See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
July 2025 - July 2026
Detailed observation of presented data
Overall story: HR & Staffing Cost Per Lead (CPL) showed large, episodic swings across the 13-month window and landed below the global median on average, but with two pronounced spike months that punctured that pattern. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for HR & Staffing in All countries compared to the global benchmark.
At a glance: HR & Staffing averaged roughly $30.1 per lead vs a global median of about $45.6 — roughly 34% lower. Yet the series is highly volatile: a very low starting point in mid‑2025, a dramatic August 2025 spike, a second large surge in February 2026, and a June 2026 finish that sits above the opening month but well below the global median.
Beginning and end: CPL began at about $5.72 in June 2025 and closed at $15.02 in June 2026 — a net increase of roughly 163% from start to finish. Central tendency: the monthly median for HR & Staffing is about $24.6, while the mean is ~$30.1 (13 months). Global (baseline) mean across the same months is ~$45.6.
Highs and lows: the lowest reading was $5.72 (June–July 2025), the highest was a dramatic $99.83 in August 2025. A second peak occurred in February 2026 at ~$52.19. Between July and August 2025 the market jumped nearly 17.5x (~+1,650%), and January→February 2026 rose almost 2.9x (~+193%). Aside from those spikes, several months sat in the $13–$42 range.
Volatility: month-to-month swings frequently exceeded 50% and in extreme cases surpassed 1,600%, making the HR & Staffing CPL stream markedly choppier than the global baseline, which stayed in a tighter band between roughly $35 and $53.
Rhythm and pockets of strength/softness: the series opens at a trough in mid‑2025, then surges into late summer (August 2025), cools into autumn, and drifts through winter before the large February 2026 surge. Spring 2026 (March–May) shows elevated but declining CPLs (mid $40s to high $20s), with June 2026 settling near $15. This pattern contrasts with a steadier global cadence that peaked around late winter (Feb–Mar) and eased into late spring.
Typical seasonal behavior evident in the baseline — a winter uptick followed by softer spring months — is present, but HR & Staffing overlays that rhythm with abrupt, month-level shocks rather than smooth seasonality.
Relative positioning: HR & Staffing CPLs were often below global levels — on average about 34% lower — but that relationship was inconsistent. The narrowest gap occurred in February 2026 when HR & Staffing ($52.19) was roughly 2% below the global median ($53.35). The widest negative gap was in June/July 2025 when HR & Staffing readings (~$5.7) were about 86–87% below global (~$43). Conversely, in August 2025 HR & Staffing overshot the global benchmark by about 126% (≈$99.8 vs $44.2).
In short, HR & Staffing shows lower average cost-per-lead than the global benchmark but is far more volatile, punctuated by outsized monthly deviations both above and below the baseline.
Understanding Cost Per Lead benchmarks for HR & Staffing across All countries — as part of Facebook Ads benchmarks, CPC trends, CPM analysis and CTR performance discussions — illuminates the episodic, country-aggregated swings in industry ad performance and frames how industry ad performance compares to stable global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the HR & Staffing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app