See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
E-commerce cost per lead (CPL) ran hot to start the period, then cooled dramatically—swinging from a persistent premium over the global, all-industry benchmark to a clear discount by mid-year. Across all countries, E-commerce CPL averaged $49 over the last 13 months, notably higher than the $39.83 global baseline. The peak arrived in February 2025 at $68.93 before a sharp reset in July and a continued slide into November 2025, which closed at $21.80—about two-thirds below the prior November.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for E-commerce in all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The period opens in November 2024 at $61.54 and ends in November 2025 at $21.80—a 65% decline. The series reached its high in February 2025 ($68.93) and its low in November 2025 ($21.80), with an overall average of $49.32. The first eight months (Nov 2024–Jun 2025) averaged a costly $59.18, while the final five months (Jul–Nov 2025) averaged $33.56, a 43% step-down.
Volatility was pronounced. E-commerce CPL moved an average of $8.31 month-to-month—about double the global benchmark’s $4.23. The most abrupt shifts were a drop from June to July (−$18.82), a late-year pullback into November (−$13.80), and an early spike into February (+$17.57). The global line, by contrast, climbed steadily into September ($47.62) before its own sharp November correction to $28.58.
The rhythm is clear: elevated CPLs through Q4 2024 and early Q1 2025, with momentum stretching into April ($65.90). Costs eased in May–June (low $50s) before a decisive mid-year reset in July ($31.98). A modest rebound followed in August–September ($37.50–$40.90), then a softer October ($35.60), and a marked trough in November ($21.80). This arc aligns with a year that front-loaded acquisition costs and back-loaded efficiency, reversing the early-year pattern.
The global benchmark showed a different cadence—gradual firming from March through September, then a single, outsized downtick in November—suggesting broader market costs were steadier until late-year.
E-commerce CPL across all countries sat well above market in the early stretch: +52% in December 2024, +71% in February 2025, and a cycle-high +88% in March. The premium narrowed in late spring (+24% in June) and flipped to a discount from July onward: −24% in July, −15% in August, −14% in September, and −24% again by November. On average, E-commerce CPLs were 24% higher than the global benchmark across the full period, but the second half ran decisively below it.
Where the global trend climbed into September (+14% from November 2024 to September 2025), E-commerce was choppier and ultimately lower, finishing November 2025 down 65% year over year versus the global decline of 31%.
These Facebook Ads benchmarks spotlight cost-per-lead dynamics for E-commerce across all countries: a first-half premium over the market, a mid-year reset, and a second-half discount relative to the global line. Understanding CPL trends within industry ad performance—alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps contextualize country-specific ad costs even when aggregated globally for E-commerce across all countries.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the E-commerce industry, Facebook ad costs can be varied, with peaks during holiday seasons and competitive product categories. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app