Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Fitness & Training Centers

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Fitness & Training Centers

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

The headline for Fitness & Training Centers is clear: lead costs ran well below the global benchmark for most of the year, but with sharper swings and a dramatic mid‑year spike. Across all countries, cost per lead (CPL) in this category averaged $29.7 in 2025, roughly 29% lower than the $41.5 global benchmark across all industries. The year opened steady, plunged in spring, surged to a July peak, then cooled into winter as the broader market kept climbing. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Fitness & Training Centers across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

CPL started at $27.21 in January and ended at $21.86 in December, a 20% slide across the year. The low arrived early at $13.50 in April, then the category vaulted to its high at $48.33 in July before easing through autumn. The full-year range was wide—$34.8 from trough to peak—underscoring a choppy market for lead costs.

Month to month, movements were pronounced. The steepest single jump came from June to July (+$21.72), while the sharpest drop landed from March to April (−$14.11). After the July spike, CPL declined in four straight months into November, effectively flatlining around $32.94 in October–November before a year-end dip to $21.86. Volatility averaged $7.44 per month, about 2.4 times more turbulent than the global benchmark’s $3.13.

On average, Fitness & Training Centers kept CPL under $30 for half the year (January, March, April, May, June, December). July marked the only month above the broader market.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed a clean rhythm. Q1 was steady with a $28.5 average, then Q2 softened materially to $20.0 as CPL hit the annual low in April. Q3 flipped the script: an aggressive rise drove the quarterly average to $41.0, led by July’s peak. Q4 then cooled to a $29.2 average, with prices stabilizing around $33 in October–November before dropping into December.

This arc contrasts with a more traditional pattern in Facebook Ads benchmarks, where competition tends to intensify into Q4. Here, Fitness & Training Centers experienced a mid‑year crest and ended the year softer, suggesting category-specific dynamics driving lead pricing across all countries.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global benchmark, the category was consistently more affordable. The average CPL gap was about 29% below market. April marked the widest discount at 64% below global levels, and December was also deeply discounted (−48%). The narrowest gap appeared in August (−10%), and in July the relationship inverted—Fitness & Training Centers ran 18% above the global benchmark, the only month to do so.

Trend lines diverged as the year progressed. The global benchmark rose steadily from $35.04 in January to $42.24 in December (+21%), while Fitness & Training Centers moved the other way (−20%), in a choppier pattern with higher month‑to‑month variance.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for Fitness & Training Centers across all countries point to a below-market yet more volatile year: a spring trough, a mid‑year surge, and a softer finish against a steadily rising global baseline. For teams tracking CPL trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks, this category view helps anchor industry ad performance and country-agnostic ad costs to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Fitness & Training Centers industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.