See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Energy and Mining lead costs didn’t defy gravity this year—they surfed it. Across all countries, Cost Per Lead (CPL) for the category tracked close to the global all‑industry level on average, yet moved with far sharper swings. A December-to-February run-up set the early tone, followed by a steep mid-year trough, a brief September rebound, and a late-year slide to the lowest point of the period. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Energy and Mining in all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The series opens at $27.17 in November 2024 and closes at $4.10 in November 2025—an 85% decline end-to-end. In between, Energy and Mining hit a high of $112.20 in February 2025 and a second-high of $69.91 in December 2024. Five months clustered in the low-to-mid $40s (March, April, May, June, and September), while the low was set in November 2025 at just $4.10.
Across the full window, Energy and Mining CPL averaged $39.21, essentially on par with the $39.83 global all-industry benchmark. The difference wasn’t the level—it was the ride. Month-to-month movements averaged $28.28 for the category versus just $4.23 globally, with the largest upswing from January to February (+$74.04) and the sharpest drop from February to March (−$68.15). Other notable shifts included a summer slide from June to August (−83%) and a fivefold jump from August to September.
The period shows a classic Q4/Q1 surge pattern followed by mid-year softening. CPL accelerated into December 2024 (+157% from November), peaked in February 2025 (+61% from December), and cooled through Q2, settling into the $42–48 range. Summer brought a pronounced trough: July fell to $13.92 and August to $7.20, before a September rebound to $43.90. The final stretch reversed again, with October at $16.55 and a fresh low of $4.10 in November. Performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1; this series reflects that rhythm at an amplified scale.
Compared with the global all-industry benchmark, Energy and Mining ran hotter in seven of the 13 months (December through June) and cheaper in six (November 2024, July through November 2025). At the widest premium, February’s CPL was 178% above global levels; at the deepest discount, November 2025 was 86% below. The narrowest gap came in May 2025, when Energy and Mining was just 3% above the benchmark.
The global series itself was steadier: it ranged from a high of $47.62 in September 2025 to a low of $28.58 in November 2025 and ended 31% lower over the period. Energy and Mining mirrored the global average level ($39–40) but was roughly seven times more volatile, swinging between triple-digit peaks and single-digit lows.
In short, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Lead in the Energy and Mining industry across all countries show parity with global averages but far greater volatility—surging in late 2024 and early 2025, softening mid-year, and falling sharply into November 2025. For marketers comparing industry ad performance, CPL trends in Energy and Mining offer a clear contrast to the steadier global all-industry pattern, reinforcing how country-specific ad costs and category dynamics shape outcomes in an all-country view.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app