Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Public Administration

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Public Administration

January 2025 - January 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Public Administration advertisers across all countries saw a year defined by high CPLs and extreme swings. Compared to the global Facebook Ads benchmark across all industries, Cost Per Lead in this sector ran higher on average and was markedly more volatile, with a dramatic spike in November followed by a sharp reset in December. The year opened with an unusually low January, rebounded hard in February, and then climbed into an outsized Q4 peak before dropping to year-end levels below the global average. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Public Administration in all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Public Administration CPL averaged 57.52 across the period (median 57.43), well above the 40.06 global average. The sector started at 68.74 in December 2024 and ended at 29.84 in December 2025, a 57% December-to-December decline, versus a 15% decline in the global benchmark (38.44 to 32.53).

The year’s low came in January at 13.12—62% below the global level that month—followed by a sharp rebound to 71.39 in February. From there, costs oscillated in a higher band through midyear before climbing into Q4. The high arrived in November at 138.99, more than triple the global average that month (45.77). The monthly range spanned 126 points, and average month-to-month movement was 36.6 points—far steeper than the global benchmark’s 3.9-point average shift. In 9 of 13 months, Public Administration CPL sat above the market; May was effectively at parity (38.88 vs. 38.89), while January, July, and December were below.

Notable inflections:

  • January plunge from 68.74 to 13.12 (−56 points), then February surge to 71.39 (+58).
  • A steady midyear climb from July (35.84) to October (75.00).
  • November spike to 138.99 (+64 vs. October), followed by a December reset to 29.84 (−109).

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The pattern was whipsaw in Q1—soft in January, elevated by February, and moderating in March—yielding a Q1 average of 43.32 versus 35.94 globally. Q2 carried firmer costs (53.87 vs. 38.85 global), while Q3 cooled slightly (47.88 vs. 43.74). Q4 was the standout: averaging 81.28 for Public Administration compared with 42.24 globally, fueled almost entirely by November’s surge. Performance typically softens through Q4 as competition rises, with engagement rebounding in early Q1; here, CPLs followed an opposite rhythm—spiking in late Q4, then resetting in December.

Country vs. Global

Across all countries, Public Administration CPLs ran about 44% above the global benchmark on average. The gap was narrowest in May (near parity) and December (8% below the market). It was widest in November, when Public Administration CPLs were roughly 204% above global levels. While the global benchmark trended relatively smooth with a mild late-year dip, the Public Administration series was more volatile, ending lower year-over-year despite a significant Q4 run-up.

Closing

Understanding Facebook Ads cost-per-lead benchmarks for the Public Administration industry across all countries—alongside related CPC trends, CPM analysis, and CTR performance—helps frame country-specific ad costs against the global market. These CPL trends highlight how Public Administration industry ad performance compares to the broader Facebook Ads benchmarks worldwide.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Public Administration industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.