See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Across all countries, Fitness & Training Centers saw a cost-per-lead story that runs cheaper than the market but with sharper ups and downs. From a $44 CPL in November 2024 to $25 in November 2025, the category fell 42% over the period, averaging $30 — well below the $40 global all-industry benchmark. The year pivoted around a deep trough in April, a sharp surge in July, and a cooler Q4. Volatility was notable: month-to-month shifts averaged $8.8 versus the market’s $4.2, signaling a more dynamic auction environment for fitness leads.
This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Fitness & Training Centers across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
The period opens at $44.15 CPL in November 2024, briefly dives to $21.47 in December, and enters 2025 at $27.21. Through Q1, CPL held in the high-$20s (average $28.73), then undercut itself in Q2 with a pronounced dip to $14.14 in April — the yearly low — and a quarterly average of $21.32.
Momentum flipped in Q3. CPL jumped to a yearly high of $48.23 in July, then eased to $39.31 in August and $33.42 in September (Q3 average $40.32). Q4 cooled again: $32.10 in October and $25.45 in November. Across the 13 months, Fitness & Training Centers averaged $30.33 per lead, spanning a wide $14–$48 range — a 2.4x swing, with average monthly moves of $8.76.
Key beats:
The rhythm was soft–strong–soft. After a modest Q1, Q2 marked the weakest stretch (April’s $14 stands out), suggesting easier acquisition conditions in late spring. Q3 reversed course decisively with a July spike, keeping CPL elevated through September before easing into Q4. By November 2025, CPL settled near $25 — still above April’s low but far off the mid-year highs. This sequence aligns with a common year pattern where engagement and competition shift meaningfully between mid-year and year-end, though the fitness category’s amplitude was larger than average.
Relative to the global all-industry benchmark, Fitness & Training Centers were consistently cheaper and more volatile:
In short, the fitness industry’s CPL across all countries ran meaningfully below the global norm but with bigger month-to-month swings and a pronounced Q3 crest.
For Facebook Ads benchmarks, the cost-per-lead picture shows Fitness & Training Centers across all countries outperforming the global average on cost while exhibiting higher volatility. Understanding cost-per-lead trends for Fitness & Training Centers across all countries helps marketers gauge category-level acquisition costs and compare them to global patterns in broader industry ad performance.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Fitness & Training Centers industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app