Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Healthcare in Israel

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Healthcare in Israel

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads cost per lead benchmarks: monthly trends and comparison

Key takeaways

  • Based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.
  • For Healthcare in Israel, cost per lead (CPL) is mostly below the global trend through early 2025, before an extreme spike in August 2025.
  • Over the observed months, the local CPL averaged 50.49, skewed by August; excluding August, the average is 4.56 versus the global baseline average of 36.30 over the same months.
  • Seasonality globally shows a Q4 lift (higher CPL in November–December); Israel’s series dips in November–December, rebounds in January, then surges in August.
  • Volatility in the selected data is high across successive observations, with several large swings; the baseline is comparatively steady.

What this analysis covers

This analysis looks at cost per lead trends for industry Healthcare and target country Israel compared to the global trend. We summarize averages, highs, lows, changes between observations, and seasonal signals, then benchmark Israel against the global baseline.

Trends in the selected data

  • Coverage: 2024-09, 2024-10, 2024-11, 2024-12, 2025-01, 2025-08.
  • Average CPL: 50.49 across the period; excluding the August spike, 4.56.
  • High/low: High at 280.14 (2025-08); low at 2.91 (2024-11).
  • First-to-last change: from 3.70 (2024-09) to 280.14 (2025-08), approximately +7,480%.
  • Notable movements between reported months:
  • Sep → Oct: +54.7%
  • Oct → Nov: −49.0%
  • Nov → Dec: +2.1%
  • Dec → Jan: +151.8%
  • Jan → Aug: +3,636% (large jump between the last two observations)
  • Pattern: Costs softened in late Q4 (Nov–Dec), rebounded in January, then spiked sharply by August.

Comparison to the global baseline

  • Overlapping-month average: 36.30 (baseline) vs 50.49 (selected). Without August, the selected average (4.56) sits well below the global 36.30.
  • High/low (overlap): Baseline high 41.58 (2024-11), low 31.12 (2024-10).
  • First-to-last change (Sep 2024 to Aug 2025): Baseline +12.6% vs selected +7,480%.
  • Volatility (successive observations):
  • Baseline shows moderate shifts: −5.3% (Sep→Oct), +33.6% (Oct→Nov), −4.7% (Nov→Dec), −10.3% (Dec→Jan); average absolute move ≈13.5%.
  • Selected shows much larger swings; average absolute change excluding the August jump ≈64.4%.
  • Relative positioning by month (selected vs baseline):
  • Sep 2024: 3.70 vs 32.88 (≈89% below market)
  • Oct 2024: 5.72 vs 31.12 (≈82% below)
  • Nov 2024: 2.91 vs 41.58 (≈93% below)
  • Dec 2024: 2.98 vs 39.63 (≈92% below)
  • Jan 2025: 7.50 vs 35.54 (≈79% below)
  • Aug 2025: 280.14 vs 37.03 (≈7.6× global; ≈657% above)
  • Broader baseline context: The global trend typically rises in Q4 (Nov–Dec), softens in January, and remains relatively stable through mid-year, with a notable dip in September 2025 to 20.63.

Seasonality signals

  • Global: Clear Q4 lift (higher CPL in November–December), followed by a January pullback and mid-year stability.
  • Israel Healthcare: Divergent Q4 (Nov–Dec dip), then a January rebound and an outlier surge by August.

Understanding cost per lead benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Healthcare and Israel helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Healthcare industry, Facebook ad costs can be higher than average due to specialized audience targeting and compliance requirements. For campaigns targeting Israel, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Israel Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Apr 13–19Passover
May 1Independence Day
Jun 2Shavuot
Sep 23–24Rosh Hashanah
Oct 2Yom Kippur
Oct 7–14Sukkot

Key Shopping Season

Passover (April), Sukkot and Fall holidays (Sept–Oct), Hanukkah (December)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during Passover as consumers prepare homes and plan meals. Fall holiday cluster may see media consumption fluctuate—consumers often offline during holidays, but prior week advertising demand may peak. Yom HaAtzmaut might spark tourism and leisure engagement. Hanukkah could drive e‑commerce CPMs for toys and electronics.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.