Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Healthcare

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Healthcare

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Healthcare lead costs across all countries traced a dramatic arc over the past 13 months: an early-year surge, a mid-year reset, and a steep slide into late Q4. On average, Healthcare’s Facebook Ads cost per lead (CPL) ran slightly below the global benchmark, but month-to-month swings were far sharper than the market overall. The category peaked at nearly $57 in March before falling to just under $20 by November, highlighting a year defined by spikes, reversals, and widening discounts versus the market late in the year. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Healthcare in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting point to endpoint: Healthcare CPL opened at $30.02 in November 2024 and closed at $19.79 in November 2025, a 34% year-over-year decline.
  • Highs and lows: The category hit its high at $56.86 in March 2025 and its low at $19.79 in November 2025—a 65% peak-to-trough slide.
  • Average level: Healthcare averaged $38.4 per lead versus the global average of $39.8.
  • Key movements: A steady climb carried CPL from December ($32.03) through March (+77% from December to March). April snapped lower to $41.13 (−28% vs. March), May rebounded to $49.98, and June reset to $39.02. The most decisive drop arrived in September ($25.83, −36% month over month), followed by an October bounce to $32.99 and a sharp November decline to $19.79 (−40%).
  • Volatility: Absolute month-to-month changes averaged about $8.7 for Healthcare, more than double the global benchmark’s $4.2, underscoring a choppier category profile.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Healthcare CPLs built momentum through Q1, rising from $39 in January to $56.86 in March. Q2 was mixed—April cooled, May lifted, June reset—before a marked softening through late Q3. September delivered the most abrupt correction of the year, with October partially recovering and November falling to the yearly low. In contrast to typical Q4 competition patterns often seen in Facebook Ads benchmarks, the observed period closed with a notable drop in November for both Healthcare and the global set.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the all-industry global benchmark, Healthcare ran 3–4% lower on average but with pronounced, alternating premiums and discounts:

  • Above market: January through May (and July) mostly sat above global levels, with the widest premium in March at +71% versus the benchmark.
  • Below market: June, August, and then September through November came in below global levels. The sharpest discount landed in September (−46%); November was −31% below market.
  • Divergent mid-year trajectories: From March to September, Healthcare CPL fell 55%, while the global benchmark rose 43% over the same span, highlighting a unique category reset.
  • Gap dynamics: The closest points to global were June (−5%) and July (+3%), before the differential widened meaningfully into late Q3 and Q4.

Closing the period, both Healthcare and the global benchmark ended lower year over year (−34% and −31%, respectively). The net effect: Healthcare in all countries averaged slightly below market CPLs, with much sharper month-to-month swings and a late-year discount versus global levels.

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for Healthcare in all countries helps quantify country-specific ad costs, compare category CPL trends to the global market, and situate Healthcare performance within broader Facebook Ads benchmarks spanning CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Healthcare industry, Facebook ad costs can be higher than average due to specialized audience targeting and compliance requirements. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.