Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Energy and Mining

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Energy and Mining

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Energy and Mining lead generation costs moved through a year of sharp peaks and deep troughs, averaging close to the global benchmark but traveling a far rockier path. Across all countries, Cost Per Lead (CPL) for the category averaged $42.69, hovering about 4% above the overall market’s $40.94 median. The headline moments came early and mid-year: a dramatic surge in February, followed by a midsummer trough in July–August. By October, CPL had eased to $23.16, ending roughly 15% below where it began in November.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Energy and Mining in all countries available compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Energy and Mining started at $27.17 in November, lifted to $69.91 in December, then spiked to the annual high of $112.20 in February before sliding to $44.05 in March. The mid-year brought relative stability around the mid-$40s in April–June ($47.65, $41.96, $42.99), then a hard dip to the yearly low of $7.20 in August, rebounding to $43.90 in September and finishing at $23.16 in October.

Across the 12 months, the category’s CPL ranged from $7 to $112, a swing of roughly $105. Month-to-month volatility averaged $29, far choppier than the global benchmark’s average monthly move of about $3. Notable pivots included a $74 surge from January to February and a $68 correction from February to March, followed by the July–August slide (down to $13.92 and then $7.20) before September’s rebound.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The rhythm split into four chapters:

  • Late Q4 (Nov–Dec) showed a low base in November and a year-end lift in December; October then softened again to $23.16.
  • Q1 was the costliest stretch for leads: January–March averaged about $64.8, well above the global Q1 average (~$36.5). February’s $112.20 defined the peak.
  • Q2 normalized near $44.2, suggesting steadier performance after the Q1 spike.
  • Q3 marked the trough. July and August were the softest months of the year ($13.92 and $7.20), before a September rebound back to $43.90.

Global seasonality followed a steadier, gradual build into late Q3, peaking in September ($48.29) and easing slightly in October ($45.08), contrasting with Energy and Mining’s mid-year lull.

Country vs. Global

Compared with the overall benchmark, Energy and Mining was above market in 7 of 12 months and below in 5. The gap was narrowest in May (+3%) and June (+5%), and widest at both extremes: +178% above the global median in February and −84% below it in August. Directionally, the global benchmark rose about 9% from November to October, while Energy and Mining fell around 15%, indicating a more erratic trajectory for industry ad performance across all countries than the broader market.

Closing

Taken together, these Facebook Ads benchmarks show a high-variance Cost Per Lead profile for Energy and Mining across all countries: a Q1 spike, a mid-year trough, and an end-of-period fade, yet an annual average that sits just above the global market. Understanding CPL trends alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance helps frame country-specific ad costs within a global view. This report summarizes Cost Per Lead benchmarks for the Energy and Mining industry across all countries available compared to worldwide patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.