Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Public Administration

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Public Administration

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Public Administration lead costs swung from extremes to whiplash reversals across all countries, consistently sitting above the global all‑industry benchmark on average but lurching between record highs and sudden troughs. The year opened with an extraordinary spike, cooled, then surged again before collapsing in spring and late summer—only to rebound into Q4. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Public Administration across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

COST_PER_LEAD for Public Administration started at an exceptional 1,650 in November 2024 and ended at 175.68 in October 2025—a steep 89% decline from start to finish, yet still well above market by October. The series averaged 287 across the period (median 104), highlighting how a few outsized months skewed the mean. The high was that initial 1,650 in November 2024; the low arrived in April 2025 at just 1.85, with another trough in August at 3.27.

Monthly movements were unusually sharp. From November to December, CPL fell 97% (1,650 to 49.93), then climbed 12% into January. March spiked to 536.64 (+864% vs January), before collapsing 99.7% into April. A spring rebound pushed May to 190.38, followed by a halving in June (98.99), a modest lift in July (109.93), a 97% plunge in August (3.27), and a powerful climb into October (175.68). On average, monthly swings measured 355 points—around 160x more volatile than the global benchmark’s average monthly movement of just 2.23 points over the same windows.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonal rhythms were amplified. Q4 2024 exhibited elevated pressure, led by the November spike and a lower, yet still above-market, December. Early Q1 was comparatively steady, then March broke out sharply. Q2 delivered the sharpest whiplash of the year: April’s low watermark gave way to a May recovery and a lighter June. Q3 mixed a firmer July with a sudden August drop, while early Q4 (October) rebuilt momentum.

Across these months, the range was wide: 1.85 to 1,650 (a spread of 1,648 points). By contrast, the all‑industry global benchmark ranged from roughly 33 to 45 over the same span, with a gentle upward drift.

Country vs. Global

Against the global benchmark (average ~40.12 over matching months), Public Administration CPL averaged about 7x higher. Relative positioning fluctuated dramatically:

  • Above market in most months: +26% in December, +56% in January, +1,513% in March, +366% in May, +142% in June, +161% in July, and +289% in October.
  • Far below market during two troughs: −95% in April and −93% in August.
  • The widest premium appeared in November 2024 (+3,870% vs global), while the tightest gap occurred in December (+26% vs global).

While the global benchmark rose steadily by roughly 9% from November to October with low volatility, Public Administration across all countries traced a much choppier path, ending higher than much of the midyear but far below its extraordinary start.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads COST_PER_LEAD benchmarks for the Public Administration industry across all countries highlights how industry-specific CPL trends can diverge from global norms—showing larger spikes, deeper dips, and notably higher averages than the all‑industry baseline. This view provides a clear reference point for CPL trends, CPM analysis context, and CTR performance comparisons within global Facebook Ads benchmarks for Public Administration.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Public Administration industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.