See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type
November 2024 - November 2025
Detailed observation of presented data
Marketing & Advertising lead costs ran slightly above the market on average, but with far sharper swings than the global benchmark. The year opened with an elevated November 2024, saw a midsummer surge, and then a steep slide into October 2025 — finishing well below global levels. The story is one of choppy momentum: short bursts of inflation punctuated by quick resets. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Marketing & Advertising in all countries compared to the global benchmark.
Across all countries, Marketing & Advertising cost per lead (CPL) averaged $41.90 from November 2024 to October 2025, versus a $40.94 global all‑industry median. The period started high at $62.59 in November 2024 and ended at a low of $27.18 in October 2025 — a 56.6% decline from start to finish.
Highs and lows were pronounced. The category peaked in November ($62.59) and again in July ($54.61). The trough came in October ($27.18), with softer reads in June ($37.24) and September ($36.71). Month-to-month moves underscored the volatility: average absolute changes were $8.93, roughly 2.8x the global benchmark’s $3.22. Notable swings included a December drop (−35% vs November), a February rebound (+32% vs January), a July spike (+47% vs June), and a three-month slide from August to October (−30%).
By comparison, the global benchmark rose more smoothly. It averaged $40.94, climbed from $41.47 in November to a September high of $48.29, then eased to $45.08 in October — an 8.7% lift across the same window.
Seasonality showed familiar contours but with sharper amplitudes. Late Q4 2024 carried a premium for Marketing & Advertising, led by November’s peak. Q1 2025 blended a February surge into otherwise mid‑$30s to low‑$40s CPLs (Q1 average ~$42.8). Q2 moderated (average ~$38.0) with tighter readings in the high‑$30s. July delivered a standout spike, followed by a steady cooling through August and September and a decisive drop into October — the lowest CPL of the year.
In contrast, the global series followed a classic climb from a March trough ($33.35) to a September peak ($48.29), reflecting broader Facebook Ads benchmarks where competition and spend typically build through midyear. While CPC trends and CPM analysis often spotlight budget pressure, this CPL view highlights how engagement and conversion costs for Marketing & Advertising oscillated more dramatically than the market.
Relative positioning flipped over the year. Marketing & Advertising CPLs were above market in half of the months: +51% in November, +26% in February, +29% in July, and modestly above in December–January–March. Parity months were tight (e.g., December +3%; April −2%). From April through June, the category hovered just below the benchmark (−2% to −9%). The gap widened sharply in late Q3 and early Q4: −14% in August, −24% in September, and −40% in October. Average CPL landed 2% higher than global across the full period, but the path was far more volatile, with a range of $35.42 versus the market’s $14.95.
In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead show Marketing & Advertising across all countries averaging slightly above the global median but with much larger month-to-month swings — from a November spike to a July surge and a pronounced late-year decline. Understanding cost per lead dynamics for Marketing & Advertising across all countries helps teams evaluate industry ad performance, interpret CTR performance alongside CPL, and compare country-specific ad costs to global patterns.
Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs
Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketing & Advertising industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.
We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.
Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.
Improve your Facebook ad performance
• Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.
• Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.
• Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.
All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.
This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.
A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.
Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.
Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.
Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.
If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.
Discover detailed cost benchmarks for different Facebook advertising metrics:
Average cost per click benchmarks across industries
Cost per thousand impressions across different markets
Benchmark click-through rates for Facebook ads
Cost per lead across different markets
Average cost per purchase benchmarks across industries
See how much it costs to get users to install an app