Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Public Administration

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Public Administration

February 2025 - February 2026

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Public Administration lead costs moved on a different rhythm than the broader market in 2025. While the global benchmark for Cost Per Lead (CPL) stayed relatively steady, Public Administration across all countries swung sharply—quiet in January, surging mid-year, and spiking hard into November before cooling in December. The result: a higher-cost, more volatile year than the global average, with standout peaks in late Q4. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Public Administration across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

Section 1: The story in the data

Across 2025, Public Administration CPL averaged $57, ranging from a low of $13 in January to a high of $130 in November. The year opened at $13, climbed to $71 in February, eased to $45–58 through spring, and then rose again through late Q3 and Q4, peaking at $130 before dropping back to $46 in December. From the January low to the November high, CPL expanded by 888%, underscoring unusual amplitude for a single year.

Volatility was a defining characteristic: the average absolute month-to-month move was $31.83, roughly 10 times the global benchmark’s $3.13. The largest month-over-month gain came in November (+$54.54 versus October), and the sharpest pullback followed in December (−$83.84). Over the full year, H2 averaged $65.65 versus $48.75 in H1—about 35% higher—showing a pronounced second-half lift.

For reference, the global benchmark averaged $41.53 in 2025, with a comparatively tight range from $33 (March) to $48.83 (October). That stability contrasts with Public Administration’s wide swing between $13 and $130.

Section 2: Seasonal and monthly dynamics

Seasonally, Public Administration demonstrated a soft start and an assertive finish. Q1 averaged $43 (held down by January’s unusual low), Q2 pushed higher at $54, and Q3 settled around $48. The most aggressive movement appeared in Q4: an $83 average across October–December, driven by the November spike. By comparison, the global benchmark showed a mild climb into Q3 and a modest Q4 plateau (Q3 at $44, Q4 at $46), a typical pattern as competition rises late in the year. Country-specific ad costs can vary, but in aggregate, Q4 was the pressure point for Public Administration CPLs in 2025.

Section 3: Country vs. Global

Public Administration CPLs ran about 38% above the global benchmark on average ($57 vs. $41.53). The category outpaced the market in 9 of 12 months, with the narrowest gap in May (−0.5% below global) and the widest gap in November (+168% above global). The deepest underperformance occurred in January, when CPLs sat 63% below global. Trend-wise, the market baseline rose gradually (+16% from March low to October high), while Public Administration traced a choppier line with larger swings and a much stronger Q4 surge (+74% from Q3 to Q4, versus +5% globally).

Closing

In sum, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Lead in Public Administration across all countries point to a higher-cost, more volatile year than the global average, with an outsized Q4 spike and a reversion in December. Understanding CPL trends for Public Administration helps advertisers gauge industry ad performance against global patterns and interpret how this category diverged from the broader market through 2025.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Public Administration industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.