See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Cost per lead for IT Services & Outsourcing across all countries ran materially above the market for most of the year, then flipped sharply lower into early Q4. The category averaged $56 per lead versus a $41 global all‑industry benchmark, with a pronounced Q4 2024 spike (peaking at $109 in December), a Q1 correction, a March rebound, and a steep slide to sub‑$25 lows by September–October. Volatility was the defining feature: month‑to‑month moves averaged about $23, roughly seven times the global benchmark’s $3 swing. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for IT Services & Outsourcing across all countries compared to the global benchmark.
IT Services & Outsourcing CPL started at $87 in November 2024, surged to a cycle high of $109 in December, then reset to $36 in January and $31 in February. March delivered a sharp rebound to $80, followed by elevated mid‑spring levels: $64 in April and $74 in May. From there, costs eased to $50 in June and $59 in July, narrowed toward parity in August at $46, and dropped to the year’s low in September at $18 before a modest October uptick to $21. Across the 12 months, the median CPL averaged $56 (high: $109 in December; low: $18 in September), ending down 76% from November’s level.
The global all‑industry baseline was steadier: it ranged from $33 (March low) to $48 (September high), averaging $41. It finished October at $45 after a gradual rise from spring.
Volatility differed sharply. IT Services & Outsourcing saw average absolute monthly moves of about $23; the global benchmark shifted roughly $3 per month, underscoring far choppier category dynamics.
Seasonality showed clearly. Q4 2024 brought the most expensive leads of the period, with December standing out as the peak. A common Q1 softening followed: January and February marked the trough within the early year. March reversed that softness with a rebound, and costs stayed relatively elevated through late spring and early summer. August signaled a convergence with the market, and late Q3 into early Q4 saw a decisive slide to the lowest CPLs of the year, well below global levels.
Relative to the global benchmark, IT Services & Outsourcing was predominantly above market early and mid‑year, then fell below it late. The category exceeded the global median by:
Across the full window, IT Services & Outsourcing averaged about 38% higher than the global CPL, but the gap narrowed dramatically over time. The narrowest gap came in January (~1% above market); the widest in December (~175% above). While the global series climbed steadily from $33 in March to $48 in September (+45%), the category swung from $31 in February to $81 in March, then declined to $18 by September.
In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in IT Services & Outsourcing across all countries show a year marked by a Q4 price spike, a Q1 reset, a short March rebound, and a decisive late‑year cooling, with volatility far exceeding the global trend. Understanding CPL trends and country‑agnostic, industry ad performance benchmarks helps contextualize CPM analysis, CPC trends, and CTR performance for IT Services & Outsourcing relative to global, all‑industry patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the IT Services & Outsourcing industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app