Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Hardware and Networking

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Hardware and Networking

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Hardware and Networking lead costs ran hotter and choppier than the market in 2025. Across all countries, Cost per Lead (CPL) for this industry swung from early lows to a year-end surge, with a mid-year dip that briefly undercut the global benchmark before rebounding sharply into Q4. Volatility defined the year: fast lift in February, a soft stretch in late summer, and the steepest spike in December.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Hardware and Networking across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Hardware and Networking CPL started at $30.93 in January and ended at $77.57 in December, a 151% climb from start to finish. The annual average landed at $50.21 (median $53.24), with the highest month in December ($77.57) and the lowest in January ($30.93). The path wasn’t linear: a +91% jump from January to February ($59.05) set an elevated tone for the spring, with April–July largely holding in the mid-to-high $50s. A pronounced retreat followed—August ($36.70) and October ($31.26) formed a second trough—before a sharp Q4 rally: +65% from October to November ($51.72) and another +50% into December’s peak.

Month-to-month volatility averaged about $11, far sharper than the global all-industry benchmark’s ~$3.10 average swing. Peak-to-trough from July to October showed a 45% drop, underscoring how sensitive Hardware and Networking CPL was to changing demand and auction pressure.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Q1 was mixed: an unusually low January, then a rapid February reset, leaving the quarter at a $47.64 average. Q2 was the steadiest, averaging $55.67 across April–June with minimal week-to-week drama. Q3 marked the softest period—$44.03 average—driven by a swift July-to-August pullback that extended into October. Q4 was split: October stayed subdued ($31.26), then momentum returned in November and culminated in December’s high watermark.

These rhythms align with broader Facebook Ads benchmarks where competition typically tightens toward year-end; however, Hardware and Networking showed an exaggerated late-summer softness and an outsized December spike versus what’s typical in general CPM analysis or CTR performance narratives.

Country vs. Global

Against the global benchmark (all industries, all countries), Hardware and Networking CPL averaged 21% higher in 2025 ($50.21 vs. $41.53). The gap moved widely month to month:

  • Above market for eight months, including sustained premiums through spring and an +84% spread at the December peak.
  • Below market for four months—most notably October, when CPL sat 36% under the global level.
  • The narrowest gap appeared in November (+7%), suggesting brief alignment before December’s acceleration.

Trend-wise, the global series rose steadily about 21% from January to December with modest variance, while Hardware and Networking climbed 151% over the same span—more volatile, more episodic, and more seasonally amplified. The late-summer stretch (Aug–Oct) averaged $35.38 versus the global $46.86, then flipped to a notable premium in November–December.

Closing

Within Facebook Ads benchmarks, this Cost per Lead view for Hardware and Networking across all countries complements how marketers look at CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance by revealing the industry’s distinct cost curve. Taken together, these benchmarks highlight industry ad performance patterns and country-specific ad costs at a global rollup—showing how Hardware and Networking CPL diverged meaningfully from the overall market in 2025.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Hardware and Networking industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.