Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Marketplaces

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Marketplaces

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Marketplaces ran a pricier and choppier cost-per-lead story than the broader market, swinging from a January high to a December low while the all‑industry trend moved more steadily. Across all countries, Marketplaces’ CPL started elevated, softened through midyear, spiked briefly in November, then dropped sharply into December—ending far below the global average. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Marketplaces globally compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Over the 13-month window (Dec 2024–Dec 2025), Marketplaces’ median CPL averaged $47, peaking at $78.21 in January and bottoming at $19.72 in December. The period opened at $56.70 (Dec 2024) and closed 65% lower, pointing to a sustained downtrend with interruptions rather than a smooth slope.

The year’s shape was distinct:

  • Q1 stayed elevated (Jan–Mar: $78.21 → $58.04 → $60.74).
  • Spring eased (Apr–Jun: $60.37 → $40.97 → $48.51).
  • Q3 marked the low plateau (Jul–Sep average near $30.0).
  • Q4 turned volatile: October steadied at $33.58, November surged to $64.63, and December plunged to the cycle low at $19.72.

Volatility was the defining feature. Average month-to-month movement in Marketplaces CPL reached $14.78, nearly 4x the global benchmark’s $3.91, with the sharpest swings in early Q1 (+$21.5 MoM in January) and late Q4 (+$31.0 in November, −$44.9 in December).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonality split the year in two. H1 2025 averaged $57.81, then H2 slid to $34.67—a 40% lower back half. The midyear trough was concentrated in Q3 (Jul–Sep averaging about $30), a calm but compressed period after spring’s comedown. Q4 diverged from typical year-end rhythms: Marketplaces saw a November spike to one of the highest months of the year before a decisive December reset to the lowest CPL observed.

By contrast, the all‑industry benchmark climbed gradually through late Q3/early Q4 (peaking around $48 in Sep–Oct) and then eased in December, reflecting more familiar end-of-year competition and budget dynamics.

Country vs. Global

Compared with the all‑industry global benchmark, Marketplaces CPL averaged 17% higher over the period ($47 vs. $40). The gap was widest in January, when Marketplaces ran roughly 2.2x the global CPL (+124%). Through spring, the premium narrowed (May was only +5%), then flipped negative through much of Q3 and October:

  • July to October trailed the market by 15% to 39%.
  • August and December were the deepest discounts (around −39% vs. global).
  • November briefly reasserted a premium (+41%).

Trajectory also differed: while the global benchmark slipped a modest 15% from Dec 2024 to Dec 2025, Marketplaces fell 65%. H1/H2 splits highlight the divergence: the global average rose 15% in H2, whereas Marketplaces fell 40%.

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads benchmarks for cost per lead in the Marketplaces industry across all countries show a high-cost, high‑volatility first half, a compressed Q3, and an unusually sharp Q4 swing that ended at the year’s low. Understanding CPL trends for Marketplaces globally helps teams evaluate industry ad performance, compare to the all‑industry benchmark, and contextualize country‑specific ad costs within broader CPM/CTR performance cycles.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketplaces industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.