Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Marketing & Advertising

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Marketing & Advertising

October 2024 - October 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Key takeaways

  • Cost-per-lead for Marketing & Advertising across all countries is consistently below the global baseline, averaging about 44% lower over the period.
  • Selected data averages 19.98 per lead (high: 26.68 in March 2025; low: 12.98 in September 2025) versus the baseline’s 35.80 (high: 41.58 in November 2024; low: 20.63 in September 2025).
  • Volatility is higher in the selected series (average month-to-month move ~23%) than in the global baseline (~13%).
  • Q4 seasonality appears in the baseline (notably higher in November–December), while the selected data spikes in October then softens in November–December.
  • From September 2024 to September 2025, the selected series is nearly flat (-1.3%), while the baseline declines sharply (-37.3%).

The analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis looks at cost-per-lead trends for industry Marketing & Advertising and target country All countries available compared to the global trend.

Selected data overview (Marketing & Advertising, all countries)

  • Average and spread: The series averages 19.98, ranging from a high of 26.68 (March 2025) to a low of 12.98 (September 2025).
  • Trend: From the first month (September 2024 at 13.15) to the last (September 2025 at 12.98), CPL edges down by 1.3%.
  • Volatility: Average absolute month-to-month change is ~22.7%, with notable swings:
  • +70.0% in October 2024 (13.15 to 22.36)
  • +39.1% in January 2025 (15.38 to 21.39)
  • -34.8% from April to May 2025 (26.62 to 17.37)
  • -43.3% from August to September 2025 (22.87 to 12.98)
  • Notable pattern: A sustained high plateau across February–April 2025 (25.07–26.68), followed by mid-year normalization (May–June around 17–18) and a late summer rebound (July–August ~22.4–22.9) before a sharp September dip.

Comparison with the global baseline

  • Level comparison: The selected series is below market throughout the period, averaging 19.98 vs. the baseline’s 35.80 (approximately 44% lower overall).
  • Monthly gaps: The smallest gap appears in March 2025 (selected 26.68 vs. baseline 32.84; ~19% below). The largest gap is November 2024 (15.51 vs. 41.58; ~63% below).
  • Volatility: The selected data is more volatile (~23% average month-to-month move) compared to the baseline (~13%).
  • Directional change: Over the full window, the baseline falls -37.3% (32.88 in September 2024 to 20.63 in September 2025), while the selected data is nearly flat (-1.3%).

Seasonality and timing

  • Baseline shows classic Q4 pressure: higher costs in November–December (peaking in November).
  • The selected series shows an early Q4 spike in October, then moderates in November–December—somewhat out of phase with the global pattern.
  • Both series experience a pronounced dip in September 2025, with similar sharp month-to-month declines.

Understanding cost-per-lead benchmarks on Facebook Ads in industry Marketing & Advertising and All countries available helps advertisers make more efficient budget and creative choices.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketing & Advertising industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.