Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Education

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Education

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Education’s Facebook Ads cost-per-lead (CPL) ran materially below the global all‑industry benchmark in 2025, yet moved with a similar seasonal rhythm: softer in Q1, building through summer, peaking in early Q4, and easing into November. The standout moments were a sharp May lift, an October high, and an unusually steep drop in January 2026 that broke the prior trend line. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Education across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Education CPL started 2025 at $15.00 and ended December at $21.57, a 44% rise across the year. The monthly median averaged $19.27, ranging from a low of $13.83 in March to a high of $23.87 in October—a spread of about $10. The most pronounced month-to-month moves were a May surge (+$7.34 vs. April, +48%) and a November pullback (−$4.39 vs. October, −18%). Typical month-to-month volatility averaged $3.07, or about 16% of the yearly average, indicating noticeable but not erratic swings.

By quarter, Education CPL averaged roughly $15.5 in Q1, $18.4 in Q2, and about $21.6 in both Q3 and Q4—steady gains from early-year softness to peak acquisition costs in the fall. January 2026 marked an abrupt break: CPL fell to $0.81, a 96% decline from December and far outside the prior 12‑month range.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The 2025 rhythm was clear. Q1 was the trough (March at $13.83), followed by a spring acceleration capped by May’s jump. Summer months (July–September) held a higher plateau around the low $20s, leading to the October high at $23.87. Costs softened in November and partially rebounded in December, consistent with year-end dynamics where auction pressure can fluctuate. The January 2026 collapse diverged from the established pattern, contrasting with the more typical early‑year dip seen broadly in the market.

Education vs. Global

Compared with the global all‑industry baseline, Education’s CPL averaged $19.27 in 2025 versus $41.53 globally—about 54% lower. The gap persisted throughout the year: Education CPLs trailed global levels by 42% to 60% each month. The narrowest gap appeared in May (−42% vs. global), while November marked the widest (−60%). Both series climbed into Q3–Q4—global costs rose from $35.04 in January to an October high of $48.83 (+39%)—but Education’s percentage swings were larger. In dollar terms, monthly volatility was similar (Education $3.07 vs. global $3.13), yet on a relative basis Education was over twice as volatile (16% vs. 8%). In January 2026, the baseline eased to $34.46 (−18% vs. December), while Education dropped to $0.81—about 98% below the global figure for the month.

Closing

Taken together, these Facebook Ads benchmarks show Education’s cost-per-lead trends across all countries: consistently below the global all‑industry level, with clear Q3–Q4 firmness, a pronounced May lift, and a singular January 2026 trough. For teams comparing CPL performance and country-specific ad costs within broader industry ad performance, this provides a grounded reference alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance for the Education industry worldwide.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Education industry, Facebook ad costs can be moderate, with higher costs for professional and specialized courses. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.