See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Global Consumer Goods leads were consistently more expensive than the all‑industry benchmark for most of the year, climbing into a high-cost plateau through Q4 2024 and again in late Q3–Q4 2025 before a sudden November reset. The pattern reads as a classic seasonal rise with an unexpected cliff: elevated Cost Per Lead (CPL) from December through October, then a sharp drop in November 2025 that broke from the global trajectory and from Consumer Goods’ own trend. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consumer Goods across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Consumer Goods CPL started at $44.71 in November 2024 and ended markedly lower at $18.82 in November 2025. Across the 13-month window, CPL averaged $48.7 for Consumer Goods, versus a $39.8 global all‑industry average. The category’s high came in October 2025 at $59.26, with an earlier peak band in December 2024–January 2025 ($57.29–$57.50). The lowest point was November 2025 at $18.82; prior to that trough, the softest month was March 2025 at $42.26.
Month-to-month volatility averaged $7.8, notably above the global benchmark’s $4.2. Excluding the November 2025 cliff, Consumer Goods’ average monthly swing settles to $4.8—much closer to market rhythm. Key inflections included a steep rise into December 2024 (+$12.6 MoM), a retrenchment into February–March (−$15.2 across two months), a steady rebuild through August (+$3–$5 monthly), a pre‑holiday surge into October (+$7.27), and then the November drop (−$40.44).
Seasonality is visible in two arcs. First, a year-end run-up where CPL lifted from November 2024 into a December–January high band. Second, a late‑summer to early‑Q4 push: July–October 2025 averaged $55.5, the priciest stretch of the year. Spring was comparatively softer; March–April hovered around $42–$43 before rebuilding across May–August. The outlier is November 2025: instead of continuing typical Q4 pressure, CPL reset to the series low, diverging sharply from the preceding October surge.
For context, the global series shows a gentler slope: a gradual climb from Q2 into a September 2025 high ($47.62), a modest October easing, and then a November dip—noticeable but not as extreme as the Consumer Goods swing.
Consumer Goods CPL sat above the global benchmark in 12 of 13 months. The gap was widest in January 2025 (+61% vs. market) and December 2024 (+45%), remaining elevated through mid‑year (+15% to +27%). The spread narrowed in September 2025 (+9%), the closest the category came to global levels before spiking again in October (+32%). Only November 2025 undercut the global median, with Consumer Goods 34% below the market. Overall, the Consumer Goods average ($48.7) was about 22% higher than the global all‑industry average ($39.8), and it was more volatile—especially when November’s reset is included.
These Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Lead highlight how Consumer Goods across all countries typically carries above‑market lead costs, with strong seasonal lift in late summer and early Q4 and an unusual November 2025 reset. Understanding cost‑per‑lead trends in Consumer Goods at a global level helps teams gauge category dynamics against the broader market and interpret country‑specific ad costs within a global frame.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consumer Goods industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app