Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for E-commerce

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for E-commerce

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

E-commerce lead costs spent the year on a two-act arc: elevated and choppy through the first half, then resetting lower and sitting below market for much of the back half. Compared to the global benchmark, E-commerce across all countries began well above average, spiked in late winter, and then unwound into a softer, more affordable Q3–Q4—closing the year at its low. Volatility was a defining feature, with sharper swings than the global baseline and standout peaks in February and March.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for E-commerce across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

CPL for E-commerce opened at about $60 in December 2024 and finished December 2025 near $30—roughly a 51% decline year over year. Across the 13-month window, E-commerce CPL averaged $48, versus a $40 global median. The high water mark arrived in February at $68, followed by another elevated month in March ($62) and April ($64). The low came in December at $30, with a secondary trough in July at $32.

Month by month, the path was jagged. January eased from December (−$8), February jumped sharply (+$16), and spring remained expensive in the low-to-mid $60s. Costs cooled into June ($50), then broke lower in July (−50% from April’s level). Late summer stabilized in the upper $30s to low $40s—August $38, September $41—before a softer October ($38), a brief lift in November ($45), and the reset to the annual low in December.

Volatility underscored the year: the average absolute month-to-month move was about $8.1, more than double the global benchmark’s $3.9. The E-commerce range spanned nearly $38 between its high and low—roughly 79% of its average level—highlighting a market that moved faster and further than the baseline.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed clearly. Q1 was the costliest stretch for E-commerce, averaging roughly $61 as competition and demand lifted lead prices. Q2 moderated, sliding from the mid-$60s into the low $50s. Q3 settled into a new regime—high $30s to low $40s—before a mixed Q4: a softer October, a November rebound, and a year-low December. The global benchmark echoed this rhythm at a gentler pace, climbing into September–October and then easing materially in December.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, E-commerce CPL averaged about 21% higher across the period. The first half consistently sat above market—January through June ranged roughly 23% to 88% higher, with the widest gap in March (+88%). From July onward, the relationship flipped: July (−21% vs. global), August (−11%), September (−16%), and October (−23%). The gap narrowed to its tightest point in November (about 3% below global) and ended December about 9% under the benchmark. Notably, while the global index rose about 13% from August to October, E-commerce was roughly flat to down (~4%), signaling a divergent H2 trajectory and higher sensitivity to monthly forces.

Closing

These Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost per Lead show E-commerce across all countries shifting from an above-market, high-volatility first half to a below-benchmark, more affordable second half. Understanding CPL trends for E-commerce across all countries helps teams evaluate country-specific ad costs and compare industry ad performance against the global benchmark.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the E-commerce industry, Facebook ad costs can be varied, with peaks during holiday seasons and competitive product categories. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.