Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks in Israel

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead in Israel

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Israel’s cost-per-lead story in 2025 reads as a year of calm punctuated by dramatic surges. For most months, CPL in Israel sat below the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, but a handful of outsized spikes in late summer and fall pushed the annual average far above the worldwide norm. The rhythm was atypical: a soft first half, a sharp lift in May, a brief reset, and then a breakout through August–November before a year-end collapse.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for all industries in Israel compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Israel’s CPL opened at $25.28 in January and closed at just $8.27 in December, a 67% decline from start to finish. The average across 2025 landed at $104.72, elevated by a few extreme months. The high watermark was August at $385.52, with additional peaks in November ($309.53) and October ($255.66). The year’s lows clustered in April ($14.39), June ($17.23), July ($19.51), and the December trough.

The monthly path was choppy:

  • Jan–Apr eased from $25–33 down to $14.39.
  • May spiked to $125.23, then June–July cooled back to the teens.
  • August surged to $385.52, September retraced to $36.49, and October–November rebounded to $255.66 and $309.53.
  • December fell sharply to the year’s low of $8.27.

Volatility was the defining trait. Israel’s average absolute month-to-month move was roughly $140, vastly higher than the global benchmark’s $3.13. The range in Israel stretched from $8 to $386, compared with a narrower global span of roughly $33 to $49.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality appeared in exaggerated form. The first half of the year was subdued, averaging $40.27 for January–June. The second half averaged $169.16—about 4.2x higher—driven by a late-summer spike and Q4 elevation in October–November. December typically eases as campaign dynamics shift, and Israel mirrored that pattern with a sharp drop to $8.27.

Globally, CPL showed a steady climb toward Q4 as competition increased, cresting in October–November before easing in December. Israel tracked that cadence directionally but with far larger amplitude.

Country vs. Global

On a full-year basis, Israel’s average CPL of $104.72 was about 2.5x the global average of $41.53 (+152%). Yet month by month, Israel spent most of the year below market: 8 of 12 months under the global median. The gaps swung widely:

  • Narrow gaps early: February (−18% vs. global), March (−20%), September (−25%).
  • Extreme overages later: May (+221%), October (+423%), November (+540%), and especially August (+789%).

The global trend rose steadily from January to November (+38%), while Israel’s line was far more volatile—declining through spring, spiking in late summer, and whipsawing into year-end.

The CPL view sits alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance for a fuller read on country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance; in 2025, Israel stands out primarily for the magnitude of its swings.

Closing

Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for all industries in Israel show a year marked by prolonged below-market months punctuated by extreme late-summer and Q4 surges, resulting in a much higher annual average than the global benchmark. Understanding these CPL patterns helps frame Israel’s industry ad performance against worldwide trends.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. Different industries see varying ad costs due to market competition, user demographics, and conversion value. For campaigns targeting Israel, advertisers should consider local market factors and user behavior. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

Israel Advertising Landscape

National Holidays

Apr 13–19Passover
May 1Independence Day
Jun 2Shavuot
Sep 23–24Rosh Hashanah
Oct 2Yom Kippur
Oct 7–14Sukkot

Key Shopping Season

Passover (April), Sukkot and Fall holidays (Sept–Oct), Hanukkah (December)

Potential Advertising Impact

CPM and CPC might rise during Passover as consumers prepare homes and plan meals. Fall holiday cluster may see media consumption fluctuate—consumers often offline during holidays, but prior week advertising demand may peak. Yom HaAtzmaut might spark tourism and leisure engagement. Hanukkah could drive e‑commerce CPMs for toys and electronics.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.