Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for HR & Staffing

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for HR & Staffing

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks: month-by-month trend analysis

This analysis looks at cost-per-lead (CPL) trends for industry HR & Staffing and target country All countries available compared to the global trend. The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks.

Main takeaways

  • Overall level: The selected CPL averaged 18.54 versus the global baseline’s 37.06, about 50% below market across the period.
  • Highs and lows: Selected peaked at 40.53 (Sep 2024) and hit a low of 3.85 (Jul 2025). Baseline ranged from 31.12 (Oct 2024) to 41.58 (Nov 2024).
  • Trend direction: Selected fell 86.8% from the first to the last month (Sep 2024 to Aug 2025). The baseline rose 12.6% over the same window.
  • Volatility: Selected month-to-month moves averaged about 58% (absolute), far more volatile than the baseline’s 9.8%.
  • Seasonality: The baseline shows the typical Q4 elevation, while the selected series softened through Q4 and then stepped down sharply in Q1, stabilizing at very low levels from May onward.

Overview of the selected trend

  • Average: 18.54 across Sep 2024–Aug 2025.
  • High/low: High of 40.53 (Sep 2024); low of 3.85 (Jul 2025).
  • First-to-last change: From 40.53 (Sep 2024) to 5.36 (Aug 2025), down 86.8%.
  • Notable moves:
  • Q4 2024 drifted down from 29.07 (Oct) to 26.96 (Dec) after a high start in September.
  • A sharp drop in January to 6.49 (-75.9% vs December) was followed by a rebound to 26.20 in February (+303.8% vs January) and 31.05 in March.
  • After April (17.03), CPL compressed dramatically: May–Aug averaged about 4.60 (4.17, 5.01, 3.85, 5.36), indicating a sustained low-cost phase.

Comparison with the global baseline

  • Relative positioning: Selected averaged 50% below the global baseline (18.54 vs 37.06). It tracked above market only in September 2024; every subsequent month was below average.
  • Highs/lows:
  • Selected: 40.53 (Sep 2024) vs low 3.85 (Jul 2025).
  • Baseline: 41.58 (Nov 2024) vs low 31.12 (Oct 2024).
  • Volatility: Selected’s average absolute month-to-month change (~58%) is substantially higher than the baseline (~9.8%), signaling stronger swings specific to HR & Staffing across all countries.
  • Seasonal alignment:
  • The baseline follows familiar Q4 pressure (Nov peak 41.58; Dec 39.63).
  • The selected series did not mirror this; it eased through Q4 and then compressed further in Q1, with an especially low January.
  • In late spring and summer, the gap widened: May–Aug selected averaged ~4.60 versus ~38.42 in the baseline (about 88% below market).

Seasonality and volatility context

  • Baseline seasonality is clear: costs typically increase in Q4 around holiday periods, then normalize in Q1–Q3.
  • The selected HR & Staffing series across all countries diverged from this pattern, showing a pronounced structural step-down from January and exceptionally low CPLs from May onward, while remaining below average versus the global trend throughout.

Understanding cost-per-lead benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry HR & Staffing and All countries available helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.