Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Crypto & Blockchain

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Crypto & Blockchain

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Crypto & Blockchain lead generation is running far hotter than the broader market. In January 2025, Facebook Ads cost per lead (CPL) for Crypto & Blockchain across all countries landed at roughly $263 — about 7.5x above the global, all‑industry median of $35 that month. While the global benchmark followed a familiar seasonal lift through Q3 and Q4 in 2025, this category’s single observed data point sits well outside the market envelope, signaling materially higher acquisition costs for this audience.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Crypto & Blockchain in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point: Crypto & Blockchain CPL opened 2025 at $262.87 worldwide.
  • Against the global benchmark, January’s Crypto CPL was about +650% higher than the market median. Even compared to the 2025 global average of $41.53, Crypto sat roughly 6.3x higher.
  • The global benchmark in 2025 ranged from a yearly low of $33.43 in March to a peak of $48.83 in October, averaging $41.53. That’s a $15 swing across the year (about 37% of the average).
  • Month-to-month movement in the global series averaged $3.13, with the sharpest drop from February to March (−$6.72) and the largest rise from January to February (+$5.11). By December, costs eased to $42.24 before returning to $34.46 in January 2026.

With only one month of Crypto & Blockchain data, intra-year volatility can’t be profiled for the category. But the January level alone exceeded the global peak by about $214, underscoring a lead-cost environment that sits far above broader Facebook Ads benchmarks.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The global CPL trend in 2025 followed a recognizable rhythm:

  • Early year softness: costs dipped into a trough by March ($33), a typical Q1 pattern following Q4 competition.
  • Gradual climb: CPLs lifted through spring and summer, rising from April ($37) to September ($48).
  • Q4 intensity: the market peaked in October ($49) and stayed elevated into November before easing in December ($42).

Against this seasonal backdrop, the Crypto & Blockchain snapshot from January 2025 stands out as structurally higher than any month in the global series. If viewed against typical cycles, the category’s reading arrived during a period when the broader market was near its yearly floor.

Country vs. Global

  • Relative level: Crypto & Blockchain across all countries was about 7.5x above the global, all‑industry median in January 2025.
  • Market envelope: The global series moved within a $33–$49 band throughout 2025. The Crypto & Blockchain January value sat well beyond this range, outpacing the global peak by roughly 5.4x.
  • Momentum comparison: The global benchmark rose about 46% from its March low to its October high, then cooled into December. The single-month Crypto reading does not show a trend line, but its premium over market was pronounced even at the global benchmark’s strongest points.

Closing

For marketers tracking Facebook Ads benchmarks, this snapshot indicates that cost per lead for Crypto & Blockchain across all countries materially exceeds global, all‑industry CPL levels. Understanding cost-per-lead trends for Crypto & Blockchain in a worldwide context helps teams gauge category intensity, compare country-specific ad costs to market norms, and interpret industry ad performance against broader Facebook Ads CPL patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Crypto & Blockchain industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.