See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
The Design industry’s Cost Per Lead (CPL) ran hot across all countries, far above the global all‑industry benchmark for most of the year, with a dramatic surge through early spring, a mid‑year cool‑down, and a one‑month October trough that reset the range before a modest November rebound. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Design across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Design CPL opened at 93 in November 2024 and ended at 147 in November 2025, a 58% lift over the period. The median peaked at 528 in April 2025 and hit a brief low of 5 in October 2025. Excluding that October dip, the early‑year run-up is the defining move: 213 in December, 423 in January, 357 in February, 460 in March, and a crest at 528 in April. Costs then eased to 318 in May and 358 in June, fell to 177 in July and 140 in August, and re‑accelerated to 283 in September before the October break and November partial recovery to 147.
Across the 13 months, Design CPL averaged 269, versus 39.8 for the global all‑industry baseline. Month-to-month volatility was pronounced: absolute changes averaged 133 points in Design, versus just 4.23 globally, underscoring a market that moved in large steps rather than small increments. Notable monthly swings included a +210 jump from February to March, a −211 pullback from April to May, and a −278 slide into October, followed by a +142 rebound in November.
The seasonal rhythm was led by a powerful Q1–April climb: Design CPL averaged 413 across January–March, then peaked in April. Mid‑year, costs softened meaningfully, with July–August averaging 200 and marking the lowest steady stretch of the year. September renewed some momentum at 283. October stands out as an outlier dip, the only month materially below the broader market, before November returned to a more typical range for the category.
In the global baseline, the pattern was steadier: a gradual rise from 35.7 in January to 47.6 by September, then softer levels into November at 28.6—consistent with late‑year shifts in auction dynamics. The baseline’s highs and lows (48 in September; 28.6 in November) were narrow compared to Design’s wide arc.
Design’s CPL sat above the global benchmark in every month except October—often dramatically so. The gap ranged from roughly 2–3x in November 2024 and August 2025, to 7–9x through late Q1 and early summer, and peaked near 14x in April (528 vs. 37.9). Q1 alone averaged 11x above global. In contrast, October’s trough put Design 89% below the global level that month (5 vs. 45.1), before the spread normalized to about 5x in November (147 vs. 28.6). While the global series declined 31% from start to finish, Design ended higher than it began, but with far choppier month-to-month motion.
Taken together, these Facebook Ads benchmarks show that Cost Per Lead for the Design industry across all countries is structurally higher and more volatile than the global average, with a clear Q1–April surge, mid‑year easing, and an October anomaly. Understanding CPL dynamics—alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps situate industry ad performance and country‑specific ad costs against global patterns for Design.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Design industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app