Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Consumer Goods

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Consumer Goods

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Consumer Goods lead costs ran consistently above market over the past year, with clear Q4 uplift, a pronounced Q1–Q2 cooldown, and a late-summer push that set the stage for a new high in October. Median cost per lead (CPL) for Consumer Goods across all countries averaged $51.05, notably higher than the global all-industry benchmark at $40.94. The year opened with elevated prices in December and January, fell sharply into March, then rebuilt through summer before peaking in October—showing a more volatile rhythm than the broader market.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Consumer Goods across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point (Nov ’24): $44.60
  • Ending point (Oct ’25): $59.27 — up roughly 33% from November
  • Average: $51.05
  • High: $59.27 in October
  • Low: $41.99 in March

The arc is pronounced. After a jump into December ($57.29) and January ($57.49), CPL retreated to the annual low in March ($41.99), a drop of 27% from January. From that trough, costs rebuilt: April ($42.79) to August ($55.75) marked a 30% climb, followed by a brief September easing ($52.05) and then a decisive October peak ($59.27). Volatility averaged a month-to-month move of $4.83, sharper than the global benchmark’s $3.22, with the biggest swings appearing in early Q1 (−$10.14 in February→March and +$12.69 in November→December).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The pattern mirrors classic seasonal pressure. Q4 showed heightened competition, with December running among the priciest months and October ultimately taking the top spot. Engagement economics softened through late Q1, culminating in March’s low point. Spring steadied the market, and summer demand pushed CPLs back up: June through August formed the strongest sustained stretch before a minor September cooldown. Performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1—this period followed that rhythm but with a steeper mid-year rebuild.

Country vs. Global

Consumer Goods CPLs across all countries outpaced the global all-industry baseline in every month. On average, the category cleared the market by about 25%. The gap was narrowest in November (+8% vs. global) and September (+8%), and widest in January (+61%). While the global benchmark rose a modest 9% from November to October (from $41.47 to $45.08), Consumer Goods climbed a steeper 33% over the same span. The baseline moved within a tighter range ($33.35–$48.29), highlighting steadier CPM analysis and CPC trends at the market level, whereas Consumer Goods exhibited higher CPL volatility and more pronounced seasonal surges. Throughout, category CPL remained structurally above market, especially in the high-demand windows that also pressure CTR performance and country-specific ad costs.

Closing

Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in Consumer Goods across all countries show a consistently above-market profile, marked by Q4 inflation, a March trough, and a strong late-summer rebound into an October peak. Understanding CPL trends for Consumer Goods across all countries helps teams gauge industry ad performance against the global benchmark and track how seasonal intensity shapes country-aggregated ad costs over the year.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Consumer Goods industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.