Facebook Ads Insights Tool

Facebook Ads Cost Per Lead Benchmarks for Real Estate

See how your CPL compares. Explore lead generation cost benchmarks by industry, region, and campaign type

Cost Per Lead for Real Estate

November 2024 - November 2025

Insights

Detailed observation of presented data

Introduction

Globally, Real Estate lead costs ran well below the broader market this year, but with far sharper swings. Cost Per Lead for Real Estate across all countries opened elevated in November, fell into a deep trough by March–April, spiked in May, and then eased back to near lows by October. By contrast, the global all‑industry benchmark climbed steadily from spring into late summer. This analysis is based on $3B worth of advertising data from our dataset, which provides strong directional benchmarks. This analysis explores ad performance trends for Real Estate across all countries compared to the global benchmark.

The story in the data

Real Estate CPL started at $34.79 in November and ended at $20.19 in October, a 42% decline across the period. The segment averaged $27, ranging from a low of $17.53 in March to a high of $41.41 in May. The rhythm was choppy: after a December dip ($25.61), January rebounded to $32.15, February eased to $29.52, and March plunged to the year’s low. April ticked up to $18.88, then May surged 119% month over month to the peak. From there, the market retraced: June corrected to $26.57, July lifted to $31.47, and late summer/early fall slid steadily to $21.59 in September and $20.19 in October.

Volatility stood out. Average month‑to‑month movement in Real Estate CPL was about $7.75, more than double the global benchmark’s $3.22. The sharpest swing was April to May (+$22.54), followed by a swift pullback in June (−$14.84). Despite the May spike, the overall arc trended downward.

Seasonal and monthly dynamics

The first quarter was soft, culminating in the March low—consistent with broader seasonal pressure on lead generation costs early in the year. April remained subdued before an atypically large May spike. The summer never recaptured that peak; July showed a partial lift, but August through October settled into a lower-cost band, with October closing just above springtime lows. Across the wider market, costs generally accelerated into late Q3 and early Q4; Real Estate did not mirror that lift, keeping country‑agnostic ad costs comparatively muted in the back half of the year.

Country vs. Global

Against the all‑industry global benchmark, Real Estate was structurally lower. The segment averaged $27 versus the market’s $40.94, about 34% below. Real Estate trailed in 11 of 12 months; the sole exception was May, when it briefly ran 2% above the global CPL. The gap was narrowest in January (about 10% below) and widest in September and October (roughly 55% below). Directionally, the global benchmark rose about 9% from November to October, while Real Estate declined 42% over the same window—more volatile and counter‑trend to the market’s steady lift.

Closing

In short, Facebook Ads benchmarks for Cost Per Lead show Real Estate across all countries delivering meaningfully lower CPLs than the global all‑industry baseline, with pronounced mid‑year volatility and a late‑year ease. Understanding CPL trends and industry ad performance at a global level helps frame country‑specific ad costs and compare Real Estate results to broader market patterns.

Understanding the Data

Insights & analysis of Facebook advertising costs

Facebook advertising costs vary based on many factors including industry, target audience, ad placement, and campaign objectives. In the Real Estate industry, Facebook ad costs can be influenced by seasonal trends and market competition. Geographic targeting affects ad costs based on market competition and user engagement in different regions. Different campaign objectives lead to varying costs based on how Facebook optimizes for your specific goals. The data shown represents median values across multiple campaigns, and individual results may vary based on ad quality, audience targeting, and campaign optimization.

Why we use median instead of average

We use the median CTR because the underlying distribution of click-through rates is highly skewed, with a small share of campaigns achieving extremely high CTRs. These outliers can inflate a simple average, making it less representative of what most advertisers actually experience. By using the median—which sits at the midpoint of all campaigns—we provide a more rigorous and realistic benchmark that reflects the true underlying data model and helps you set attainable performance expectations.

Key Factors Affecting Facebook Ad Costs

  • Competition within your selected industry and audience demographics
  • Ad quality and relevance score – higher quality ads can lower costs
  • Campaign objective and bid strategy
  • Timing and seasonality – costs often increase during holiday periods
  • Ad placement (News Feed, Instagram, Audience Network, etc.)

Note: This data represents industry median values and benchmarks. Your actual costs may vary based on specific targeting, ad creative quality, and campaign optimization.

Optimize Smarter with Superads

Improve your Facebook ad performance

Instant performance insights – See which ads, audiences, and creatives drive results.

Data-driven creative decisions – Spot patterns to improve ROAS.

Effortless reporting – No spreadsheets, just clear insights.

Get Started for free →

The data behind the benchmarks

All data is sourced from over $3B in Facebook ad spend, collected across thousands of ad accounts that use Superads daily to analyze and improve their campaigns. Every data point is fully anonymized and aggregated—no individual advertiser is ever exposed.

This dataset updates frequently as new ad data flows in. It will only get bigger and better.

What is considered a good cost per lead on Facebook in 2025?

A good CPL usually ranges from $10 to $50, depending on your industry and target audience. B2C offers tend to be cheaper, while B2B or high-ticket services may see CPLs over $100.

Why is my CPL higher than industry averages?

Your CPL could be high due to weak creative, irrelevant targeting, or an offer that doesn't resonate. Low engagement or poor conversion rates on your landing page can also drive up costs.

Does campaign objective impact CPL?

Yes. Campaigns optimized for conversions or leads tend to generate cheaper and more qualified leads compared to traffic or engagement objectives. Facebook needs clear signals to find the right users.

How can I generate leads at a lower cost without hurting lead quality?

Focus on improving your offer, targeting the right audience, and using high-converting creative. Test native lead forms, but make sure you're still qualifying users properly.

Should I optimize for leads or conversions if my goal is pipeline growth?

If your goal is sales or revenue, optimizing for deeper funnel conversions is better. Optimizing for leads alone can inflate volume but hurt quality.