Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Hardware and Networking

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Hardware and Networking

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Hardware and Networking advertisers saw a dramatic reset in cost per lead over the past year. Across all countries, CPL opened extremely elevated in late 2024, then dropped hard into early 2025, stabilized through mid-year, and softened again late summer into October. Compared to the global, all‑industry benchmark, this category carried a premium most of the year but flipped to below‑market levels by Q3–Q4. The standout months were December 2024 at the peak and October 2025 at the low, underscoring a more volatile trajectory than the broader market.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Hardware and Networking across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across November 2024–October 2025, Hardware and Networking median CPL averaged about $54 (median ≈ $54), well above the global all‑industry average of roughly $41 (median ≈ $40.9). The category peaked at $100.36 in December 2024 and ultimately fell to a $20.96 low in October 2025—a 79% swing from peak to trough. The period began at $98.29 in November 2024 and ended at $20.96 in October 2025, a 79% decline across the window. Excluding the Q4 spike, 2025 YTD averaged $45, still 11% above the global 2025 pace (~$40.8).

Monthly movements were pronounced. December to January plunged 69% ($100.36 → $30.93), then February rebounded 92% to $59.40. From March through July, costs held a mid‑$50s range ($51.73–$56.49) before cooling sharply in August ($32.19) and again in October ($20.96). Average absolute month‑to‑month change was about $15—nearly 5× the global benchmark’s ~$3—signaling materially sharper swings for Hardware and Networking.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality showed two distinct arcs. Q4 2024 was unusually costly for Hardware and Networking, with November–December posting the year’s highest CPLs. The typical early‑Q1 softening appeared abruptly in January, followed by a spring recovery that steadied into early summer. Late summer brought a clear reset: August dipped more than 40% from July, with another step down into October, marking the period’s trough. By contrast, the global benchmark traced a classic curve: a March low ($33.27) and a steady climb to a September high ($47.62), reflecting broad market competition intensifying into late Q3.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global all‑industry benchmark, Hardware and Networking was mostly above market but ended below. The category outpaced the benchmark in 8 of 12 months, including large premiums in November (+137%) and December (+153%) 2024, and consistent overage from February through July (+28% to +56%). The gap narrowed and then inverted late year: August (−27%), September (−21%), and October (−54%) all ran below global CPLs. While the global trend rose steadily from March to September (+43%), Hardware and Networking was choppier—falling 62% from July to October—and far more volatile throughout.

Closing

These Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead highlight how Hardware and Networking industry ad performance across all countries has been higher on average than the global norm, yet notably more volatile, with a decisive late‑year pullback. Understanding CPL trends within this category—alongside broader CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps contextualize country‑specific ad costs and compare industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Hardware and Networking industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.