+2% over market) and inverted in October, coming in 5% below the $45.08 benchmark—the only month below market.
  • Momentum: While the global trend climbed steadily (+9%), Construction’s path was more volatile and ultimately down (−26%), moving from consistent “above market” territory to parity and a brief “below market” close.

Closing

Facebook Ads benchmarks show cost-per-lead for the Construction industry across all countries averaged $50.8, with a March high and an October low, and a year marked by larger swings than the global market. These CPL trends, read alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance, highlight how industry ad performance for Construction globally can diverge from broader, all-industry patterns. Understanding cost-per-lead benchmarks for Construction across all countries helps advertisers contextualize global ad costs against the overall market baseline.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Construction industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.