Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for IT Services & Outsourcing

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for IT Services & Outsourcing

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Cost per lead for IT Services & Outsourcing across all countries moved through a year of sharp peaks and deep troughs, consistently pricier than the global, all‑industry benchmark for most months before flipping below it late in the period. The category opened very elevated in November–December 2024, then unwound rapidly in early Q1, spiked again in March, and eased into a late‑summer low. The standout months bookended the story: December 2024 hit a high of $109 per lead, while September 2025 dropped to $18 — a swing that underscored unusually high volatility versus the steadier global trend.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for IT Services & Outsourcing in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

  • Starting at $87 in November 2024 and ending at $21 by October 2025, the category’s CPL fell 76% across the period.
  • The average CPL was $56, ranging from a high of $109 in December to a low of $18 in September — a $91 span.
  • Month to month, CPL moved by an average of $23, about seven times the global market’s $3 average swing over the same months.
  • Key movements: a 25% lift from November to December, a 67% drop into January, a 157% surge in March, and a 61% slide from August to September before a mild October rebound to $21.

By contrast, the global benchmark averaged $41 with a much narrower range ($33 in March to $48 in September) and a gradual rise into late summer before a small October pullback.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The pattern followed a recognizable, if exaggerated, social ads rhythm. Q4 2024 was the costliest stretch (Nov–Dec average: $98), with competition likely pushing CPLs higher across the ecosystem. Early Q1 softened, with January–February averaging $34, before a forceful March rebound to $81. Q2 stayed elevated (average: $63), then costs cooled through Q3, culminating in the year’s least expensive month in September ($18). October ticked up but remained low relative to earlier periods.

The global series showed a smoother cadence: mild softness in March, then a steady climb from spring into September and a modest easing in October — far less choppy than IT Services & Outsourcing.

Country vs. Global

Across the full window, IT Services & Outsourcing CPL averaged 38% above the global benchmark ($56 vs. $41). The category sat above market in 8 of 12 months, notably in December (+175%), March (+142%), and May (+80%). It hovered near parity in January (+1%) and August (+3%), and moved decisively below global levels in February (−22%), September (−62%), and October (−53%). The gap was widest in December and narrowest in August and January. While the global baseline edged up roughly 9% from November to October, IT Services & Outsourcing trended the opposite way, declining steeply into late Q3 before stabilizing.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost‑per‑lead benchmarks for IT Services & Outsourcing across all countries helps marketers gauge where CPL trends diverge from the global pattern. This CPL‑focused readout complements broader Facebook Ads benchmarks across CPC trends, CPM analysis, CTR performance, and industry ad performance, providing a clear view of country‑specific ad costs at a worldwide level.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the IT Services & Outsourcing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.