Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Nonprofit

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Nonprofit

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Across all countries, Nonprofit cost-per-lead (CPL) spent most of the year well below the global Facebook Ads benchmarks, then swung sharply higher in late summer and again at the start of 2026. The story is two-speed: an exceptionally efficient first half, followed by a choppy, elevated back half with two brief periods above the global median. Volatility was a defining feature, with outsized month-to-month swings concentrated in August, September, and January.

This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for the Nonprofit industry across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Nonprofit CPL started at $2.17 in January 2025 and ended at $57.72 in January 2026. The full-period median averaged $16.46, with a low of $2.17 (January 2025) and a high of $57.72 (January 2026). From January through June, CPL climbed gradually from $2.17 to $5.89, averaging just $3.73 — unusually efficient against the market. The tempo changed in July ($20.28) and surged in August to $51.26 (+153% month over month), before collapsing to $6.59 in September (−87% from August). Q4 held at a higher plateau — $17.42 in October, $17.96 in November, $20.39 in December — and then spiked to $57.72 in January 2026 (+183% from December).

Monthly volatility averaged roughly 12.1 dollars per lead in absolute terms, more than triple the global benchmark’s 3.5. The largest single swing was the August-to-September reset (−$44.67), while the steepest climb occurred in December-to-January (+$37.33).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The first half of 2025 was consistently soft in CPL terms, with a smooth, low base from January through June. Mid-year brought a pronounced lift: July increased markedly, August reached the yearly peak, and September rebalanced to near early-year levels. Q4 remained higher than H1 but relatively contained versus the August peak. In the broader market, CPL typically tightens through late Q3 and Q4 as competition rises, with some relief entering December and January; the global series reflects that arc, while the Nonprofit series diverged with a late spike in January 2026.

Country vs. Global

Compared to the overall benchmark across all industries and countries, Nonprofit CPL averaged $16.46 versus $40.99 — about 60% lower. The gap was widest early: in Q1 2025, Nonprofit averaged roughly $2.65 versus a global $36.2 (about 93% below). Through Q3, Nonprofit stayed below market on average (−41%), but August briefly ran above the global median by 18% ($51.26 vs. $43.40). Q4 Nonprofit CPL remained around 60% below the global level. The spread flipped again in January 2026, when Nonprofit CPL landed 68% above market ($57.72 vs. $34.46). Overall, the global trend was steady within the mid-30s to high-40s, while Nonprofit was more volatile, with sharper surges and resets.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for the Nonprofit industry across all countries highlights a year defined by ultra-low early CPLs, a mid-year spike, and a late‑year rebound that briefly ran above the market. While this report centers on CPL, marketers often view it alongside CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance to contextualize country-specific ad costs and industry ad performance relative to global patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Nonprofit industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.