Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Marketplaces

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Marketplaces

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Marketplaces advertising spent most of the year paying a premium for leads before flipping to a bargain in the back half. Cost Per Lead (CPL) opened high, spiked sharply in January, then eased through spring and fell decisively from July to October, ending the period well below the all‑industry benchmark. Volatility was pronounced, with standout swings in January, May, and midsummer. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Marketplaces across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across the 13‑month window, Marketplaces CPL averaged about $45.9, ranging from a high of $78.22 in January to a trough of $21.21 in October. The series began at $64.37 in November 2024 and closed at $23.61 in November 2025—down roughly 63% from the starting point and about 70% below the January peak. Month‑to‑month movement averaged a sizable 9.5 points, with the largest jumps occurring in December→January (+21.5), January→February (−20.2), April→May (−19.4), and June→July (−17.2).

The turning point came after a hot first half. CPL stayed elevated through April ($60–$78), pulled back in May ($41) and briefly rebounded in June ($51), then entered a sustained downswing from July ($34) to October ($21) before a modest rebound into November ($23.6).

For context, the global all‑industry benchmark averaged $39.8 over the same period with a much narrower range ($28.58–$47.62) and lower monthly volatility (4.2 points). Its steepest single‑month move occurred in October→November (−16.5), a notable late‑year reset.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, the Marketplaces series shows a clear Q1/CY‑start surge, with January standing out as the costliest month for leads. Spring steadied but remained elevated, followed by a decisive mid‑year inflection: costs softened in May, then reset lower from July onward. The tightest cluster of low CPLs ran August–October, marking the least expensive stretch of the year, with a mild lift into November. The global benchmark, by contrast, rose gradually from March into early fall before a sharp November drop.

Country vs. Global

Relative to Facebook Ads benchmarks overall, Marketplaces CPL ran 15% above the global average across the full period. The gap was widest early: in Q1 2025, Marketplaces averaged $65.5 versus $36.4 globally—about 80% higher. Month by month, the premium peaked in January (+119% vs. global), stayed elevated through April (+44% to +81%), and narrowed to near parity in May (about +0%).

The relationship reversed from midsummer. Marketplaces CPL fell below the benchmark in July (−19%), then ran materially cheaper through August (−45%), September (−51%), and October (−53%), with November still below (−17%). Overall, Marketplaces was more volatile than the global trend, with a range nearly three times as wide and a sharper mid‑year pivot.

Closing

Within Facebook Ads benchmarks, this Cost Per Lead analysis highlights how Marketplaces’ industry ad performance diverged from the global pattern—costly and choppy early, then notably cheaper in late Q3–Q4. While CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance add context, CPL remains the clearest read on country‑specific ad costs at scale. Understanding CPL benchmarks for Marketplaces across all countries helps teams evaluate lead‑gen efficiency against global norms.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Marketplaces industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.