Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Healthcare

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Healthcare

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Global Healthcare lead costs moved in a different rhythm than the broader market. Across all countries, Healthcare cost per lead (CPL) climbed sharply into March, then unwound through late summer and settled back near where it started—while the global all‑industry benchmark rose steadily into Q3 and remained elevated into October. Volatility was the defining feature: Healthcare CPL swung far more than the market, with standout extremes in March and September.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Healthcare in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Healthcare CPL averaged 39.9 over the period, ranging from a low of 26.0 in September to a high of 56.9 in March. It opened at 30.0 in November 2024 and finished at 29.9 in October 2025—essentially flat end‑to‑end—despite a near‑doubling from November to March (+90%), followed by a 54% retreat from March to September.

Monthly movements were pronounced. Gains stacked up through Q1 (Nov→Dec +2.0; Dec→Jan +7.0; Jan→Feb +9.7; Feb→Mar +8.1) before a sharp reset in April (−15.8). Another rise in May (+8.9) was met by a two‑month slide into June (−11.0), a mild lift in July (+4.4), and a steep drop into the September trough (−15.9), with a modest rebound in October (+3.9). Average absolute month‑to‑month change was 8.0 points—about 20% of the mean—flagging a choppier profile.

For context, the global all‑industry benchmark averaged 40.9, with a smoother range: 33.3 (March low) to 48.3 (September high). Its average monthly swing was 3.2 points, roughly 2.5× calmer than Healthcare.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The Healthcare pattern inverted typical market seasonality. Instead of softening in Q1, CPL spiked, peaking in March (56.9) before moderating in April and May and sliding into a late‑summer low (26.0 in September). By contrast, the broader market trough occurred in March (33.3), then costs climbed steadily through Q3, reaching a September high (48.3) and remaining elevated in October (45.1). Healthcare’s late‑summer softness and end‑period reset returned CPL to near its Q4 2024 starting levels.

Country vs. Global

Compared to the global benchmark, Healthcare ran slightly below average overall (39.9 vs. 40.9, −3%). The gap, however, was inconsistent:

  • Above market in January–May and July, most notably March (+71% vs. global).
  • Below market in November–December and August–October, widest in September (−46% vs. global).
  • The narrowest gap appeared in July, with Healthcare about 3% above global levels.

Across the period, the global trend rose steadily (+9% from November to October), while Healthcare finished flat, with larger interim swings and a summer reversal that the broader market did not mirror.

In short, these Facebook Ads benchmarks show a high‑volatility CPL profile for the Healthcare industry across all countries, marked by a Q1 surge, a late‑summer trough, and a net‑flat finish versus a steadily rising global baseline. Understanding cost‑per‑lead benchmarks for Healthcare in all countries helps situate industry ad performance against global patterns in Facebook Ads CPL trends and CPM/CTR performance context.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Healthcare industry, Facebook ad costs can be higher than average due to specialized audience targeting and compliance requirements. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.