See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
February 2025 - February 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Consulting advertisers across all countries spent markedly less per lead than the overall market in 2025. Cost per Lead (CPL) in Consulting averaged $26.26 for the year, versus a $41.53 global all‑industry benchmark — roughly 37% lower. The year opened steady, lifted into midsummer, and then broke sharply lower in Q4, ending with an unusually low December. Volatility was noticeable: a July spike gave way to a rapid slide by year‑end, creating one of the widest gaps versus the global baseline all year.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consulting across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Consulting CPL started at $25.32 in January and finished at $9.46 in December, a 63% decline across the year. The annual high came in July at $36.29, while the low arrived in December at $9.46 — a peak‑to‑trough spread of $26.83, equal to about 102% of the annual average. Month‑to‑month movement averaged $3.66, reflecting a choppier pattern than the global benchmark.
The cadence was measured early: January–February held flat around $25.3–$25.3, followed by modest lifts into March ($27.99) and June ($28.62). July marked the turning point with a surge to $36.29, then costs cooled in August–September around $30–$31. The break lower accelerated in Q4: October eased to $28.14, November dropped to $18.72 (−33% vs. October), and December fell again to $9.46 (−49% vs. November).
H1 was stable to slightly higher, averaging $26.95, with a midsummer crest in July. H2 averaged $25.58 overall but masked a sharp pivot: a short‑lived summer premium gave way to a decisive Q4 decline. This diverged from the broader market’s typical Q4 pattern where higher auction pressure often lifts CPL, CPM analysis, and CPC trends. In Consulting across all countries, CPL trended down into the holidays, suggesting stronger conversion efficiency or softer auction intensity even as impressions and CTR performance dynamics typically shift late in the year.
Relative to the global all‑industry benchmark, Consulting CPL stayed below market every month in 2025. The average gap was 37% lower, with the narrowest spread in July (about 11% below the global CPL of $40.90) and the widest in December (about 78% below $42.24). Through H1, the global benchmark averaged $37.71; it climbed to $45.35 in H2 (+20%), peaking in October at $48.83. By contrast, Consulting hit its local high in July and then fell sharply, creating a widening discount in Q4 even as global Facebook Ads benchmarks remained elevated. Month‑to‑month volatility was also higher in Consulting (3.66 vs. 3.13 points for the global series), underscoring a more abrupt second‑half reversal.
In sum, Facebook Ads cost‑per‑lead benchmarks for the Consulting industry across all countries show a year defined by a midsummer peak and a pronounced Q4 decline, averaging $26.26 against a $41.53 global baseline. This CPL trend — consistently below global levels and more volatile — provides a clear view of industry ad performance and country‑agnostic ad costs relative to broader market patterns. Understanding cost‑per‑lead benchmarks for Consulting across all countries helps marketers contextualize CPL alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance versus the global benchmark.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consulting industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app