Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Media

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Media

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Media advertisers spent the year on a rollercoaster. Cost per Lead (CPL) across all countries started modest, surged to triple‑digit highs in Q3–Q4, then reset sharply at the start of 2026. Compared to the global, all‑industry benchmark—which moved within a relatively tight band—the Media category showed outsized swings, alternating between deep discounts and steep premiums versus the market. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for the Media industry across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Across the 13‑month window, Media CPL averaged $46.59, beginning at $13.82 in January 2025 and landing at $3.72 in January 2026. The year’s high hit $142.22 in December; the low was that January 2026 trough. For 2025 alone, the Media average was $49.85.

The early year was quiet: January–June averaged $15.95, with a May low of $7.56. Then the market shifted. July leapt to $108.42 (+337% vs. June), August eased to $67.63, September rebounded to $96.79, and October pulled back to $40.14. A mild November lift to $51.02 set up the December peak of $142.22 (+179% month over month). The new year opened with a reset to $3.72, a $138 drop from December.

Volatility defined the category. Month‑to‑month absolute changes averaged $40.86—over eleven times more volatile than the global benchmark’s $3.52 average change. The peak‑to‑trough range for Media ($3.72–$142.22) spanned $138.50, underscoring how quickly acquisition costs moved.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The pattern splits cleanly mid‑year. H1 (January–June) was the soft phase, with CPLs hovering in the teens and single digits by May. H2 (July–December) was the high‑cost phase: the six‑month average jumped to $84.37, roughly 5.3x H1 levels. The crescendo arrived in December, in line with year‑end competition typical of Facebook Ads benchmarks, followed by a pronounced January reset. The rhythm was choppy within that broader arc—sharp July lift, partial August giveback, September rebound, and an October dip before the December spike.

Country vs. Global

Relative to the global, all‑industry baseline (average $40.99 across the same period), Media ran higher on average (+14%) but with large, shifting gaps:

  • H1 discounts: Media trailed the market by 40–81% from January through June (May was widest at −81% vs. the $39.06 baseline).
  • H2 premiums: Media flipped above market by 56–237% in July–December (December was widest at +237% vs. the $42.24 baseline).
  • Narrowest gaps: October was only 18% below market; November hovered near parity at +6%.

The global benchmark itself was steady: it averaged $41.53 in 2025, ranged from $33.43 (March) to $48.83 (October), and ended near where it began ($35.04 in January 2025 to $34.46 in January 2026), a gentle decline of about 2%. In contrast, Media’s CPL expanded and contracted in large arcs against that steady backdrop.

Closing

As a snapshot of Facebook Ads benchmarks, this CPL analysis shows a quiet H1 and a volatile, high‑cost H2 for the Media industry across all countries, with a dramatic December peak and a sharp January reset. Understanding Cost Per Lead trends for Media globally—alongside related CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps interpret country‑specific ad costs and compare industry ad performance to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Media industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.