Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Crypto & Blockchain

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Crypto & Blockchain

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Crypto & Blockchain lead costs came in dramatically above market but cooled quickly across the latest three-month window. In November 2024, cost per lead (CPL) spiked to about $1,027—over twenty-four times the global benchmark—before falling to $358 in December and $263 in January. The arc reads like a fast deflation from an extreme high, with the gap to the global average narrowing month by month. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Crypto & Blockchain across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across all countries, Crypto & Blockchain CPL averaged roughly $549 from November to January, ranging from a high of $1,027 in November to a low of $263 in January. The step-down was steep: −65% from November to December and another −27% into January, a cumulative −74% decline over the period. November stood 87% above the three‑month average; January landed 52% below it.

Against this, the global benchmark was far steadier and far lower: averaging about $39 across the same months, easing from $42 in November to $40 in December and $36 in January. Monthly swings averaged $382 (46%) for Crypto & Blockchain versus roughly $3 (7%) for the global baseline—clear evidence of a more volatile category profile.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The data shows a sharp late-Q4 peak for Crypto & Blockchain followed by rapid normalization into early Q1. While many categories experience tighter auction dynamics in Q4, the November Crypto level was an outlier by magnitude. December marked a meaningful reset, and January continued that cooling trend.

Looking beyond the three-month Crypto window, the 2025 global benchmark provides seasonal context: it drifts lower into March (near $33), climbs through mid-year to a late Q3 high around $48 in September, then softens into October before dropping to about $29 by November. Crypto’s short run deviated from this smoother, seasonal rhythm with a dramatic surge-and-slide.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, Crypto & Blockchain CPL was:

  • November: ~24.7x above market ($1,027 vs. $41.5).
  • December: ~9.0x above market ($358 vs. $39.6).
  • January: ~7.4x above market ($263 vs. $35.7).

On average over the three months, Crypto was about 14x the global level. The gap narrowed materially as Q4 gave way to Q1, yet the category remained firmly above benchmark throughout. The global trend slipped gently (−14% from November to January), while Crypto’s path was choppier and far steeper (−74%).

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads cost‑per‑lead benchmarks for Crypto & Blockchain across all countries show an exceptional November spike and a swift reversion by January, staying well above the global baseline at every point. Understanding CPL trends and category‑level volatility helps frame Crypto & Blockchain industry ad performance against broader, global Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Crypto & Blockchain industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.