Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Consumer Goods

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Consumer Goods

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Consumer Goods lead generation ran consistently more expensive than the market, with a sharp Q4 plot twist. Across all countries, median Facebook Ads cost per lead (CPL) for Consumer Goods averaged about $50 over the past 13 months, versus roughly $40 for the global, all‑industry benchmark—about 26% higher on average. The category moved through a mid‑year lift, an October spike, and an abrupt November drop before a partial December rebound. Volatility was notably higher than the market, with larger month‑to‑month swings and a wider range between highs and lows.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consumer Goods in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Starting in December 2024 at $57.29, Consumer Goods CPL eased to $41.21 by December 2025—down 28% year over year. The period’s high landed in October 2025 at $62.59, with the low immediately after in November at $34.12. The full‑period average was approximately $50.3, with six months clearing $50 (January, February, July, August, September, October).

Momentum shifted several times:

  • Early compression: January’s $58.48 cooled to $43.02 by March (−26% from Jan to Mar).
  • Spring stability: April–June hovered in the low‑to‑high $40s ($42.55 to $49.86).
  • Summer lift: July–September climbed back into the low‑to‑mid $50s, peaking at $56.52 in August and $53.29 in September.
  • Q4 whiplash: October surged to the annual high ($62.59), followed by a 45% plunge to $34.12 in November, then a 21% rebound to $41.21 in December.

Volatility was pronounced. Average absolute month‑to‑month movement was about $6.60 for Consumer Goods, almost two‑thirds higher than the global market’s $3.91, signaling sharper swings than the benchmark.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The mid‑year stretch was steadier and stronger: Q3 2025 averaged about $54.3, the best quarter for Consumer Goods CPL, compared with $47.1 in Q2. Q4 was the most uneven—October’s spike was immediately followed by the year’s steepest drop in November, then a partial recovery in December. By comparison, the global all‑industry benchmark showed a gentler climb into September–October and a typical late‑year softening, with December marking its lowest CPL.

Country vs. Global

Consumer Goods across all countries stayed above market most of the year. Relative to the global benchmark, the category ran:

  • +68% higher in January (Consumer Goods $58.48 vs. global $34.89).
  • +30% to +33% higher through much of Q1–Q3.
  • Narrowest gap in September at +11% ($53.29 vs. $48.13).
  • Only month below market in November, at 25% under the benchmark ($34.12 vs. $45.77).
  • Back to +27% above in December ($41.21 vs. $32.53).

Overall, Consumer Goods CPL averaged about 26% above global levels, with a larger high‑low range ($62.59 to $34.12) than the market ($48.41 to $32.53).

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in the Consumer Goods industry across all countries show a pricier and more volatile year than the global average—defined by a strong Q3, an October peak, and a sharp November dislocation before stabilizing into December. Understanding cost‑per‑lead trends for Consumer Goods in all countries helps marketers gauge country‑aggregated ad costs and compare performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consumer Goods industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.