See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Against a steady global benchmark, the Design industry’s cost per lead (CPL) moved in dramatic waves. From a moderate start in November (93.3), Design CPL surged through winter and early spring, peaking at 528.5 in April before easing into summer, briefly rebounding in September (282.7), and then collapsing to just 5.13 in October. By contrast, the global all‑industry median CPL was remarkably stable, ranging from 33.35 to 48.29 across the same period. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Design across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Design opened at 93.3 in November and closed at 5.13 in October, a headline decline of 94% driven by an unusually low October. Between those bookends, the category climbed steeply: 213.2 in December, 423.1 in January, and 459.5 in March before reaching its high in April (528.5). The summer trough settled near 158 across July (176.6) and August (139.5), followed by a September lift (282.7) and the October break.
Across the 12 months, Design’s average CPL was 279.5; excluding October’s outlier, the average rises to 304.5. The high‑to‑low spread is wide (528.5 to 5.13). Month‑to‑month volatility averaged 133 points, reflecting large swings like +209.9 from December to January and −210.8 from April to May. The global benchmark, by comparison, averaged 41.0 with month‑to‑month movements of just 3.2 points.
The pattern shows a classic build into late Q1 and early Q2: November through April advanced +466% from 93.3 to 528.5. Mid‑year softened: May (317.7) and June (358.0) cooled from April’s high, with a deeper lull in July and August. September reversed that lull with a +103% jump from August, before October’s abrupt low.
Globally, CPL followed a gentler rhythm. Medians hovered near the mid‑30s in Q1 (January–March average: 36.5), crept into the low 40s by early summer, and reached a mild high in September (48.3) before easing slightly in October (45.1). This cadence aligns with typical competition patterns in digital auctions: softer early‑year costs, a gradual tightening into late summer and early fall.
Design’s CPL sat materially above market for most of the year—between 3x and 14x the global median in every month except October. The narrowest positive gap was November (+125% vs. global), while March and April marked the widest (about +1,275% to +1,278% above the benchmark). The gap compressed into summer—Q1 averaged 413 for Design versus 36.5 globally (≈11x), while Q3 averaged 200 for Design versus 45.2 globally (≈4.4x). October was the outlier in the opposite direction, with Design’s CPL 89% below the global median. Overall, the global trend rose steadily (+9% from November to October), while Design’s path was far more volatile.
Understanding Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in the Design industry across all countries highlights a year defined by a sharp first‑half run‑up, a mid‑year cooldown, and a rare October break—consistently priced far above the global all‑industry CPL except in the final month. While this report centers on CPL, marketers often view these signals alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance to contextualize country‑specific ad costs and industry ad performance against global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Design industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app