Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Energy and Mining in Denmark

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Energy and Mining in Denmark

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads benchmarks: cost-per-lead trends and global context

This analysis looks at cost-per-lead (CPL) trends for industry Energy and Mining and target country Denmark compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

Key takeaways

  • No in-market readings were available for Energy and Mining in Denmark in the provided period, so relative positioning versus the global baseline cannot be determined.
  • Globally, CPL averaged 35.8 over the last 13 months, peaking in November (41.6) and hitting a low in September 2025 (20.6).
  • Seasonality is visible: costs rose in Q4 (average 37.4), consistent with holiday-driven competition, then stabilized in late Q2–Q3 before a sharp drop in September 2025.
  • Volatility: average month-to-month absolute change was 3.67 (12.6% on a relative basis), with the largest swing occurring in September 2025.

Dataset coverage

  • Metric: cost-per-lead (CPL)
  • Industry: Energy and Mining
  • Country: Denmark
  • Selected segment: no monthly CPL observations available in the input window
  • Baseline: global time series from Sep 2024 to Sep 2025

Global baseline trend highlights

  • Average CPL: 35.8 across Sep 2024–Sep 2025.
  • High/low:
  • High: 41.6 in November 2024.
  • Low: 20.6 in September 2025.
  • Range: 20.9 between peak and trough.
  • First-to-last change: from 32.9 in September 2024 to 20.6 in September 2025, a decrease of 37.3%.
  • Volatility:
  • Average absolute month-to-month change: 3.67.
  • Relative basis: 12.6% average absolute month-to-month move.
  • Notable spikes and dips:
  • Q4 uplift: October–December averaged 37.4, about 4.6% above the full-period average, with a pronounced spike in November.
  • Early-year normalization: January–March moved from 35.5 to 32.8, suggesting a return toward pre-holiday levels.
  • Spring–summer plateau: April–July hovered in the upper 30s (roughly 38.4–39.6), indicating relatively steady acquisition costs.
  • Sharp dip in September 2025 to 20.6, the largest single-month decline in the period.

Comparison to the selected segment

  • Denmark, Energy and Mining: no CPL data points were available in the period, so an above-market, in-line, or below-average assessment versus the global baseline cannot be made.
  • Use the global baseline as directional context: expect higher CPLs during Q4 and steadier performance in late spring and summer, noting that the latest data point shows an unusually low September 2025 globally.

What this means for benchmarking

While specific in-market figures for Energy and Mining in Denmark are not present in this window, the global baseline indicates typical Facebook Ads seasonality for CPL: elevated costs in Q4, normalization in Q1, and relatively stable mid-year performance—with a recent outsized drop in September 2025.

Understanding cost-per-lead benchmarks on Facebook Ads in Energy and Mining and Denmark helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Energy and Mining industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. For campaigns targeting Denmark, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Denmark Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Jan 1New Year's Day
Apr 17Maundy Thursday
Apr 18Good Friday
Apr 20Easter Sunday
Apr 21Easter Monday
May 29Ascension Day
Jun 8Whit Sunday
Jun 9Whit Monday
Dec 25Christmas Day
Dec 26Second Day of Christmas

Key Shopping Season

Christmas & Boxing Day (late Dec), Easter holidays (groceries, travel, tourism), Mother's Day and Valentine's Day

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC could rise during Easter period due to travel-related campaigns. Late December ad competition might intensify in retail and hospitality. Whit Weekend might reduce weekday competition. Strict retail closures on holidays could drop competition, but pre-holiday CPMs may escalate.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.