Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Hardware and Networking

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Hardware and Networking

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Hardware and Networking advertisers across all countries saw a two-act year in Facebook Ads cost-per-lead (CPL): an exceptionally expensive Q4 2024 followed by a mid-2025 plateau and a sharp deflation into early Q4 2025. On average, CPL in this industry ran higher and moved more sharply than the global benchmark, starting near triple-digit costs before falling to the lowest point of the period by October. Big swings defined the story, with December’s peak giving way to a dramatic January reset and a second slide late summer into fall.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Hardware and Networking across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point and finish: CPL opened at $98.29 in November 2024 and closed at $21.19 in October 2025, a 77% decline across the window.
  • Highs and lows: The period peaked at $100.36 in December 2024 and bottomed at $21.19 in October 2025, a $79 range.
  • Average: The industry averaged $54.30 CPL across the 12 months, versus a $40.94 global average.
  • Volatility: Month-to-month absolute moves averaged $14.97, far above the global benchmark’s $3.22 average swing.

Key monthly dynamics:

  • December’s $100.36 high underscored a premium Q4.
  • January reset to $30.93 (−69% month over month), the sharpest single drop.
  • February rebounded to $59.40, then March–July settled into a narrow $51.7–$56.5 band.
  • August stepped down to $32.19, September ticked to $37.45, and October slid again to the $21.19 low (−43% vs. September).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The pattern aligns with classic seasonal pressure: costs ran hottest in late Q4 2024, then eased materially in early Q1. From March through July, CPL stabilized in the mid‑$50s, showing a relatively steady acquisition cost after the post-holiday normalization. Late Q3 introduced a second leg down: August marked a clear break from the mid-year plateau, and CPL continued to soften into October, setting the period low.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, Hardware and Networking CPL was:

  • Higher on average: $54.30 vs. $40.94 globally (+33%).
  • More volatile: average monthly swing of $15, roughly 4.6x the global benchmark.
  • Above market in six months (February–July), below market in four (January and August–October), and dramatically above in Q4 2024.

The gap shifted throughout the year:

  • Overperformance was widest in December (+153% vs. global).
  • Near parity in January (13% below global).
  • Underperformance widened late: August (−28%), September (−23%), and deepest in October (−53%).

The global trend itself climbed steadily from early-year lows (roughly $33–$36 in March–January) to $45–$48 by September–October. In contrast, Hardware and Networking moved in the opposite direction from mid-year onward, declining from the mid‑$50s plateau to $21 by October.

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in the Hardware and Networking industry across all countries show a year marked by a costly Q4 spike, a spring-to-summer stabilization, and a pronounced late-year decline. These CPL trends highlight a more volatile, higher‑cost profile than the global average, with a clear divergence from market direction in the back half of the period. Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for Hardware and Networking across all countries helps contextualize industry ad performance, country-specific ad costs, and how CPL compares to broader CTR performance, CPM analysis, and CPC trends worldwide.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Hardware and Networking industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.